Monday, June 14, 2010

Prof. Wortham hits a home run

This is Anne Wortham. She is Associate Professor of Sociology at Illinois State University  

and continuing Visiting Scholar at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.. 


                                                                             
 
She is a member of the American Sociological Association and the American Philosophical Association. 
 
She has been a John M. Olin Foundation Faculty Fellow, and honored as a Distinguished Alumni of the Year by the National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education. 
 
In fall 1988 she was one of a select group of intellectuals who were featured in Bill Moyer's television series, "A World of Ideas." The transcript of her conversation with Moyers has been published in his book, A World of Ideas. 
 
Dr. Wortham is author of "The Other Side of Racism: A Philosophical Study of Black Race Consciousness" which analyzes how race consciousness is transformed into political strategies and policy issues. 
 
She has published numerous articles on the implications of individual rights for civil rights policy, and is currently writing a book on theories of social and cultural marginality.
 
Recently, she has published articles on the significance of multiculturalism and Afrocentricism in education, the politics of victimization and the social and political impact of political correctness. Shortly after an interview in 2004, she was awarded tenure. 
 
This article by her is really,  really something. 

 ________________________________

Fellow Americans,
 
Please know: I am Black; I grew up in the segregated South. I did not vote for Barack Obama; I wrote in Ron Paul's name as my choice for president. Most importantly, I am not race conscious. I do not require a Black president to know that I am a person of worth, and that life is worth living. I do not require a Black president to love the ideal of America .
 
I cannot join you in your celebration. I feel no elation. There is no smile on my face. I am not jumping with joy. There are no tears of triumph in my eyes. For such emotions and behavior to come from me, I would have to deny all that I know about the requirements of human flourishing and survival - all that I know about the history of the United States of America , all that I know about American race relations, and all that I know about Barack Obama as a politician. I would have to deny the nature of the "change" that Obama asserts has come to America .
 
Most importantly, I would have to abnegate my certain understanding that you have chosen to sprint down the road to serfdom that we have been on for over a century. I would have to pretend that individual liberty has no value for the success of a human life. I would have to evade your rejection of the slender reed of capitalism on which your success and mine depend. I would have to think it somehow rational that 94 percent of the 12 million Blacks in this country voted for a man because he looks like them (that Blacks are permitted to play the race card), and that they were joined by self-declared "progressive" whites who voted for him because he doesn't look like them.
 
I would have to wipe my mind clean of all that I know about the kind of people who have advised and taught Barack Obama and will fill posts in his administration - political intellectuals like my former colleagues at the Harvard University 's Kennedy School of Government.
 
I would have to believe that "fairness" is equivalent of justice. I would have to believe that a man who asks me to "go forward in a new spirit of service, in a new service of sacrifice" is speaking in my interest.. I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the "bottom up," and who arrogantly believes that he can will it into existence by the use of government force. I would have to admire a man who thinks the standard of living of the masses can be improved by destroying the most productive and the generators of wealth.
 
Finally, Americans, I would have to erase from my consciousness the scene of 125,000 screaming, crying, cheering people in Grant Park, Chicago irrationally chanting "Yes We Can!" Finally, I would have to wipe all memory of all the times I have heard politicians, pundits, journalists, editorialists, bloggers and intellectuals declare that capitalism is dead - and no one, including especially Alan Greenspan, objected to their assumption that the particular version of the anti-capitalistic mentality that they want to replace with their own version of anti-capitalism is anything remotely equivalent to capitalism.
 
So you have made history, Americans. You and your children have elected a Black man to the office of the president of the United States , the wounded giant of the world. The battle between John Wayne and Jane Fonda is over - and Fonda won. Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern must be very happy men. Jimmie Carter, too. And the Kennedys have at last gotten their Kennedy look-a-like. The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs can feel warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a Black person.
 
So, toast yourselves: 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians. Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee Harvard, Princeton , Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a Black man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to - Do Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom and mine - what little there is left - for the chance to feel good. 
 
There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness. God Help Us all.


__________________________________

I'm in love

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/awortham.asp

23 comments:

  1. I appreciate her unwillingness to buy in to mass hysteria, but I really don't think Capitalism has been "rejected." In fact the Robber Barons have us hog tied and speeding on our way to peonage.

    Check out: What went wrong with Obama. The author notes " There is hardly anyone in the Democratic Party at the national level who “gets it”, who sees how politics have been corrupted so badly by corporate money ..."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes Laudy, I would have loved to see her letter to America during the Bush years when she was writing in Nader or Paul as well.

    I am going to dig to see if she really sees the paradigm from a coto type perspective. I will read the link you provided but what I have spent twenty years spouting about in the collusion of the red/blue extremists is being finally exposed by Obama for all to see.

    In some ways I almost appreciate his willingness to come accross so transparently in his every move. I only dread the surprise once even the most blinded come to the obvious light and ponder on what we will face.

    After reading the post, I cannot really expect that people had expected change. That was just another chicken in every pot soundbite.

    For me the only change was a focus on cleaning out the lobbyists and revoloving doors and getting us out of Iraq and Afghanistan.

    It would have been impossible for a liberal spending and welfare boost funded by a business wealthy tax increase. How can you fund the needy masses by stripping the wealthy and small business?

    WHAT A REAL PRESIDENT COULD HAVE DONE:

    (1) JOBS JOBS JOBS in realtor terms is everything. If he had hit that with a green thumb he might have had a chance to skip the Bush crimes spree and AF-PAK agenda. People working for a living wage and paying the bills with a little disposable income can sedate even the most savage Bush haters.

    (2) When looking clearly at the mess that Bush left, anyone thinking this was going to change without another FDR three termer and a real agenda free of Bilderberg and Committee indoctrination. We now have too much evidence that he had been groomed or tied to them now.
    This includes his fear of Israel and the AIPAC control over Congress. He could have charmed the Middle East and wrote his ticket. What does Israel mean to us financially? Just a liability.

    (3) Bailed out of Afghanistan and immediately reduced the defense spending debt in Iraq as well and sent Clinton and Biden to get Iran, Venezuela Iraq and Cuban relations repaired. And ask Russia for help without the UN in the mix.

    Had he attacked any of the three, I might have considered him a possible rogue from the JFK mold. Corrupt yes, but only on the superficial and maybe some real substance. But honestly he is less qualified than Carter was and Carter was a fish out of water and they ate him up. Poor Ronnie too. Babes in a den of wolves.

    Barry wants to live. He's doing nothing different and never intended to do so~ (IMO)

    ReplyDelete
  3. boomerangcomesbackJune 14, 2010 at 6:14 PM

    Barry is just another fascist puppet in "Blackface".

    I hope the Termites of Truth chew through the wooden exterior of these Gippetto puppets until they are sawdust soaking up the oil upon our floors.

    Gippetto's castoffs. Broken Liars dancing to their Illuminati tune.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with what she has to say about Obama but I wonder what her true politics are? Is she stil caught up in the left/right paradigm? The John Wayne/Jane Fonda remark left me wondering That comment smacks of right wing republican bs. Did she rail against Bush during his reign of terror?

    Yea, we should dig deeper to see where her roots are ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. The comment John Wayne/Jane Fonda wreaked of satire for extremists of both parties to me. I thought she was able to take a shot at both there.

    Regarding Slavery & Serfdom, I think she gets the fact we are all slaves though some were slaves of slaves of slaves. Barry is a slave of the committee, we the slaves of the system but we are free to die should we chose to do just as southern blacks in the past.

    There really was never any distinction in my mind. Not even down to the bill of sale or birth certificate. Citizen, Comrade, Boy, be a good one and you will be rewarded. Happy is we......





    ReplyDelete
  6. She has identified political correctness as a social evil. I hope to hear more from this fellow Paulite.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I would say it's a "double." Well... at least a "base hit." Maybe.

    She seems to be a "libertarian." More likely, an "objectivist." http://www.objectivistliving.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=7078 whatever the hell THAT means. There is a more "literary" take on the Ayn Rand Bible here: http://www.alternet.org/story/147133/like_glenn_beck,_ayn_rand_peddled_garbage_as_truth_--_why_did_america_buy_it/

    A few code-words reveal Wortham's "politics:" "The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs..." And who would THAT be? Wallace's "pointy-headed innelekshuals?" The Birch Society "eggheads" The "eletists?" Nobody... least of all a self-described "libertarian" has explained (to my satisfaction) just whathefuk "statist" means.

    Since most "libertarians" seem to be ex-"neocons" who have quickly pulled a sheet over their SA uniform... or to be more fair: people who are really embarrassed (now) to admit they "voted" for B$h... twice. There's a dissociative thing I don't understand: they fear "one-world government" and "statists," but purport to be defenders of the "Constitution" and "US soverignty." oh... and "states' rights." Umm... aint that "statism?"

    Back to Wortham: "I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the “bottom up,” and who arrogantly believes that he can will it into existence by the use of government force." Whew. Where does THAT come from? The Gospel of Fountainhead? The Apocrypha of Atlas Shrugged?

    "Wealth," Madam, INDEED comes from the "bottom up." Always has. Unless you cant understand the difference between toilet paper ("money") and food.

    "So, toast yourselves: 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians." Wow. Stereotype much there, Aunt Jemima? Servin' up them white-paper pancakes for the Ben Steins of the world who can't find the pans and batter? Ouch. I gotta admit... I fit every one of those decade-stereotypes. Oh wait... she forgot the 70s...what happened then?

    Well, I was also one of the 70s sell-outs. Why? Because it seemed the only alternative to death by COINTELPRO or being swept into the ballooning prison-industrial complex of your Saint Ronzo-style war-on-drugs "shining city" bent on imposing clean-pants "capitalism" by... you guessed it... "government force."

    So cry me a fucking river, lady, about "your freedom and mine – what little there is left – " ...because you and your John Galt Greenspan "capitalists" sold of most of that... to "create wealth"... for themselves. Oh yeah, and fuck Obama too. He has about as much to do with "'60s radicalism" as LBJerk-off's "Great Society (when YOU were probably 8 years old)." You just don't know nothin' bout birthin' no freedoms, do you lady?

    You should thank your Rand that "justice" is beyond human reach and "fairness" is what we get with sock-puppet Obama trying to pander to us (old "'60s radicals..." you know... the "bourgeois bohemians") now just like St. Ronzo did to you. The difference: most of us don't believe it. Never did.

    "Justice" will happen when the last "capitalist" is hung in the guts of the last bureaucrat... or when they both starve because they try to eat toilet paper. "All we are saying..." oh fuck it.

    I really am tired of arguing with "objectivists" like Wortham.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Waldo.. I'm agreeing with you here.(holy crap..really?!) I sense Ayn Randian roots in the good professor. I agree with much of what Wortham says but agree with most of what you point out in your comment.

    Like Prof Wortham, Ayn Rand's rantings had some good points mixed in with some very bad ones. In the end though, I believe Ayn Rand was just one self absorbed, selfish biatch which was manifested in her "objectivist philosophy."

    If Wortham has traveled down the Randy path than I will be taking a different route.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Holy crap! Really!?!

    Worthman has indeed taken the Randy Path. She seems to have carved her niche on the bedrock of conformity by being one of the few black intellectuals to challenge the idea that the civil rights movement did not come out all squeaky-clean.

    http://www.blackpast.org/?q=aah/wortham-anne-1941

    And I gotta apologize... she IS old enough to remember as an adult.

    I always get a burr up my ass with "stage-one intellectualism" or "well-DUH." I get it a lot with "English educators" who constantly harp on "objectivity" and tell students that "...ads don't necessarily tell the truth... they're trying to sell you something." Well- DUH.

    OR "...race consciousness is transformed into political strategies and issues, though intent on empowerment, undermine intellectual independence, individual rights, and economic and political freedom. The result is continued racial tension and African-Americans feeling disconnected from the society in which they live and function as citizens." Well- DUH.

    But, looking back on the "civil rights" or "anti-war" movement of the 60s... I still can't think of what could have been done differently... or more importantly... "better." Not that it should go without criticism... but we can always play parlor games with History. Just like WWI... or Nazi Germany... or hell... even the American War in Vietnam now seem now seem like inevitable fevers that had to run their course. It really escapes me why we have to keep doing them AGAIN.

    I have always told the kids... don't fuck up like I did. Fuck up in your own original way.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "...now seem now seem..." sheesh. read around the typos, please. sorry about that.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A few code-words reveal Wortham’s “politics:” “The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs…” And who would THAT be?

    How about Moonbeam Brown, most of California's elites, Reid Pelosi, two thirds of Congress and anyone else who thought skin color was a change or those who thinks they should decide for you and yet exclude themselves from those decisions.

    Libertarians are equally disenfrachised Democrats who realized their party has and always will be impotent. Teapartiers may be overwhelmingly ex-neocons set up to create a divide in the independent camp.

    Once again I can see an attempt to divide this expanding group by dividing them between teaparty's and pot smokers.

    Prof. Wortham addressed her point very well. Just a point though and I did not decide to decode it as WP did but any indication of objectivism is seems to merely identify the reality, the obvious and to address the problem of law or justice.

    This has been lost by all ist's. Getting bent on capitalism as the root cause is incorrect for me. If fairness and justice are served we may then move onto the rest of the problems.

    I appreciate her age and backgound not playing her role in determining that Obama represents NO JUSTICE at any level and that everyone she addresses were likely his supporters, ie. 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians and those who may be all wondering what happened.

    Anything else decoded is subjective and supposition from my view.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I dunno Patrick. The only thing I can find about her online is this piece that she wrote and that people on other blogs have commented on.

    Wanna laugh? I did find THIS Anne Wortham who also majored in sociology. In fact, she teaches it too!! lol

    http://www.annewortham.org/

    PS: If I MUSt be tagged,(and I hate these labels) I'd have to give myself the title progressive libertarian..lol.

    ReplyDelete
  13. That's a good one if you chose to have one. My Nolan test made me left leaning Lib too.

    Most of America swims around this little pool but the committee and their extremists seem to divide us with oceans. Oily ones at that ;)

    Wotham and Moyer - Conservative Randian? fine. She still turns me on! - I rest











    ReplyDelete
  14. How fortunate for her that she was born to a father who could afford to put her through college and her four siblings. My father was a white factory worker and didn't have the money to send me and my sister to dance class let alone college and I was from a lower class all white neighborhood not a drug infested ghetto. Not many kids living in black ghettos have the advantages that the professor had.

    While I agree everyone has the ability to better themselves in some way it's quite impossible to "pull yourself up by your boostraps" if you don't have bootstraps.

    Lucky is the poor child who can find their way out of the depths of poverty. It's not as easy as Ms Wortham seems to imply.

    As much as I think she has a lovely speaking voice, I find her annoying and her views simplistic and a bit pompous.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You mean Linda Ronstandt of the Freemason Mexican German Rondstadt family in Tuscon? She's a peach for sure.

    Moonbeams is a interesting duck but quacks like a guy I wouldn't want holding launch codes.

    I'd love to have socialist neighbors and we could trade back and forth the malcontents who always see the other side greener. Free to be wrong is a great thing.

    I'd play the comrade for awhile if I could jump ship at any time because I am wrong all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Linda Rondstadt a freemason??!! :O How about the stone ponies???

    ReplyDelete
  17. We can always find the ones who need help. I focus on the government not being that somebody to do it. I think she mentioned empowering social change outside of politics and thats where I agree.

    You can listen to the tripe of Jesse, Al and others who cant get their hands out of their own pockets. If anybody thinks that you can't work harder, study harder or get help from the so called "liberal help desk" by having them reach into their own stinking pockets and not mine. My money goes to those who cant walk.

    I am sorry for ghetto's such as the world has, but I aint seen the Harvard set moving them into their classrooms or homes. JOBS JOBS JOBS. That's where the exit is from the that hole.

    Political Welfare statism is a addiction like crack. It is given and accepted without appreciation and more is wanted. I'll pay more taxes to create them. That's not in the plan is it? is it?

    ReplyDelete
  18. btw Eggman, I really love the walrus, he's coo coo ka choo. If there was a webby for headers, you'd be a shoe in.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I don't have a tag. I yearn for both 'apprentice glutton' and 'primitive libertine', but am denied the first by 'health issues' and the second by beautiful young women who refuse any chance to probe their view that '75 is too old'.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks :) I felt a little like Paul at the moment I did that and was barefoot walking across an ocean. Not that I can walk on water but the oil surface made it possible.

    Arent you glad it was not yellow matter custard dripping from a dead dog eye and just an oily walrus?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Expert, texpert, choking smokers
    Don't you think the joker laughs at you

    ReplyDelete
  22. Po Mo was feelin' Randy

    But the ism schism just gave me a headache

    Just when you need a pornographic priestess

    Here comes Wortham talkin' like an upitty

    Semolina Pilchard

    ReplyDelete