Try this link http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/news.php?q=1406129916 rather than the pakalert link. It was attempting to download a massive jar of cookies.
Anyways, COTO KNOWS the "official story" signed off on by Bush, Jr. & his gang, Congress, and now Oblamo's administration is an "official lie" of terribly treasonous proportions.
[caption id="attachment_25761" align="aligncenter" width="500"]
Bending the Truth all out of proportion[/caption]
--"Don Fox and I went to Gordon Duff who introduced us to a senior US Army/NATO officer who had commanded nuclear forces in Europe. He concurred that 9/11 was nuclear, answered what he could and helped direct us onward."~Ian Greenhallgh
ReplyDeleteJust a question Boomer; What do you think of the use of anonymous sources when they are claimed on MSM? Especially what do you figure when you know the MSM presenter is a known liar?
Gordon Duff is a known liar. Donald Fox is a known liar, all of the people involved in this science fantasy bullshit are known liars, James Fetzer can be pointed to specifically on this.
You read this bullshit that you don't understand and lay it out as though it were really in some way reasonable. It is not, it is blatant disinformation agitprop.
The article below is the inspiration for the science fiction story told by Fox, Greenhallgh, and Duff:
arXiv:0901.2993v1 [physics. soc-ph] 20 Jan 2009
“The physical principles of thermonuclear explosives, inertial confinement fusion, and the quest for fourth generation nuclear weapons
Andre Gsponer and Jean-Pierre Hurni Independent Scientific Research Institute Box 30, CH-1211 Geneva-12, Switzerland January 20, 2009
This report is an assessment of the prospect of developing new (i.e., fourth generation) nuclear weapons in the context of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) that was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1996 and of the current moratorium on nuclear testing in effect in all nuclear-weapon States.
The fourth chapter is devoted to fourth generation nuclear weapons. These new fission or fusion explosives could have yields in the range of 1 to 100 ton equivalents of TNT, i.e., in the gap which today separates conventional weapons from nuclear weapons. These relatively low-yield nuclear explosives would not qualify as weapons of mass destruction.”
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"..the quest for fourth generation nuclear weapons.." *-- it's right there in the title of the scientific paper.
The reader will note that this dialog pertaining to Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons is all framed in the future-tense. In other words the whole thing is based on conjecture; what might be developed within the next 20 years or so.
And this is why it fits so perfectly into the agitprop game — all of it is conjecture, supposition and rhetorical spin. They pretend that they don't have to prove any of this bullshit. It’s a big happy MAYBE, and that is all that matters to chumps and con-men.
*Quest – noun 1. a search or pursuit made in order to find or obtain something: a quest for uranium mines; a quest for knowledge.
dictionary.reference.com/browse/quest
\\][//
Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories
ReplyDeleteBy David Ray Griffin
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contrast this real information, the testimony of first responders and other nearby witnesses, and how it adds up to controlled demolitions having all the signature characteristics of previous demolitions of high rise steel framed buildings.
Now compare this to the empty assertions based on unnamed sources, building a science fiction story based on the report by Andre Gsponer and Jean-Pierre Hurni.
Duff and Fox are poisonous people telling stories they made up.
http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/news.php?q=1330017992
\\][//
As far as my thinking on 9/11, I suppose it is similar to yours. I think the case is cracked. That is solved by open source research. I think it can be said to be one of a cycle of false flag events that fit the MO of the elite hegemon squatting verily upon the head of the peoples of this world. It does retain the quality of “prime example” and proximate point for a paradigm shift put in play through it. Thus it is of critical import to understand.
ReplyDeleteBut it is in those pesky little details, that some claim do not matter to the big picture, that actually do matter very much. And the aspect of ‘divisions’ drawn by argument over these details… does consensus trump the full truth? These are heady issues that have gone ’round and ’round in many conversations throughout the post event years.
\\][//
I put it up, and ask, "What do you think?" to readers. Just about everything I've seen that is "allowed" to bubble up to the surface regarding 9/11 is disinfo in part or whole in my estimation. My firm belief is Bush, jr, Jeb Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and cadre are dirty -- one might say some have dirty hands, dirty heads, dirty hearts, and dirty feet on how involved they were. Some are soiled head to foot (Bush, sr.). I say Israel (Zionist Neocons, MIC, Financial players, embedded policy makers then {PNAC}, and subsequently in administrations, policy positions, etc) was instrumental. Saudi's too (Bush Family linkage). Clintons as well, and "others".
ReplyDeleteThe "How" is still best (for me) for guys like you to illustrate, as you are extremely well studied on this subject. See...I pretty much know you'll pop in and call BS or make a statement. Its kind of like your "Public Service" announcement if you will. (grin)
Thanks Boomer. I actually had the suspicion that this was an opportunity provided by you to set the issue in context as a "Public Service Announcement".
ReplyDeleteAppreciate that Boomer.
\\][//