Alert - Thieves Paradise without Whistleblower Protection

Stop Wall Street Lobbyists from Destroying Whistleblower Protections! Take Action!       As reported in today's Washington Post, historic corporate whistleblower protections passed this summer are in danger of being destroyed by aggressive Wall Street lobbying. Your help is urgently needed to ensure that this does not happen.   TAKE ACTION! Demand the regulators protect corporate whistleblowers!   The Dodd-Frank Act was designed to hold Wall Street accountable and prevent another financial meltdown. A centerpiece of that reform was strong whistleblower protections. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodities Commission are writing detailed rules implementing the law and the Wall Street lobbyists are working overtime to kill the law through the back door. They are winning! The Proposed Rules issued by the SEC are a major setback for all whistleblowers. Public comment on these rules closes on December 17, 2010. Your voices are needed now!   TAKE ACTION! Prevent corporate lobbyists from destroying whistleblower protections!   The SEC admits that their proposed rules would “limit the pool of eligible whistleblowers,” “reduce the number of possibly useful informants,” “discourage some whistleblowers,” cause “persons not to come forward,” and result in “forgone opportunities for effective enforcement action.” These are not the rules that Congress intended.   The rules at issue affect every American from the price you pay at the gas pump (commodities) to the integrity of your retirement accounts (securities). We cannot allow this law to be undermined by a corporate-controlled the rulemaking process. Now is the time to tell the regulators that they must get it right before the final rules are published. We cannot allow the lobbyist voices to drown out the public interest.   The public comment period will close in just 25 days!!! Please PASS THIS ALERT ON to everyone you know who cares about honesty on Wall Street and protecting America from another financial meltdown fueled by greed.   Every American should demand that Securities and Commodity commissions implement rules that will protect, encourage, and reward whistleblowers.

Voodoo Legal Systems and Taboo Laws

Voodoo Legal Systems and Taboo Laws

Criminal offenses can be broken down into two general categories malum in se and malum prohibitum. The distinction between malum in se and malum prohibitum offenses is best characterized as follows: a malum in se offense is "naturally evil as adjudged by the sense of a civilized community," whereas a malum prohibitum offense is wrong only because a statute makes it so. State v. Horton, 139 N.C. 588, 51 S.E. 945, 946 (1905).

Actual harm, is criteria. A victim is necessary to charge a crime. Charging a crime in which the victim is the perpetrator is an oxymoron, thus automatically malum prohibitum. Consenting parties cannot be “victim and perpetrator” in any sane legal sense. A single person as “victim and perpetrator” is even more absurd, rationally and legally.

There are many laws in the so-called Judeo-Christian derived legal system that are purely based in Taboo, theocratic stricture having little or no basis in reason, but framed by ancient religious myth.

“Sodomy” is a law that is actually named upon the mythical “city” of Sodom, in the mythical texts of Torah, or the First Testament of “The Holy Bible”. “Fornicators and Sodomites”, translating to “Fuckers and Ass Fuckers” have tainted Western jurisprudence for centuries. Zionist Christianoids and Jews, still dance the jitterbug heebeejeebees of fire and brimstone over such acts. As late as the 1960s a child could be committed to an insane asylum for masturbation.

It wasn't until the 1980s that the laws against this were changed: sex between a married couple could be deemed an illegal act if fellatio was performed.
The hateful attacks on personal freedoms continue from fanatical religionists, who are legion in Amerika.

“Gay Marriage” is considered an attack on their religious rights, rather than their attack on individual rights. What possible harm that can be done to partners in a “traditional” marriage, cannot be reasonably explained--other than their sensibilities are hurt.
My sensibilities are hurt every time I have to look at an ass the size of a dumptruck; do I have a valid legal case? Can I have all these Amerikan sows put in quarantine?

[Taboo (tapu), Tahitian for “forbidden”]


©Butt Whole Productions® 2010

Its out of My hands

Lord knows I am trying to never hold a grudge or be vindictive. I am too tired to wage war on more than one front at a time.

There is a little despot I wanted to overthrow,she just has to go.

Institutionalized hate and neglect, I must reject.

Although I love a good fight I must refrain. I take it all too seriously.

It  causes Me mental and  physical pain.

The cries of the downtrodden have been heard by those stronger and more steeled for the fight.

Counselors learned and dedicated, much wiser than I

Will ride in like the cavalry to defend what is right.

Its out of My hands.

No Surprise at Obama’s Guantánamo Trial Chaos

No Surprise at Obama’s Guantánamo Trial Chaos
By Andy Worthington | 1.9.10

Surprise is the last thing that anyone ought to feel on hearing the news that the Obama administration “has shelved the planned prosecution,” in a trial by Military Commission, “of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the alleged coordinator of the Oct. 2000 suicide attack on the USS Cole in Yemen,” as the Washington Post reported on Thursday, or that senior officials are “alarmed” by negative responses to the trial by Military Commission of Omar Khadr, as the New York Times reported on Friday.

The problem in both cases is that trials by Military Commission are inappropriate for any of the prisoners held at Guantánamo, who are either accused of terrorist activities, and should be tried as criminals in the federal court system, or are soldiers seized in connection with their support of the Taliban, wrongly imprisoned in an experimental prison established to permit coercive interrogations, instead of being held in a prisoner of war camp in accordance with the Geneva Conventions.

The Commissions — dragged from the bowels of history in November 2001 by Dick Cheney — looked appropriate to the former Vice President, and to President George W. Bush, because they, like Guantánamo, appeared to be beyond the reach of the US courts, and would allow prisoners to be executed after largely perfunctory trials using evidence obtained through torture.

The Obama administration has failed to understand quite how ruinous these rulings are for the detention authority inherited from President Bush. Although senior officials have publicly repudiated Bush’s reliance on claims of seemingly unfettered power exercised as the Commander-in-Chief during wartime, Obama has continued to rely on the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), passed by Congress the week after the 9/11 attacks, which, with another Supreme Court ruling from June 2004 (Hamdi v. Rumsfeld) allows the government to detain anyone it regards as having supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban or related forces.

http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2010/09/02/no-surprise-at-obama%e2%80%99s-guantanamo-trial-chaos/#respond

\\ll//

Citizens United v. FEC:

A Country for Old Men.

“I need you to get out of the car…” ---Chief Justice Anton Chigurh

Sibel Sings! Videotape Available!

[caption id="attachment_5705" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Whistleblower Whistles Loud and Rude"][/caption]

Check 'em out here.

Update: no injuction filed to stop manadatory flu shots.

"(NaturalNews) -- A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New Jersey. This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal government as defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will stop the federal government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state or local government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or constitutional rights. Vawter's filings included a Complaint, and several pages of evidentiary Exhibits."

_______________

I can find zero proof a Priminary Injunction has been issued. Mr. Vawter filed documents with the court, but as of three hours ago, nothing has been issued by a judge and there has been no hearing.

I asked my friend who has been an attorney over 30 years (mostly in the federal courts) and subscribes to PACER to obtain the docket for me so I could verify the claims made in the Natural News piece. He said no injunction has been issued by the court.

more