DD
Form 3206 (Rev 2/96)
JOINT
SERVICES TRAINING COMBAT ARMS
SURVEY
link
QUESTION
# 46
"I
Would Fire Upon U.S.
Citizens..."
The RESISTER has
confirmed that US Navy SEAL
platoons,
including SEAL Team Six, Marine combat
veterans
stationed at Twenty-Nine Palms, CA, and Marine
basic
trainees at Camp Pendelton , CA , have been
administered
a
questionnaire asking, among other things, if
they would "...fire upon US citizens who refuse
or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the
US
government."
The
questionnaire was first administered to
operators
by
the commanders of SEAL Team Six on 15 September
1993, then subsequently to the remaining SEAL
platoons throughout September and October.
Rumors began circulating in November that US
Army DELTA operators were given the same or
similar questionnaire. The SF Underground had
been aware of the questionnaire since late
September but our observers had been unable to
secure a copy or confirm other than its
substance consisted of questions pertaining to
the subordination of the US Military to the UN
and confiscation of the firearms of US citizens.
In early January, 1994, we obtained a copy of
the questionnaire from one of our DOD
sympathizers but lacking corroboration we ran
the story in Vol.I, No.1 of The RESISTER as a
rumor.On January 22, 1994, one of our
observers copied a chilling message off the
Internet from Petty Officer 2nd Class W. Kelly,
US Navy Special Warfare Team Six, to D. Hawkins,
Re: Gun Confiscation. Kelly began by stating
that the questionnaire was "...to find out if we
would follow the orders of commanding officers
without question." (Kelly omitted the fact that
the questionnaire assumes "commanding officers"
gives equal authority to UN officers commanding
US forces.) Kelly continued; "If you wish to
find out how I answered I said yes I would fire
and kill all persons attempting to resist...we
aren't around to be the good guys." Remember,
Kelly is referring to American
civilians.In February, 1994, MODERN GUN
magazine ran a story on the elusive
questionnaire which was subsequently circulated
by various patriotic citizens groups. Then, on
10 May, 1994, the questionnaire was administered
to Marine Desert Storm veterans at Twenty-Nine
Palms, CA. A Marine smuggled a copy of the
questionnaire out of the testing center and
mailed it on 15 May, 1994, with a cover letter,
to the editor of THE NEW AMERICAN, which ran the
story in their July 11, 1994, issue. THE NEW
AMERICAN quotes the Marine's impression that the
questionnaire "was just research for this (Navy)
commander's degree." The RESISTER obtained a
copy of the Marine's letter, which actually
states: "A Navy Commander came before us and
said he was working on his masters degree and he
was writing a paper about giving up our
military's sovereignty to the United Nations
Secretary
General."The
official DOD lie surrounding the questionnaire
entitled "Combat Arms Survey," supports that of
the Navy Commander. Significantly, the Combat
Arms Survey was first given at the time
Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 25 was
being prepared. The RESISTER's correspondent in
the Pentagon staff of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
confirms that PDD 25 surrenders control of the
U.S. military to the United Nations.(A
cursory survey of articles written by MACOM
commanders and staff members in official
military journals for the past year reveals a
universal acceptance of U.N. control of the
American military.)The RESISTER has been
eliciting responses to the questionnaire for the
past year. Frighteningly, among service members
with less than 10 years of service, 63% agree or
strongly agree with question # 46: "I would fire
upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist
confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S.
government."Among new recruits almost
90% give the response: "If it's the law and they
order me to do it I guess it's okay." Our
federally controlled public schools have done
their job.Of those with more than 15
years of service, 87% replied "disagree" or
"strongly disagree." Responses by members of the
Special Forces Underground were unprintable;
basically, there will not be many officers who
give that order more than once.
The
RESISTER has enclosed a copy of the Combat Arms
Survey with this issue. As you read it pay
particular attention to the qualifiers and their
relation to recent articles in the official
publications of the Department of Defense, the
civilian media, and the policies of the federal
government. *
[ Editorial Note The
enclosed Combat Arms Survey is a true and
accurate reproduction of the contents of the
questionnaire. We altered the format to
accommodate the The RESISTER's layout. THE
EDITOR ]
<-------------------------------------------------->
COMBAT
ARMS SURVEY
This
questionnaire is to gather data concerning the
attitudes of combat trained personnel with
regards to nontraditional missions. All of your
responses are confidential. Write your answers
directly on the questionnaire form.
In
Part II, place an "X" in the space provided for
your response
.
Part
I. Demographics
1.
What service are you in?
2. What is your pay
grade? (e.g. E-7, O-7)
3. What is your MOS
code and description?
4. What is your highest
level of education in years?
5. How many
months did you serve in Operation Desert
Storm/Desert Shield?
6. How many months did
you serve in Somalia ?
7. What state or
country did you primarily reside in during
childhood?Part II. Attitudes
Do you
feel that U.S. Combat troops should be used
within the United States for any of the
following missions?8. Drug
enforcementStrongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No
opinion ( )9. Disaster relief (e.g.
hurricanes, floods, fires,
earthquakes)Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No
opinion ( )10. Security at national
events (e.g. Olympic Games, Super
Bowl)Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree ( )
Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No opinion ( )
11. Environmental disaster
clean-up
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No opinion ( )
12. Substitute teachers in public
schools
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) No opinion ( )
13. Community assistance programs (e.g.
landscaping, environmental clean-up, road
repair, animal control)
Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion ( )
14. Federal and state
prison guards
Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )
15. National emergency police
force
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree ( )
Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion ( )
16. Advisors to S.W.A.T. units, the FBI
or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
(B.A.T.F.)
Strongly disagree( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )
17. Border patrol (e.g. prevention
of illegal aliens into U.S.
territory)
Strongly disagree( ) Disagree
( ) Agree( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)
Do you feel that U.S. combat troops
under U.S. command should be used in other
countries for and of the following United
Nations missions?
18. Drug
enforcement
Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )
19. Disaster relief (e.g.
hurricanes, floods, fires,
earthquakes)
Strongly disagree( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )
20. Environmental disaster
clean-up
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)
21. Peace keeping
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
22. Nation
building (Reconstruct civil government, develop
public school system, develop or improve public
transportation system, etc.)
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
23.
Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical
supplies, temporary housing, and
clothing)
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )
Do you feel that U.S. combat troops
should be used in other countries, under command
of non-U.S. officers appointed by the United
Nations for any of the following
missions?
24. Drug
enforcement
Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )
25. Disaster relief (e.g.
hurricanes, floods, fires,
earthquakes)
Strongly disagree ( )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )
26. Environmental disaster
clean-up
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)
27. Peace keeping
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
28. Nation
building (Reconstruct civil government, develop
public school system, develop or improve public
transportation system, etc.)
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
29.
Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical
supplies, temporary housing, and
clothing)
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )
30. Police action (e.g. Korea ,
Vietnam , but serving under non-U.S.
officers)
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )
Consider the following
statements:
31. The U.S. runs a field
training exercise. U
N combat troops should be allowed
to serve in U.S. combat units during these
exercises under U.S. command and
control.
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)
32. The United
Nations runs a field training
exercise. U.S. combat troops under U.S. command
and control should serve in U
N combat units during these
exercises.
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )
33. The United
Nations runs a field training
exercise. U.S. combat troops should serve under
U
N command and control in U
N during these
exercises.
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion
( )
34. U.S. combat troops should
participate in U
N missions as long as the U.S. has
full command and control.
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
35. U.S.
combat troops should participate in U
N missions under United
Nations command and
control.
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)
36. U.S. combat troops should be
commanded by U
N officers and non-commissioned
(NCOs) at battalion and company levels while
performing U N
missions.
Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion ( )
37. It would make no
difference to me to have U
N soldiers as members of my team.
(e.g. fire team, squad, platoon)
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
38. It
would make no difference to me to take orders
from a U
N company
commander.
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree
( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)
39. I feel the President of the United
States has the authority to pass his
responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the
U
N Secretary
General.
Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree (
) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion (
)
40. I feel there is no conflict
between my oath of office and serving as a U
N soldier.
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
41. I feel
my unit's combat effectiveness would not be
affected by performing humanitarian missions for
the United
Nations.
Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree (
)
No opinion ( )
42. I feel a
designated unit of U.S. combat soldiers should
be permanently assigned to the command and
control of the United
Nations.
Strongly disagree
( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion ( )
43. I would be
willing to volunteer for assignment to a U.S.
combat unit under a U
N commander.
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )
44. I would
like U
N member countries, including the
U.S. , to the U
N all the soldiers necessary to
maintain world peace.
Strongly disagree (
) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No opinion ( )
45. I would swear to
the following code:
"
I am a
United
Nations fighting person.
I
serve in the forces which maintain
world
peace and every nation's way of life.
I
am prepared to give my life in their
defense."
Strongly
disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly
agree ( )
No opinion ( )QUESTION
#
46
The
U.S. government declares a ban
on
the possession, sale, transportation,
and
transfer of all non-sporting firearms.
A
thirty (30) day amnesty period
is
permitted for these firearms
to
be turned over the local authorities.
At
the end of this period,
a
number of citizen groups refuse
to
turn over their
firearms.
Consider
the following
statement:
I
would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or
resist confiscation of firearms banned by the
U.S.
government.
Strongly
disagree
( X )
Disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( )
No
opinion ( )
End
Note
Our civilian readers may
be wondering
why the Combat
Arms Survey
was circulated so
heavily within the
Department
of the Navy
The reason is simple
the US Navy
is not subject to
USC
Title 10 Posse Comitatus
prohibitions against using
federal military forces
for domestic
law enforcement
This includes the
US
Marine
Corps
Just thought you would like to know
THE
STAFF
[Resistor,
Ed.] |
![[300ResisttheNewWorldOrder.jpg]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sxLGstWiBBYcG2bqzNA6zN_VVsJ9Ex0Ys5NtyhYpldT_YipM3TlnnlFNDfkXlZDCLKsb-3eVskTi1wp_6WyhsdO6Yx6QTrhOlWzD-5Rdn_PfDDcEd2tSOK1asJX53yaIPMh2RdbYajvc93LZmd5kRH0A=s0-d)
It sounds pretty easy until you look at the stratego board.
ReplyDeleteTT - the occupation
* - space
$ - funding
@ -surveillance
6 - chaos (the 80%)
9 - the plan (authority)
3 - wmd (event)
how many plan for their death? few? even fewer plan for incarceration. one in thirty is or was imprisoned in this country. they have increased the prison gulag system in the US several times over since the 911 fraud. this does not include offshore locations for cuba, haiti and dominican..
I don't think it sounds easy but I do think it sounds doable. The odds are there are many others in the machine that feel the same way and are biding their time until the SHTF. Guys that have command of those wmd that they intend to use on the american people. I also think if things get as bad as we suspect, that the majority of those citizens that possess all those weapons they intend to confiscate won't go down without a fight, taking a bunch of the bastards that checked yes on question #46 with them. They better fear for their lives as well. As should the foreign troops, fighting for what exactly?
ReplyDeleteI keep thinking about Smedley Butler and how he led the fascists to believe he was down with their plan until he went and upset the apple cart on the bastards.
While there are still so many brain dead amerikans that still think my country right or wrong, there is a larger, growing number that are pissed off and ready to push back.
If those that rule are truly nothing more than sick psychopaths, they shouldn't be that hard to fool because they think they've gotten everything under their control and wrapped up in their favor.
Maybe they're wrong. Maybe they don't. Their hubris may be their undoing.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/obamas-dhs-seizing-local-power/
ReplyDeletePuddy, check starsandstripes4....
WHOA WHOA WHOA just a minute ! This questionaire was part of someones doctoral thesis and was not a DOD generated doc. Of course I have been wrong before,and smokescreens have been used before. This questionaire is not used other than the time in Cali. as far as I know from scuttlebutt. As I have stated I have been wrong before. Talk to some fresh recruits or recently discharged to get the real story.
ReplyDelete"The last roundup" tee hee, thats a good way of putting it. Sheep can be rounded up, but wolverines ????
ReplyDeleteIf so, do you remember when a doctoral thesis or any other research venture at a university did not get into the MIC system?
ReplyDeleteRhodes to the Pentagon. I certainly will concede the origination point as somewhere other than the DoD. Who needs the PR of DoD letterhead?
What generates from Reuters and CNN may be right from NSA-Langley but the truth is never revealed.
The Real ID venture is about predictive measures. It's all data-mining now and targeted
ReplyDelete.gov/gangstalking/(enter your name here)
No Snowblowers needed!
One of the VIPR purposes lays out the need for [Enhance] agency resources during "special events" which like a superbowl or a staged event in Boston no longer has a delineation. We should understand they are all staged events even down to the wars since Gulf War I.
ReplyDeleteThe visual PRESENCE of the Vipr is the most important aspect of the program, IMO. Where the reality is in the program is that it offers the ancillary authorities for use outside of the staging area. The insiders of DHS/TSA are the stagers, directors and assistants to the producers of reality Amerika.
We've seen the EO laundry list from Ronnie to Barry. Piece by piece and line by line like a massive script for an epic conclusion. The devils in the details = true.
The sheep are forced labor, the wolverines may be re-educated to watch over the shearing of the flocks or inducted into the blue helmets. If not they would likely be dismissed and terminated. (Logic?)
ReplyDelete