Sunday, August 23, 2009

Shay´s Regulators defeated by the Massachusetts Militia

The year 1787 threatened ruin to the new United States from internal turmoil. It ended with the promise of greater union and strength in a new Constitution.The Regulators, as the rebels called themselves, sought to correct government and courts ridden with arbitrary and oppressive laws and excessive salaries for officials. Mobbing the court buildings in Concord, Worcester, Northampton, Great Barrington, and Springfield, they halted most court action.The August 29, 1786, storming of the Northampton courthouse successfully stopped the trial and imprisonment of many debtors. A month later, about 600 armed rebels stormed the Springfield courthouse. Massachusetts's Governor, James Bowdoin, quickly raised an army by private subscription of 4,400 militiamen under General Benjamin Lincoln to restore the courts and to protect the state.Captain Shays and several thousand veterans, along with about a thousand more men led by Luke Day of West Springfield, next targeted the Continental Arsenal at Springfield. A mix up, however, prevented Day and his regiment from joining Shays.  Day's message to Shays was intercepted by militia.

"A little rebellion now and then is a good thing. It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government. God forbid that we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion." T.J.



Daniel Shays (born ~1747 in Hopkinton, Massachusetts; died in New York 1825), Revolutionary War army captain recognized for gallantry by Lafayette, helped organize an insurrection against the government of Massachusetts. These were unsettled times of economic hardship and unfair laws. Ruinious property taxes, poll taxes that prevented poorer citizens from voting, unjust procedures of the Court of Common Pleas, costly law suits, and an unstable monetary system made day-to-day life more difficult than it had been before independence. The popular demand for the government issue of paper money was ignored by the state government. 

With the Revolutionary War over, the United States had yet to create a truly functional government. A planned Constitutional Convention was not certain while chaos spread.

The Regulators, as the rebels called themselves, sought to correct government and courts ridden with arbitrary and oppressive laws and excessive salaries for officials. Mobbing the court buildings in Concord, Worcester, Northampton, Great Barrington, and Springfield, they halted most court action.

The August 29, 1786, storming of the Northampton courthouse successfully stopped the trial and imprisonment of many debtors. A month later, about 600 armed rebels stormed the Springfield courthouse. Massachusetts's Governor, James Bowdoin, quickly raised an army by private subscription of 4,400 militiamen under General Benjamin Lincoln to restore the courts and to protect the state.

Captain Shays and several thousand veterans, along with about a thousand more men led by Luke Day of West Springfield, next targeted the Continental Arsenal at Springfield. A mix up, however, prevented Day and his regiment from joining Shays.  Day's message to Shays was intercepted by militia. 

General Lincoln had moved westward from Boston to defend the Worcester court while Shays and nearly 1,500 Regulators marched on the Arsenal late in the afternoon of January 25th, 1787. It was on the grounds of the Springfield Armory National Historic Site that the high-water mark of this violent and wide-spread rebellion, or “Regulation” as it was known at the time, crested in the bloody clash at the arsenal in an effort by the rebels to seize the barracks, cannon, muskets, and ammunition stored there.


 


The armed rebel column, of about three regiments, advanced from the east along Boston Road (now State Street) toward the militia emplaced on the grounds of Armory Square (the grass quadrangle in front of the Springfield Armory NHS Museum). Militia General William Shepard, defending the arsenal with about 1,200 local militiamen as the rebel column approached, fired his field pieces (a brass field gun and a howitzer) into the ranks of the advancing rebels, killing four and wounding many. The rebels never fired a musket nor did the defending militia. Crying "murder" -- for the insurgents never supposed their neighbors and fellow veterans would fire on them --, the Shays men retreated in disarray toward the north and east.


 


General Lincoln arrived in Springfield a few days later with reinforcements and quickly chased Shays's army northward. On the morning of February 3rd, the insurgents were taken completely by surprise in Petersham, Massachusetts. General Lincoln had marched his troops from Hadley through a snowstorm the previous night to attack as Shays and his men sat down to breakfast. The regulators scattered, and the rebellion was effectively ended with some fighting and bloodshed continuing in the months ahead in the Berkshire hills to the west.


 


Most of the insurgents later took advantage of a general amnesty and surrendered. Shays and a few other leaders escaped north to Vermont.


The Supreme Judicial Court sentenced fourteen of the rebellion's leaders, including Shays, to death for treason. However, they were later pardoned by the newly-elected Governor John Hancock. Only two men, John Bly and Charles Rose of Berkshire County, were hung (for banditry).


 


A newly-elected Massachusetts Legislature began to undertake the slow work of reform. And that summer the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia struggled to create a stronger central government that would "establish justice and insure domestic tranquillity." Shays's Rebellion is considered the one of the major turning points leading to the formation of the United States Constitution.


-Richard Colton, historian, Springfield Armory NHS-



 










Daniel Shays and Job Shattuck, two leaders of the 1786-87 rebellion in Massachusetts known as Shays's Rebellion (from a 1787 newspaper image).









BICKERSTAFF'S BOSTON ALMANACK for 1787.
Daniel Shays, pictured on the left, took a leading role in the unsuccessful movement in central and western Massachusetts for redress of grievances, leading 1,200 men in a failed attempt to seize Springfield Arsenal on January 25th, 1787. Job Shattuck, seen on the right, was a leader of the rebellion in eastern Massachusetts.



http://www.nps.gov/spar/historyculture/shays-rebellion.htm

5 comments:

  1. The message... revolutionaries are criminals if the fail, heros if they succeed.

    Thanks for posting this!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did You notice ? "Captain Shays and several thousand veterans, " It was veterans of WW1 that marched on DC for benefits not recieved. It was veterans that were approached By Sterling P. Bush to kill FDR and overthrow the gubmint. It was veterans and police that were killed by Hitler and Stalin after they did the dirty-work of taking down the gubmint. Mao and Pot too. Veterans are being closely monitored and their personal weapons inventoried AS WE SPEAK. Even the VFW is threatened with jail if they dont produce accurate inventories of their aircraft carriers,planes,cannons and ceremonial rifles.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unfortunately I fear that Shays revolution rather back-fired on the attepts of the common man to get justice against the monied elite of his time. I believe that he provoked a coup which lead to a new constitution far less democratic than it might have been and which has entrenched an oligarchy in the US ever since. My post at http://theoligarchkings.wordpress.com of today explores this further should you be interested.

    Many thanks for an interesting blog site

    David

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for visiting David. We hope you visit again soon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Shay Regulators were not "rebels". Their public servants were the rebels who were violating the law they had consented to in order to have a government job.

    The Shay Regulators were regulating their government agents. In the real America, public servants are the agents of the American Man who is the Principal, and responsible for the acts of the agent.

    Those who consented to and carried out the assassination of the noble Men of Massachusetts, engaged on controlling vicious, cruel, covetous, rebellious servants, were the criminals.

    And this criminal usurpation of the American Revolution, led to the Constitution, designed to keep everyone down under the control of what was supposed to be public servants.

    In the Declaration of Rights, 1774, American Men, said that they never consented to be governed. But since the Constitution of No Authority was imposed, they tell us we Americans consented to be governed by covetous, war crazy bureaucrats and politicians.

    It is said, "All Men are created equal." When we recognize that hoodlums, robbers, and such are not men, it begins to make sense.

    ReplyDelete