Thursday, June 18, 2009

Obama Regulatory Reform Plan Officially Establishes Banking Dictatorship In United States

federal_reserve_eagle.cr.03

Move to hand privately-owned Federal Reserve complete regulatory power over entire U.S. economy heralds new form of government

Paul Joseph Watson & Steve Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, June 18, 2009

President Obama’s plan to give the privately-owned and unaccountable Federal Reserve complete regulatory oversight across the entire U.S. economy, which is likely to be enacted before the end of the year, will officially herald the beginning of a new form of government in the United States - an ultra-powerful banking dictatorship controlled by a small gaggle of shadowy and corrupt elitists.


The new rules would see the Fed given the authority to “regulate” any company whose activity it believes could threaten the economy and the markets.


This goes a step further than the centrally planned economies of the Soviet Union or Communist China, in that the Federal Reserve is not even accountable to the U.S. government, it is a private entity that according to former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, is accountable to nobody but the banking families that own it.


Obama’s regulatory “reform” plan is nothing less than a green light for the complete and total takeover of the United States by a private banking cartel that will usurp the power of existing regulatory bodies, who are now being blamed for the financial crisis in order that their status can be abolished and their roles handed over to the all-powerful Fed.


According to an Associated Press report today, Democratic leaders have committed to enacting the plan before the end of the year and Republicans in both the House and Senate have indicated that they won’t stand in the way of the overhaul.


“The final plan….is expected to sidestep most jurisdictional disputes and simply impose across the board standards to be applied by all financial regulators, according to administration and industry sources, ” reports the Washington Times.


In other words, the Fed, which is already totally unaccountable to Congress, is to be placed in complete control of the entirety of the U.S. financial system, to do as it wishes without repercussion.


As the LA Times reports, the government, in conjunction with the private Federal Reserve, would effectively have the clout to simply seize and take over any company it desires.


In order to appease those opposed to the plan, such as Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, chairman of the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, the Obama administration has agreed to create a “watchdog” council of regulators to “advise the Fed”.


However, as former chairman Alan Greenspan has most recently pointed out, given that the Fed is an independent entity, and therefore accountable to no one, it will have the power to simply reject and overrule any advice it is offered.


Pointing out the flagrant conflict of interest in empowering the Federal Reserve to essentially regulate itself, Professor of public affairs at the University of Texas at Austin Robert Auerbach writes, “The Federal Reserve has massive conflicts of interest that make it ill suited for its present regulatory functions and certainly for an expanded regulatory reach. The officials leading the Fed today preside over an organization that is run in substantial part by the bankers they regulate. Bank regulation begins at its 12 district Federal Reserve Banks, each governed by a nine-member board of directors, two-thirds of whom are elected by the bankers in the district.”


As economic author Nomi Prins highlights, Obama’s plan does nothing whatsoever to fix the excesses of financial institutions blamed for the financial collapse, it only ensures their continued operation and an expansion of the practices that contributed to the economic crisis in the first place.


“The ’sweeping overhaul’ of the financial system detailed by Geithner on behalf of the Obama administration does not overhaul the system at all,” writes Prins, “giving the Fed a bigger role, creating a ‘council of regulators’ to oversee the existing oversight bodies and allowing the biggest Wall Street players to maintain their status, leaves the system intact.”


“The Federal Reserve is not a fully public entity. It has amassed a set of $7.87 trillion worth of facilities and other entities through which it has lavished cheap loans in return for questionable collateral from the banking system. It has kept the true nature of these transactions a secret despite numerous FOIA requests. And, it has actively promoted the creation of bigger institutions in a chaotic environment, rather than putting the brakes on the creation of these giants,” concludes Prins.


Proof that the agenda of implementing overt financial dictatorship is being carefully coordinated can be seen in the fact that an almost identical scheme is also being set up in the United Kingdom, where “The governor of the Bank of England has called for greater powers to allow it to fulfil its new role of promoting financial stability,” according to a BBC report.


Just as in the U.S., King is calling for traditional independent regulatory bodies to be all but abolished and replaced by the Bank of England itself, which just like the Federal Reserve is a private outfit with no accountability to the government whatsoever.


The mainstream media, for the most part, has reported the oversight plan as a much needed regulatory crackdown on those responsible for the financial crisis. However, the details of the plan constitute almost exactly what lobbyists for leading bankers have been pushing for over the past few weeks.


“All derivatives contracts will be subject to regulation and all derivatives dealers subject to supervision,” Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said at a Time Warner Economic Summit in New York on Monday, also noting “When you have too many people involved, there’s an accountability problem.”


As we reported earlier this month, heads of nine of the biggest banks in the derivatives market, including JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Bank of America, secretly lobbied to keep derivatives under Federal Reserve “oversight” and away from real scrutiny.


As reported by The New York Times, they all met secretly to discuss how to use the lax regulation and institutional secrecy of the NY Fed to shield their credit-default swaps business from prying eyes and attempts at regulation.


The banks formed a lobby– the CDS Dealers Consortium– only weeks after accepting TARP funds in October 2008 to protect its interests. Heading this effort was Edward Rosen, who previously helped fend off derivatives regulation. Rosen wrote and circulated a “confidential memo” to the Treasury Department and leaders on Capital Hill, making their agenda clear, the Times reported.



Rosen and his backers propose that derivatives be “traded in privately managed clearinghouses, with less disclosure,” according to the Times. The clearinghouse of choice for the big banks in Rosen’s CDS Consortium is ICE U.S. Trust, which is in turned regulated only by the Federal Reserve system.

So the upshot of all this is that the bankers get what they want, are allowed to carry on as they were, while at the same time the fractional reserve banking system and the federal government are both greatly expanded and empowered, and the compliant corporate media ludicrously tells us that a strict crackdown is underway.

This kind of activity is exactly what some leading representatives have warned of in recent weeks.


A fortnight ago, the Democratic Chairman of the Agriculture Committee, Collin Peterson, announced to the press that “The banks run the place,” in reference to the US Congress.


While Peterson is also pushing for legislation to regulate derivatives trading, his proposed bill would limit derivatives trading to public exchanges, rather than private clearinghouses, which are managed by banks.



Peterson’s warning mirrors that of Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, who just a few weeks before uttered the same rarely acknowledged truth.

“And the banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place,” Durbin said.

How simultaneously dangerous and ridiculous it is that the Federal Reserve is given more authority to oversee the economy. This is the same privately run entity that refused to comply with congressional demands for transparency and disclose the destination of trillions dollars in bailout funds. It is the same privately owned entity that has withheld internal memos, in spite of freedom of information act requests. It is the same private entity, run for the most part by European banking elites, that has arrogantly refused to tell Senators and Congressmen which banks were in receipt of government loans.

The government is ready to hand over everything to a monolithic private corporation and a gaggle of bastard banker offspring, that have gobbled up an amount close to the entire GDP of the country in taxpayers’ money and figuratively stuck the middle finger up regarding questions over where that money has gone.

It can be no more apparent than at this time that legislation to audit, repeal and eventually end the Federal Reserve, must be supported by Americans if they want to see their children and their grandchildren grow up without indentured debt and entrenched servitude to a fascistic marriage of private banks and hugely inflated government.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. COTO HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS COTO ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

19 comments:

  1. If this legislation is enacted ... it will be the final nail in the Republic's coffin. And we ... and our children's children's children will be debt slaves forever.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Welcome to the "United Banks of America"

    If this is allowed to happen, it's over. These pigs are pushing hard because they know that people are waking-up to what's going on.

    If we don't push back, and push back HARD NOW, this time next year half of us won't be around to protest.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No kidding.. How is that "audit the fed" bill coming along? I can't freaking believe this.. I really can't..we know it's gonna pass..don't we?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I actually think that they not only don't give a f*ck about us anymore, but that they actually have a visible disdain for those of us who don't just accept the fact that it is all a sham and let them go on lying to the remaining "believers" out there.

    It's like they look at us as if to say "hey, this is our scam! stop messin with it and find your own".

    It's gonna get really bad, really fast. Someone around here needs to broach the "buy a compound" topic sometime real soon... I hear there's land in Waco...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ok, seriously... what's wrong with Twinkies? I understand the Oreos and the Prozac lookin stuff and the Pepsi and all, but Twinkies? What are you people, heathens?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rady, Scott.. I actually have a friend who has ten acres of land on the water in canada who has always said she wanted to start a commune of like minded people. I'm thinkin maybe it's time to take her up on it.

    How much time do you think we have before the big hammer drops?

    Scott, twinkies are disgusting.. yuk...you can have the twinkies and I'll take the oreos......

    ReplyDelete
  7. No. Now we buy yaks. Many, many Yaks. and plows.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why put off til tomorrow... I started packing an hour ago... and that is a deal on the Oreos... the Twinkies will last about 10,000 times longer.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Policy that breeds poverty and crime can only survive if democracy is suppressed." Arbatov

    In a slash and burn Chicago School style economic reform, the politicians have to protect and then secure the oligarchs' looting for the long term, by eroding the very foundations of that democracy that this new "moderate" system of theirs is replacing.

    Otherwise, there is always the threat that democracy could be rekindled by the survivors, or learned all over again by future generations. To them it's like removing a weed; if you don't kill the root the first time, you just have to come back and do it again. Look at what they did to all the historical documents and artifacts in Iraq.

    What we are watching is the extermination of democracy, one nation at a time.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh, and since you are playing musical chairs with the banner up there, I would hope (hint hint) that someone would do a banner out of that "I LIVE IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER!" pic I made... That would be nice with the COTO logo, floating around the internets for a couple hundred years...

    ReplyDelete
  11. find a treed area. buy el cheapo shipping containers, scrape out land use scraped soil to cover them. safer sheilded, near invisible, solid and can be lived in quite well, airvent and fluing are acheivable with a grinder or oxy. ditto smaller doorways window tubes whatever. they are selling cheap as not much use sending empties for a voyage:-)
    If you get 2 and space em apart use C Channel beams over top and create a 3rd space for near free, to sit outside , or store car whatever.
    thats what I plan for my place, handy in fire and if on higher ground , flood too. should shit not hit..hmm no way its not going to splatter really though, is there?
    bullet proof on 3 sides, and defensible.
    Peace of mind.

    ReplyDelete
  12. canada a bad idea---northern minn. is a much better place--------dont forget the long johns--and books on how to convert a city person to a country bumkin--one of the abandoned mines would make a much better place to holdup in--be surprised how warm it is down there--

    ReplyDelete
  13. i like my idea of an abandoned mine better==yours is defenseless----

    ReplyDelete
  14. Purrr..... Will our congress do anything? HR 1207 has been referred to the House Committee on Financial Services so what are they waiting for?

    The chairman for the House Committee on Financial services is Barney Frank
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_Frank

    The chairman for the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs is Chris Dodd
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Dodd

    The chairman for the Senate Committee on Finance is Max Baucus
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Baucus

    The Speaker of the House is the infamous,
    "Off the Table" Nancy Pelosi
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Pelosi

    If it gets through both the House and the Senate then it must be sign into law by the PresOdent
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

    All Democrats, the majority in the House and Senate, with a sitting democratic President.

    If HR 1207 gets buried, I'd say there's nothing left to do but cry. Party's over.
    By de facto we no longer have a representative
    form of government.....(dis kitty's not purr'n)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ok, so I have to find an abandoned mine in Northern Minn?.I might need the help of Minnesotan Michael Cavlan for that one...

    ReplyDelete
  16. I love the rotating header pix... I look forward to seeing what Patrick will put up next.. that monkey is adorable but I can't quite make out what creature is holding the flag... I think my monitor sux or I'm going blind.. probably both.. lol

    ReplyDelete
  17. PS: I think RK in a van down by the river is hysterical Scott..lol

    ReplyDelete
  18. That's why we have to figure out how to stop this slide into tyranny. We don't want our grandchildren growing up and asking the same questions asked of the German people during Hitler's reign.. "Why didn't they do something?"

    ReplyDelete
  19. Consider the presumptuousness in the banking lobby involving itself and insisting that its interests be served in Congress as it fashions financial regulatory reform. That they are in any position to be part of that process is beyond at least John Galbraith. If you are interested, here is my post: http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/the-banking-lobby-on-the-presumptuousness-of-pushiness/

    ReplyDelete