The Template of Demoncracy

The Federal Reserve was set up in 1913 to finance both sides of two subsequent world wars. In other words, these wars were funded by the credit of the US taxpayer. Apart from profiting from it , the Illuminati bankers use war to enslave us with debt, enact social change and consolidate their power .
~Hamad Subani

Lawmakers consider new curbs on incendiary speech
By Russell Berman - 01/10/11 08:52 PM ET

“Shocked and saddened lawmakers grappled on Monday with the weekend shooting of one of their own, with some suggesting that new laws and regulations are needed to curb incendiary speech.
One lawmaker, Rep. Robert Brady (D-Pa.), has said he would introduce a bill to make it a crime to threaten or incite violence against a federal official.

Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) suggested the Federal Communications Commission was “not working anymore,” adding she would look at ways to better police language on the airwaves. A brick was thrown through a window of Slaughter’s district office last year. Abominable.”

All of this is a reaction to the remake of 'The Manchurian Candidate: 2011', staring, Jared Lee Loughner as MK Assassin, Gabrielle Giffords as a wounded congresswoman, and Federal Judge John McCarthy Roll as dead primary target.

The reaction above written by Berman is the frontal attack on the 1st Amendment free speech articles, while a second maneuver is an attack on the 2nd Amendment by another congressional contingent.

Naomi Kline's book "The Shock Doctrine" she writes: "we are assaulted with so many levels of serious crimes and crises: financial, illegal wars, depression, theft, and bioweapons,created illnesses. The list goes on and on to keep us off balance. This is to make our lives extremely difficult (except for the 1% rich who are profiting from this chaos), so we have no time to contemplate what is actually happening: The deliberate destruction of our country."

NOW, how can people just blow this off? I explain this to my mother and it goes in one ear and out the other as if there is nothing but thin air in-between. And she is just one of countless people I have talked to throughout my life. I always inquire as to what people think is happening. I am always met with stunning naivete, the ignorant conformity of programmed automatons.
A great and dark pathology embraces the entire planet..~ww

As Shakespeare said, “Hell is empty and the devils are here,” ~The Tempest

And this is a double headed Golem screaming at itself as it stomps on liberty;

Obama: “They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
Obama to His Followers: “Get in Their Faces!”
Obama on ACORN Mobs: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
Obama to His Mercenary Army: “Hit Back Twice As Hard”
Obama on the private sector: “We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.“
Obama to voters: Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
Obama to lib supporters: “It’s time to Fight for it.”
Obama to Latino supporters: “Punish your enemies.”
Obama to democrats: “I’m itching for a fight.”.

That is representative of the Left Hegelian rhetoric. Then there is the well known Right Hegelian thrust with it's rifle scope sights with “lefties” in them. All political theater; PSYOP.

REVISION OF JOINT PUBLICATION 3-53 DATED 10 JULY 1996
JOINT CHEIFS OF STAFF DIRECTIVE

“Psychological operations (PSYOP) are planned operations to
convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences
to influence the emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and
ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, organizations,
groups, and individuals. PSYOP are a vital part of the broad
range of US diplomatic, informational, military, and economic
activities. PSYOP characteristically are delivered as information
for effect, used during peacetime and conflict, to inform and
influence.”

However, under the new strategic maxim of Full Spectrum Dominance, the 'war theater' is perpetual and global—including the domestic “audience”. So these PSYOPs are directed to influence the Amerikan people as well.~ww

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22169
The nature of modern wars is based on usurping natural resources and the wealth of nations. Thus, these wars are materialist wars, either fought on strategic grounds to acquire wealth and power or to directly usurp it. Any ideological framework is used to deceive the masses. These wars are therefore criminal acts.~Madhi Darius Nazemroaya

“In 1996, U.S. Secretary of Defence, William Perry, started raising the alarms and saying that Iran was a “growing threat to stability in the [Persian] Gulf.”~ibid

But what this really means in Newspeak, is that Iran is a growing threat for stability in the Persian Gulf region. If the region cannot be maintained in a state of instability, the US would loose the leverage against a unified regional power. And further when the term US is used, it does not mean the nation, the United States, but the Financial Powers that use US military power as their enforcement arm.~ww

“While Tehran and Moscow signed an important cooperation agreement on March 12, 2001, a few months later Moscow and Beijing signed the Treaty of Good-Neighbourliness and Friendly Cooperation (July 24, 2001, less than two months before September 11, 2001).

The Chinese, the Russians, and the Iranians all saw the writing on the wall. Geo-political conflict was on the horizon and the U.S. and NATO war machine was getting ready to march into Eurasia.

At its roots the state serves elitist interests. In this context it is worth quoting George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. An excerpt from a fictitious book, Emmanuel Goldstein’s The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism, being read by Orwell’s protagonist Winston sums this point:

“The war, therefore, if we judge it by standards of previous wars, is merely an imposture. [...] But though it is unreal it is not meaningless. It eats up the surplus of consumable goods, and it helps to preserve the special mental atmosphere that a hierarchical society needs. War, it will be seen, is now a purely internal affair. In the past, the ruling groups of all countries, although they might recognise their common interest and therefore limit the destructiveness of war, did fight against one another, and the victor always plundered the vanquished. In our day they are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact. The very word [and conceptualization of] ‘war’, therefore has been misleading.”~Orwell

John F. Kennedy held a dinner in the White House for a group of the brightest minds in the nation at that time. He made this statement: "This is perhaps the assembly of the most intelligence ever to gather at one time in the White House with the exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone."

Thomas Jefferson said in 1802: I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.

http://www.rense.com/general92/back.htm

Brenton Greene, the director of the NCS on September 11, told the 9/11 Commission that on September 10, 2001, "miraculously, the SRAS system was turned on for exercise mode and thus it was ready to function on September 11." Therefore, when the NCS was required to assist the government's response to the terrorist attacks, the "SRAS was already in exercise mode and operational."

"On the morning of 9/11, the entire Continuity of Government program was activated. Every federal agency was ordered to activate an alternative command post, an alternative headquarters outside of Washington, DC, and to staff it as soon as possible." [13]

Considering that the SRAS is intended to support the COG program, it was convenient, to say the least, that it was already operational on September 11 and therefore immediately ready to be utilized by those involved with COG when the plan was activated.

In a certain sense, COTO is a gathering of Magi [Magus, plural]. It is that particular blend of intuition and informed rational contemplation that is our bonding principles. I don't mean this in an occult way at all. The occult is occult because it is hidden, that is what it means. We may investigate the hidden, but we are not of it.
But there are rituals. They may be “technological”, but they are indeed prescribed ritual. The word is simply not thought of in such a way by most. This comes from the same mind-set as those who think 'history is over', as if “that was then and this is now” has much real bearing on a cyclic process such as history. This attitude blinds one to amplifying the differences in human activities on trivial pretexts. A person sitting using his fingers, physical dexterity, concentration of focused attention while chipping an arrowhead is actually not substantially different, other than technological, what a person using a computer does. A great deal is just repetitive patterns, ie; rituals. Somehow, after all these eons, we are still humans locked in our moment of Now.
When one discovers, and truly 'groks' that the past is with us, it has brought us to this moment, the next step of getting that the future is here as well. The past and the present define it.

While this is easily perceived from a certain angle is beyond those who see from other angles.
The most common is a narrow conformist view of culturally enforced lazy thinking. The majority of people don't like thinking because it reminds them of 'taking a test' based on something being taught. This is the conditioning of rote instruction, the dulling of natural curiosity.

So not only do free thinkers annoy the “well informed academic”, but also those who have been programmed to 'feel' that thinking is practically subversive.
Insatiable curiosity frightens both types; who are actually two aspects of the same type, lazy thinkers. Consensus and conformity are intimate with one another.

So now, what is this? This is a story. Nothing more than a story. But it is my story, from my perspective, They are all only stories. The point is to live your own.
~Willy Whitten