Tuesday, June 23, 2009

9/11 FEMA videographer at Ground Zero goes public

KSportrait400-3

As official videographer for the U.S. government, Kurt Sonnenfeld was detailed to Ground Zero on September 11, 2001, where he spent one month filming 29 tapes: "What I saw at certain moments and in certain places ... is very disturbing!" He never handed them over to the authorities and has been persecuted ever since. Kurt Sonnenfeld lives in exile in Argentina, where he wrote « El Perseguido » (the persecuted). His recently-published book tells the story of his unending nightmare and drives another nail into the coffin of the government’s account of the 9/11 events.

Read more at Voltairenet.org

40 comments:

  1. ummmm yea.. and more pictures ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I trust you're aware that the hunky, chunky, dreamy... dude is charged with the first-degree murder of his first wife - http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_5555425,00.html ?

    Of course, Mr. Sonnenfeld of the Val Kilmer chin/mouth, has been framed by... the government... in an attempt to silence his 9/11 knowledge... right? Mind you, he never mentioned the now "dark forces" aligned against him during the initial charges and interview after his first release. The 9/11 accusations came later in Argentina.

    On the whole, Mr. Sonnenfeld is not a solid "witness", but elevate him if you must. Make sure, though, you downplay the murder charges because that's what Alex (The Man) Jones did in his interview with Mr. Sonnoenfeld - http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-fema-videographer-at-ground-zero-goes-public.html . Naturally, it was suicide... or was that also done at the hands of dark forces...?

    Here's some more eye candy of the alleged murderer/patriot:

    http://lh5.ggpht.com/_5TyKePYfTXY/SfM8rVvwS6I/AAAAAAAAAeQ/ME3hQhqqA8g/sonnenfeld_groundzero2.jpg

    http://ipsnoticias.net/fotos/familia.jpg

    http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/sonnenfeld/art/couple250.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is HUGE! I predict there will be a movie, perhaps starring Brad Pitt! If they can sensationalize this story, they can minimize the seriousness of its impact. Their tactics betray their
    motives.....

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't care about any of that. I want to see those videos. I want to see raw footage of Ground Zero. They didn't keep photographers out because of the vault under Building 6, they kept them out so no one would accidentally film a piece of equipment used in the demolition process...

    I would LOVE to get my hands on that footage... or to go meet him and go over it frame by frame...

    ReplyDelete
  5. LOE" should be 'LOVE" if anyone can change that for me... thanks

    ReplyDelete
  6. I find it interesting that you seem to want to address just that one part of the man's story. His reporting that the vault under Building 6 was empty and obviously cleared out before the attacks might be a little interesting to you, huh?

    How about the fact that he was called just a few minutes after the first plane struck the North Tower? FEMA get involved in accidental plane crashes that often?

    But all that aside, what this guy did or didn't do is meaningless... I don't care if he killed a million people by faking reasons to start an illegal war of aggression for natural resources (any of those guys running around free, that you know of?)...

    What he says is pointless.... if he still has the footage... now THAT is a different story. That is important.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tom, good to see you on a more credible website.

    I really am trying my hardest to understand your point about the "first-degree murder of his first wife". Exactly where does this fall on the "relative" scale, where at one end are the hundreds of thousands of US mercenaries (dressed like...well...dressed like you Tom) who are blowing women and children to bits and pieces on an hourly basis?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well, well, well, look who deigned to comment.. for what, only the second time since he's joined up?

    Does anyone else find it odd that Mr Murphy just popped out of the woodwork, like a cockroach, only to comment on 9/11 as he always did on oen? Of course, he starts spewing his anti 9/11 truth bs immediately. Very strange. Very strange indeed.

    You're not fooling anyone here Murphy. We're not like the little kool aide drinkers at oen. Everyone here knows from years of research that 9/11 was an inside job. So you can just go back to oen to peddle your disinfo.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Scott, Murphy's job is to discredit any 9/11 story that doesnt fit the govt fairytale. He spent most of his time on oen doing just that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh Mark, come on now. It's ok to blow up women and children as long as it's OUR government doing it. Get with the program !! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Face it Murph, the guy is a hunk and you're just jealous.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAnGYBmnTPY

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jersey and Rady

    Ummmm will you two please keep your drooling to a minimum please?

    LOLOL

    Oh and Jersey, Re Mr Murphy

    Please, tell us how you really feel.

    Don't hold anything back.

    //:-D>----------

    Here is to no more Kool Aid.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Gee Murhpy, you copy and pasted a bit too quickly. AJ didn't interview him. That interview is a reposting of the same one I posted here, from Voltaire that DID interview him. Also, it's obvious you didn't even read it. There was abundant evidence that he didn't kill his wife and she did indeed commit suicide. She left a note and a journal of suicidal thoughts. Rady is of course correct. The government has a nasty habit of smearing those that are out to expose their dastardly deeds.

    That video is to be produced soon. Then we can judge it on it's merits.

    Btw, very sloppy work on your part Tommy Boy. That's not like you, you're slipping.

    ReplyDelete
  14. lol Irish. Hey, I drool over your picture too!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yea, Munich. Ain't that a kick in the a** to the government's fairytale? There are so many people that were warned ahead about the attacks that day. So much evidence of foul play that day, that only a sheeple or disinfo agent could possibly refuse to admit it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Don't know Rady. We can't make a decision until they "roll the tape." I don't think anyone here is that gullible. We want to see actual proof of what he's saying.

    But isn' it odd some are so willing to immediately cast aspersions when one hasn't even read the article. That definitely proves something, doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Tommy... it's so obvious to all of us you're a govt shill. Why? You're a one topic guy. Why not broaden your horizons a little? While you can say your piece here, sorry, no one buys it! I think you're better off at oen. I think they need you there :)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Tom;

    In case you haven't figured it out yet, by coming in here and ONLY talking about the guy and the supposed murder of his wife (why did they release him again?) what you are doing in fact is proving his point that it was all just a ploy to immediately discredit anything he says.

    Aside from the obvious fact that it has absolutely nothing to do with his testimony about what he saw while working at Ground Zero, your attempt to use this issue as a ad hom smear campaign lends credibility to his argument.

    A lot of credibility.

    Do you get it? Sometimes, if you're going to be an effective shill, you have to apply a little tact and be patient. Jumping right out there into the fray with the smear cover story only serves to blow YOUR cover, not his....

    BTW... welcome to COTO.

    ReplyDelete
  19. even I raised an eyebrow:-)
    haven't got the energy to drool!
    Id rather the british or canadians made a doco about him and the film. possible be credible then.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It's been part of the official timeline for years now. It's the one that compels any intelligent person to, "dig here." But once the building 7 footage made the light of day, there really wasn't any point in chasing down the FEMA tale. Everyone knows the explosives were preplanted. "Oh, FEMA showed up the night before? Well, there were a NUMBER of terror drills planned for the following day -- A

    After Malloy read one of my 9/11 missives on the air a guy with a strong Turkish accent phoned from Chicago -- sounded kinda lit -- and tried to float the turd that ALL tall buildings have pre-positioned explosives in them in case of some unforeseen natural disaster. It was the end of the show, but it sort of flummoxed Mike.

    The guy was obviously a spook and what's weird is he sounded like a guy who'd I'd seen for months at a local social club I always went to. He'd try to engage me me in casual conversation and I pretty much complied -- my life's an open book and I was going through a really tough time job-wise. He said he was doing IT work in Turkey, but he just didn't fit any IT profile I'd ever seen before. I gave him my resume and he disappeared before getting back to me.

    As it turns out, there are some interesting Turkish connections to 9/11 as Sibel Edmonds later explained. Interesting Argentinian ones, too. And, of course, Texas and its corrupt "judicial" system.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Jersey Girl...you know I love you, right? This is a huge scoop.

    BTW...AJ is a shill, too. He's all about misdirection and amplification of the wrong issues. It's not the NWO and the banks that are the problem...it's the g-d families that OWN the banks that are the problem. Politicians and banksters are just useful idiots to these families, and they are paid handsomely for their self-betrayal.

    I was thinking we need to shut Tom out, but, then I thought, "they'll just send in someone even MORE effective than him to trip us up." Frankly I think he's a better deal for us. If he were too smart he'd have us shut down inside of a week...it took him months to get Moffet and Rob towing the Company line. And Moffet WORKS for the federal government for crissakes!

    As long as Tom is here doing his despicable duty, no one else will be assigned. I'm good with that.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hey Vol... yes we're a big loving family here ;) Our pack of wolves can handle Tommy Boy, no doubt. His sh** doesn't fly here. We're not oen shills & sheeple he likes to pontificate to.

    As for AJ. He talks all about the bankster families. He goes to Bilderberg meetings and bullhorns rockefeller. He knows who rules.. What are ya talkin about? Pretty much everything I've learned about the nwo and the ruling elite he set me on the trail of. I have much respect for the man. I have yet to see any disinfo from AJ.

    So many say this about alex, yet none offer any real evidence of it. I just don't see it and I'm not one to buy bs from anyone let alone some guy on a radio show.

    Which btw is why I stopped listening to Malloy during the election and haven't listened to him since. He turned out to be nothing but a shill for Obama and the corrupt dems. It's all about the republicans with him now. And whatever happened to his pursuing 9/11 truth? That quickly fell to the wayside. I lost the huge amount of respect I had for Mike. I was hooked..but no more.

    ReplyDelete
  23. don't know who moffet is "volaar" and i imagine the crew here is suspicious of someone who works for the federal government...

    but...wonder what they think about someone like yourself who works for a war machine like BOEING?

    ReplyDelete
  24. It's pretty Obvious that there are and will be people joining COTO who are here strictly to disrupt, turn people on each other and report.
    It's up to all of us who know who we are to become aware, keep some conversations to ourselves and cover ourselves.
    Some people are going to be obvious, such as someone who wearshis boy scout beret in his picture. Others, like someone who is casting aspersion on another with nothing more than an "I think he might be" reasoning should also come under scrutiny.
    We can put up with these people but we also need our own chain of communication.
    Personally,, I despise these type of ass wipes. They have nothing but bad intentions and we must be aware when we encounter one.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I hear ya Peter and I concur.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Dude is a hunk!

    Where was I? Ah, yes. The most important part;

    Kurt Sonnenfeld: Yes, but not immediately. With so much chaos, it was difficult to think. It was only after digesting everything that the “alarm bells” went off.
    Building Six was evacuated within twelve minutes after the first airplane struck the North Tower. The streets were immediately clogged with fire trucks, police cars and blocked traffic, and the vault was large enough, 15 meters by 15 meters by my estimate, to necessitate at least a big truck to carry out its contents. And after the towers fell and destroyed most of the parking level, a mission to recover the contents of the vault would have been impossible. The vault had to have been emptied before the attack.

    I’ve described all of this extensively in my book, and it’s apparent that things of importance were taken out of harm’s way before the attacks. For example, the CIA didn’t seem too concerned about their losses. After the existence of their clandestine office in Building Seven was discovered, an agency spokesman told the newspapers that a special team had been dispatched to scour the rubble in search of secret documents and intelligence reports, though there were millions, if not billions of pages floating in the streets. Nevertheless, the spokesman was confident. “There shouldn’t be too much paper around,” he said.

    Paper shredder party on 8, 9, 10 Sept. 2001??

    What does this tell us?

    I'll tell you what this tells us.

    It was an inside job, period.

    Get over it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. and as an adendum,,,, I think I might be a little jealous of that guy too!

    ReplyDelete
  28. There is no room, or point, to an argument over whether or not the attacks were known about and the circumstances taken advantage of in a horrendous way.
    Tony, of ccourse, you are 100% correct.
    We should ignore, not even respond to any other theory, it's a waste of time.
    What we need to do is find ways to get the goddam thing investigaedd once and for all.
    The entire bush administration is guily of horrible crimes against humanity. Not only 9-11 but a needless war killing thousands among other things.
    If we can get a conviction those people have a terrific song to sing which will put out the names of the criminals who gave the orders. There are a lot of wealthy people, the Elite, who would be exposed for complicity and show the worl who really runs the show. This is the only way to take back our Nation short of just putting little things in the heads of big Bankers.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I actually agree with you Peter about disrupters (though I'd like to think we all are in other venues).

    But there are also some who are looking for a little truth, have been visiting, reading and maybe even sitting on a few things until they spot hypocrisy and decide to shed some light on it. As far as I'm concerned, there's no "he might be" question, but Obviously I'm not in the in-crowd and you can do what you want with that.

    Or maybe you think it's just fine to work for Boeing while spouting off about the military industrial complex and people who work for the fed. Doesn't fly with me personally.

    Maybe Volaar would be willing to put it to rest.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Freedom,
    The only "in crowd" here are truthers. People who don't want to shovel the Establishment's shit, nor do we want to spread it.
    I'm 100% about who I am as are others here. If you want to walk with blinders and defend the government, bush, the military industrial complex, wal-mart or any other entity that is OBVIOUSly fucking up our country then you're an outsider.
    We are about common sense, bottom line. If you're here and believe in the obvious, which is really what common sense is, then you, Brother, are COTO.
    There will be those, as I said, who lie and pretend but remember who we are. They wiil be habitually ridiculed, scorned and dismissed. We will always know, maybe not right away, but sooner or later, who's a shill and who's COTO.

    ReplyDelete
  31. say what? i've got blinders on? how in the world did i defend the government exactly or the MIC? i took offense that someone who works for a component of the MIC has the nerve to call other people out - that's all bro.

    ReplyDelete
  32. p.s. i'm happy to let it go. like i said i spot hypocrisy and like the rest of you don't digest it very well and i spit it out. that's all. i'm perfectly happy to move on. shared what i thought ought to be shared. i'll head back over to the corner now and catch up on my reading ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  33. Freedom,
    I wasn't questioning your integrity, not in the least.
    I was making reference to your comment that you weren't with the in-crowd. I was only putting that to rest.
    Please, read it again and think in terms of "I'm on your side". I'm sorry that I may have not made myself clear. Please forgive.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Moffet the muppet is an oen editurd.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Ha ha! Exactly what I thought when I saw the pix...

    Can we all persecute him some more? waaa haaa

    ReplyDelete
  36. Oh, shit! Just when I thought it was safe...

    Brrrrrraaaains...send more braaaaaaaains...

    ReplyDelete
  37. gotcha. thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  38. It is a shame what happened to this man. The feds have a history of this sort of thing when one of their own turn on them. There is no telling how many former military men are behind bars for the same thing.

    ReplyDelete