If we were transported forward in time, to an Earth ravaged by catastrophic climate change, we might see long, delicate strands of fire hose stretching into the sky, like spaghetti, attached to zeppelins hovering 65,000 feet in the air. Factories on the ground would pump 10 kilos of sulfur dioxide up through those hoses every second. And at the top, the hoses would cough a sulfurous pall into the sky. At sunset on some parts of the planet, these puffs of aerosolized pollutant would glow a dramatic red, like the skies in Blade Runner. During the day, they would shield the planet from the sun’s full force, keeping temperatures cool—as long as the puffing never ceased.
Technology that could redden the skies and chill the planet is available right now. Within a few years we could cool the Earth to temperatures not regularly seen since James Watt’s steam engine belched its first smoky plume in the late 18th century. And we could do it cheaply: $100 billion could reverse anthropogenic climate change entirely, and some experts suspect that a hundredth of that sum could suffice. To stop global warming the old-fashioned way, by cutting carbon emissions, would cost on the order of $1 trillion yearly. If this idea sounds unlikely, consider that President Obama’s science adviser, John Holdren, said in April that he thought the administration would consider it, “if we get desperate enough.” And if it sounds dystopian or futuristic, consider that Blade Runner was set in 2019, not long after Obama would complete a second term.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/climate-engineering
"Technology that could redden the skies and chill the planet is available right now."
ReplyDeleteThey're already doing it, i.e. the aluminum and barium ladened, and whatever else they include in these Chemtrails we see littering our skies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYG_hdZmTic&feature=related
Rady, I believe it is a combination of both.
ReplyDeleteIf the Earth were to experience another Solar Storm similar to that of 1859, it would have a significant impact on all electronics.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mystery_monday_031027.html
Sadly, the aluminum and barium is no doubt already having a significant impact on our health
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080618/allergy_report_080618
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/reno-nv/TT5NJ5RDUB4UEA9QA
a decent solar flare cycle is possible, and I am one of them that is more worried about the cooling cycle which is due on a long term look at the earths cycles, we are in a warm time now, but..
ReplyDeleteI am not saying don,t clean up the filth spewing into the air and water, but not that worried about Co2 as in fact, plants grow better! as it rises.
Nature allowed to work alone, with us, just doing our bit, would be a better option.
Solar flares would screw up our comms and all our electrical dependant economies/factories, so maybe nature will sort it out for us, faster than people think.
truly severe natural disasters will also screw up a lot of the NWO plans, so bring it on:-)
I'm afraid I trust nothing this govt does is for the good of humanity.
ReplyDeleteI just watched Barb's video post of the soldier given the "secret shot." That tells me everything I need to know about what our govt is up to as far as we the people go. It is up to no good.
As far as John Holdren? I'm posting an article I just read on infowars about a book he co-wrote with others in 1977. It's a real eye opener about how this man thinks.
Should we reduce pollution? you bet. Should we look to curb popoulation growth and discover better methods of sustaining all life on the planet? Sure. But to impose a tax on CO2 is ridiculous; I am a meterologist and I can tell you that 1) C02
ReplyDeleteonly is responsible for under 1% of any greenhouse warming, by far the most powerful greenhouse gas is water vapor, which we have no control of. 2) the weather patterns are always changing over time; this is the DEFINITION of climate. dweather/dtime.
3) even with the fact that many airport locations where temperatures are measured are now surrounded by a city's "heat island" instead of being in the cooler countryside like 40 years ago, global temperatures peaked in 1998 and have been cooling for the last 10+ years. Last year was so cool, we are back to 1930's average temperatures, and this is mainly due to the suns weaker output...not some gas we are emitting in
ever higher abundance; you know, the one that makes plants grow better as it's levels rise? Check out articles about how cold the fall and winter have been in the southern
hemisphere so far this year; where I live in North Dakota it has been 3-5 (F)degrees below normal for each month since last November, and December was 8 degrees F below normal. Today's low temperature was 45F (7C) and average lows this time of year are 64F (17C) and we have had only one day over 90F (32C) this summer so far. Crops are about 3 weeks behind in this area of the country and through a large part of the canadian prairies. It will take crop failures and snow in September for some people to wake up to the fact that we are in a cold spell; and we may remain that way for years to come if the current solar minumum of sunspots continues.
We've been "geo-engineering" for years. Militarizing the weather, in my opinion, has caused more damage to weather patterns than anything our cars can spew out.
ReplyDeleteThe carbon tax is just another way to break the american people and enslave us to the state. The high and haughty love to make everything seem like the little guys fault. I guess they figure the guilt they make us feel will make it that much easier for them to extract the last few pennies from our pocket. It's called conditioning and they are really good at it.
There is another problem with far reaching consequences that gets little discussion: solar dimming. Pollutants in the atmosphere have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching the surface in many areas by 10 to 20%.
ReplyDeleteAll life is dependent on photo-synthesis one way or another.
I don't know about where you live laudy, but the chem trails that blanket our skies around here nearly every day do a good job of blocking out the sun all on their own.
ReplyDeleteWell said Laudyms.
ReplyDeleteTry explaining Solar Dimming to the American people. Or photo-synthesis? Without it this planet is kaput.
So they spray the chemtrails, which I suppose is part of the solar dimming? Encapsulating the Earth with toxic clouds, shielding it from the Sun. Because the ramifications of a Solar Storm would mean no electronics or gadgets and inane text messaging
There's a lot of $ involved.
I don't even own a cell phone. I have a shoe phone though! Just kidding, of course.
If I could digress for just a moment.
Back in the 60's, I can vividly remember as a child, a couple of kids and myself connecting about twenty-five feet of basic string to center of two empty Campbell's soup cans, and then being able to talk through them. Just amazing!
The key was to first take the string and run it across the wax of a candle, allowing the sound to travel easier and clearer.
Munich, are you implying we should go back to tin can communication? Or perhaps you are shilling for campbell soup? lol
ReplyDeleteI do own a cell phone but for emergency use mostly. This past month I used all of 5 of my allotted minutes.
Honestly, sometimes I just don't feel like talking to anyone. Taking a break from technology can be so relaxing. I like the old Jerry Seinfeld bit where he explained what answering machines were all about. You call someone to leave a message when you know they aren't there because you really don't want them to answer. That way, you can continually stay in touch without the hassle of actually having to talk to them. lol I've actually used this strategy with those overly chatty friends that just won't let you off the line gracefully. When you say, I gotta go, they say, oh wait, let me tell you this one last thing.........