HOWEVER HE STILL STOPS SHORT BY SAYING, MORE THAN ONCE, THAT HE BELIEVES THE KIDS DIED. HOW DOES HE KNOW? MAYBE THEY DID BUT WHAT PROOF IS HE GOING ON? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE DIED? WE ONLY HAVE THE WORD OF A FEW AUTHORITIES ON SCENE AND THE MSM THAT SHOOTINGS ACTUALLY HAPPENED. PARENTS AND SPOUSE'S ALIKE WERE NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO VIEW THE BODIES OF THEIR ALLEGEDLY DECEASED RELATIVES. PERHAPS ALEX HAS PROOF. AFTER ALL, HE WAITED TO STUDY THIS EVENT BEFORE REALLY COMMENTING FULLY ON IT. I WISH HE'S OFFER UP HIS OPINION ON HOW HE KNOWS FOR A FACT CHILDLREN DIED BECAUSE I JUST DON'T KNOW.
REGARDLESS, AJ HAS PUT TOGETHER A GOOD VIDEO ON HOW A FALSE FLAG IS PRODUCED AND FOISTED UPON THE GULLIBLE PUBLIC.
http://youtu.be/tM5ZdO-IgEE
AGAIN, WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT CHILDREN DIED? WHAT? NO AMBULANCES?
http://youtu.be/ucXGMHPGx-4
DID ADAM LANZA EVEN EXIST?
http://youtu.be/A-9i20HESX8
http://youtu.be/B5vTsNxSmEs
AND THE DISINFO SPREAD ABOUT ADAM BEING VIOLENT>>> THIS IS HOW THEY DO IT. "I AM ADAM LANZA'S MOTHER" >>A SO CALLED MOTHER OF A VIOLENT SON WAS RELATING HIM WITH ADAM
http://youtu.be/Dgrr2jDcXAs
WHY IS THIS FF SO OBVIOUS IN IT'S DECEPTION? HERE IS ONE WRITER'S OPINION: MILES W MATHIS... I CAN'T SAY I DISAGREE WITH HIM. ~jg
"These debunking articles and shows are just making the conspiracy snowball, and I have to think they
intend that. We have heard that nothing happens by accident, and I still believe that.
Perhaps the most curious thing of all is that I see deeply buried signs of hope here. Someone
somewhere is feeding the conspiracy theorists easy information, so the gun ban agenda isn't the only
agenda moving forward. One faction is using the tragedy for that, as they always do. It has never
worked and it isn't working now. But another faction is using the tragedy to undermine itself, and we
should continue to study the signs to see what faction that is, and what end they have in mind. It may
possibly be some improvement over the current state of things. I have said before that we seem to have
the military cartel warring against the banking cartel, and the banks appear to be losing. But the
military is also split, and we can't yet see who will come out on top. The sign of hope is that with all
these warring factions among the elite, they don't have the time or the resources to fire up the
concentration camps or start a war against the people. They have their hands full with China, Russia,
and the fallout from their own factional battles. Right now, everything is falling apart. Everyone in
power seems to be losing and no one seems to be winning. We see power splintering, which is always
a sign of hope in any country trying to salvage freedom. I begin to doubt that all the ammunition
purchases have been made to use against the citizenry. It is more likely that we will see the
government fighting itself, with the DHS having to fight for its survival against the army/national
guard, or something like that. We may see a civil war that the rank and file take little or no part in."
HIS ENTIRE ARTICLE ON DEBUNKING A DEBUNKER CAN BE FOUND HERE : http://mileswmathis.com/sh3.pdf WITH THANKS TO OZ FOR THE HEADS UP:)
personally I think he says they died because he HAS to.he is clearly walking both sides of the fence...
ReplyDeleteI agree Dawn ;)
ReplyDeleteYup. He's making sure he has his bases covered.
ReplyDeleteAnyone see this? It's new to me! I'd seen a lot of replays of the gurney going by (from the back) but here's a good shot of the woman on the gurney. I wonder who she is? The reporter says it's "one of the wounded being taken away," but of course, she's put in an ambulance that goes nowhere.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwqA6HKxLTs
What language is that at the end?
ReplyDeleteSounds Ukrainian or Russian - something along those lines. Of course, you have to go all the way to the other side of the globe to get video like that!
ReplyDeleteHi all, my first post here :) I've enjoyed reading the posts here.
ReplyDeleteI had to laugh watching the above vid. Did they push the woman in the stretcher all the way up the road from SH elementary to the fire house? lol
First time I seen a paramedic wearing a beanie too. lol
I agree. I posted another where they were talking Russian.
ReplyDeleteThe emp assault at the Superdome was something. It took down the grid which delayed the game for nearly 40 minutes. That was psyops folks. A warning it was as well.
Along with the usual pro military slant, aspartame commercials and Beyonce/Jesuit Z choreography, the EMP warning was surely the hilight of the event.
Being in The Big Easy was not by chance either. It has become the beta testing venue for all things HAARP. I suspect again we will see a larger event and another warning that the NAU is coming. We have the new coins and the superhighway under way.
I have to believe the financial event comes first. Along with a rising unemployment rate and hiked gas /food prices we will get a market anomaly and feared run on banks.
This WAS OUR WARNING. Please do not take it with a grain of a salt. It was real.
oh yeah I believe the children were taken, never let a good opportunity go to waste right? Get it? Sneaky fuks. Def why AJ says he thinks the kids are dead, divide the "critical thinkers' and conquer.
ReplyDeleteOne other piece of info about SH I thought i'd share as I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere. The aurora shooting & SH were both on black moons.
ReplyDeleteI remember waking up on the 15th dec ( in AUS) turning on the computer & thinking to myself 'man i gotta a bad feeling something went down yesterday/today in the USA' Bam.. i see the SH shooting. Kinda freaked me out.
Puddy, if it was an EMP event at "the super event", at 13:22 on the clock as a commenter at infowars stated, would there not be collateral outages reported? Cell phones, residential outages, am/fm radio foul-ups, etc. What gives you the impression it was an EMP assault? This is the first I've heard of this theory... not that that means anything.
ReplyDeleteI had seen the video before but from further away rkae and without the russian commentary. Someone here had posted it, I think. I've also seen a picture of someone being wheeled down the lane to the firehouse on a stretcher by an emt. Really? That's another real wtf moment.
ReplyDeleteYea, jay ..if I'm correct in this, that's when they perform their satanic rituals, not under a full moon as some might believe...
ReplyDeleteNot a directed vector laser. A large scale scalar type would. Well have to see if it was a weapons test or just a staged version of the real thing.
ReplyDeleteie: Aurora Sandy Hook, where and when do we get the real one? If ever?
If you do an exercise. You mock up certain components. Like 911 where you fake the commercial airliners, you use other quasi drone projectiles or missile defense technology. Holographic technology, etc. Then you use electromagnetic scalar or focused energy weapons and test them during the chaos.
In the case of XLVII = 47 =11 we will be fooled in the true nature of the test and all the data and information they were after.
2013 = 6 and the event happened in the third quarter and 33 minutes
There are the factors in a 9-11 event. It's never what it is explained by the MSM, but it's never certain that several CT's are plausable. It also does not matter whether it's mock or beta test, but the fact that both are used in every event.
I gotta say that you misframe Rappoport every time you mention him JG.
ReplyDeleteIt's like you have a biased reading disorder.
No one KNOWS whether the children died or were kidnapped. Nothing empirical here, only supposition. Rappoport has not put any suppositions in stone, he has pretty much put forth other's suppositions without judging, just saying, here is what they are.
Rappoprt has spoken rationally from several of the common suppositions, making strong cases for each. The incongruity in these position are not his, they are the reader's which don't understand this impartial mode of analysis.
They follow the best line of reasoning they can for a defined supposition.
Always the unknowns are admitted to in each analysis as well.
At any rate, I see this is something you don't grasp about Rappoport.
\\][//
my thoughts exactly.
ReplyDelete** What is called Satanism is the ruling hierarchy of the Brotherhood under the command of the Reptilians. * D a w n a t i l l a ' s G r a f X * http://dawnatilla.deviantart.com/ 4 1 5 5 5 0 0 6 3 8
**Dawnatilla *The *Hun* is on: *DeviantArt*, *FaceBook*, *YouTube*, *Tumblr*, at the infamous *WordPress* blog: *COTO*:* Coalition of the Obvious.*
Will, yea you are right. I am biased against Rappoport. I think I explained why before. I won't go into it again except to say that he, along with others, were pushing the lone gunman on SSRIs from the moment the story broke even with all the inconsistencies from day one that pointed to more than one shooter.
ReplyDeleteSo yea, I lost a lot of respect for the man because it seemed as if he was pushing his own anti drug agenda instead of sorting through all the contradictory information being put out. THat's not what real investigative reporters with his cred are supposed to do. Recently, he's been off that soapbox because it's too hard to push that lone gunman theory now in the alternative community.
Let me take this time to say that I too amstrongly against the use of SSRIs especially amongst children same as Rappoport. But my instinct and the information we were being fed did not point to a crazed nut on drugs. I find it hard to believe that he didn't see that as most who studied the "incident" did.
While I have a bias against him, you seem to be a bit too enthralled by whatever he says. Two ends of the spectrum being exhibited :)
o
No I don't have a bias in favor of him. As I said above, and I too won't go into it again.
ReplyDeleteYou also do the same thing here with Jones:
"HOWEVER HE STILL STOPS SHORT BY SAYING, MORE THAN ONCE, THAT HE BELIEVES THE KIDS DIED. HOW DOES HE KNOW? MAYBE THEY DID BUT WHAT PROOF IS HE GOING ON?"
Jones clearly states that he doesn't KNOW. He says it is his intuition, 'gut feeling' - but stresses he doesn't know.
Then YOU say: "MAYBE THEY DID.." So YOU admit you don't KNOW. But your intuition, your gut feelings say that no children were killed. What is the difference in those positions logically?
There is NO difference but in what your opposing gut instincts tell you.
I don't KNOW one way or the other either. But MY gut instinct tells me that children were murdered.
I don't think Adam Lanza killed anybody. And that is backed up by lack of evidence that he did, plus the mitigating evidence of up to three other suspects. There is something substantial there to hold on to.
But the fact that anybody was actually killed is unproven, but also the fact that nobody was killed is equally unproven.
I don't know why this argument has to take place. The logic of the situation is clear.
\\][//
From a recent conversation at the other blog:
ReplyDelete. . . . . . . . .
>"I think what’s needed is to put into practice and follow our Constitution."Hufferd
That may sound consoling to the casual reader Hufferd, but it doesn't satisfy me. I have had a taste of how you interpret things here. If we are to rely on your "more ideographic", or "Ideological Interpretations," we are no longer dealing with the text of the Constitution, we are dealing with a non-congruent template of 'Intent', built on the assumptions of your own intent.
This is totally obvious in your interpretation of Jefferson that began our discussion. You view this as "well he must obviously meant this because it is the best idea" - regardless of the context of Jefferson's own principles, which is the only proper context to read him in.
And his text, like all text must be read for what the words actually say, and follow his reasoning without tampering with it ideologically. What the man is saying is diametrically opposed to the the context that you place his words in.
So what I read from your subtext is that your would read the Constitution from a socialist perspective. I know this perspective well Hufferd. That is what I see in you.
The nail on the head here is your stand against the Constitution itself in speaking against the 2nd Amendment. Its meaning is clear by historical and textual fact. It is unlawful to legislate in ultra vires of the Constitution, gun control is unlawful in the US by the Supreme Law of the land.
Only Kafkaesque interpretations of the amendment can pretend that any gun controls whatsoever are unlawful. The only way this could happen was drip by drip, for "practical" reasons. It matters not how "practical" an act is if that act is beyond the authority that makes that act. "Practical" has a very limited and short sighted perspective according to some.
From a larger holistic perspective, the balance of virtue is best served by a long term view of acts in progression that are not lawful but temporarily "practical". And this long term view is in history. And history shows vividly what attention to the temporary short term practicality regardless of law inevitably leads to ruin and despotism over the the masses.
\\][//
The logic u speak of is yours. If u don't want to argue over it stop bringing it up. You admire him. I don't. End of story:)
ReplyDeleteWhether children died or not they are guilty of killing the spirit. I'm tired of the operant conditioning by these miscreant swine. The children, they believe are us. I'm sick of the game and their stinking rules.
ReplyDeleteI fully support the 'no death' scenario and in the Schrödinger model they are both dead and alive but for the sake of the scum feeding media, I work in this model. We saw no corpses therefore no one is dead. Fuck them all.
As to the SSRI's, I have targeted this in posts for years as the psychotropic cocktail with a emr twist as the ills of society. Rappaport is a bona fide researcher and reporter who has a method I can respect. He focuses on issues dear to my heart and has for years. I have a bias as far as he goes. But I expect him to move to the physical reality of Sandy Hook, Aurora and 911 if he expects to do more than earn a living as a consummate investigator.
Can't disagree with anything u just said including the last line about Rappoport.. Those kids were taken, not shot is my theory. However they would be better off dead which truly sickens my spirit.
ReplyDeleteMr Cati states that three children were sacrificed...but how does he know this?
ReplyDeleteGood question dawn, does he offer any explanation of how he knows this? Is he surmising this from some information he has put together?
ReplyDeleteBtw listening to Rappoport now on rense archives. He's talking about how the msm cons the sheeple with their wiley learned ways and "stage craft"... yawn... once again Jon, tell the awakened something we DON'T know please? Will let you know if he reveals somethig coto doesn't already know. I like his voice because it sounds like Michael DiBari but Dibari has energy in his voice, this guy talks so slow it's putting me to sleep... hypnotic even.. whoaaaaaa..
ReplyDeleteThis is info for the uniformed. You can listen here if interested>
http://mediaarchives.gsradio.net/mike_harris/hr1020113.mp3
HAHA I dont share your view of him, (though Im sure the show is pedantic) ...but I do share and appreciate the No-Doubts-About-It precision appraisals of who we deem worthy... Personally I think Jon has a way of explaining and describing things that is very helpful to many with an often keen or alternate way of looking at something. Admittedly, I only began to read his stuff at the same time I got here...via SandyHook. Its quite probable your instincts are picking something up though.. **
ReplyDelete**Dawnatilla *The *Hun* is on: *DeviantArt*, *FaceBook*, *YouTube*, *Tumblr*, at the infamous *WordPress* blog: *COTO*:* Coalition of the Obvious.*
* D a w n a t i l l a ' s G r a f X * http://dawnatilla.deviantart.com/ 4 1 5 5 5 0 0 6 3 8
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:53 AM, COALITION OF THE OBVIOUS wrote:
> ** > jerseyg commented: "Btw listening to Rappoport now on rense archives. > He's talking about how the msm cons the sheeple with their wiley learned > ways and "stage craft"... yawn... once again Jon, tell the awakened > something we DON'T know please? Will let you know if he reveal" >
no..just stating as such and pointing it out where it HAPPENED! should I post the video or link?
ReplyDelete** What is called Satanism is the ruling hierarchy of the Brotherhood under the command of the Reptilians. * D a w n a t i l l a ' s G r a f X * http://dawnatilla.deviantart.com/ 4 1 5 5 5 0 0 6 3 8
**Dawnatilla *The *Hun* is on: *DeviantArt*, *FaceBook*, *YouTube*, *Tumblr*, at the infamous *WordPress* blog: *COTO*:* Coalition of the Obvious.*
check this out Jg! http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=53923
ReplyDeletethe only good part of that link is the map and name of person who owns this property apparently. where mr Cati says the children (three) were sacrificed.
ReplyDeleteThanks dawn, I just went to the link and bookmarked it. I have to get ready for work and will read at break.
ReplyDeleteIt appears I'm the only one thoroughly annoyed with Rappoport , who btw, I used to admire greatly and still appreciate his exposing Big Pharma and their nasty drugs and vaccines. Just can't get past his harping on a lone gunman on ssri's at SH early on in the story. He has gone the way of Chomsky in my mind..sadly.
Logic actually has certain sound classical perimeters.
ReplyDeleteGut feelings are descriptions of the flavor and taste of your burp.
End of story.
\\][//
Logic? Really? How about evidence? Logic tells me there has to be evidence. I see none. Ergo... no kids died Fini!
ReplyDeleteYes logic.
ReplyDeleteLogic based on zero evidence cannot determine one way or the other.
Ergo...kids died/no kids died - Fini
\\][//
"in the Schrödinger model they are both dead and alive"~Puddy
ReplyDeleteAnd one doesn't know which until the box is opened.
The Sandy Hook box remains closed.
Thus: they are both dead and alive.
Any other determination is pure assumption.
\\][//
Whatever Will. This is where pure instinct comes in. The best investigative journalists and detectives have very good instincts and solve cases on following their hunches when they have nothing else to go on. That's a fact. Dispute it if you must but the truth is, you either have it or you don't.
ReplyDeleteI wish I could go to Sandy Hook and find those parents and talk to Rosen and find that god damn bus driver that dropped kids off on his front lawn! I really really do.
Does Rappaport believe Emily Parker died? ( Soz haven't read alot of his stuff)
ReplyDeleteI hadn't seen this footage of R.Parker before, probably cauz I can't stand looking at the bullshitard freak.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ptRChemGCY
" The person that chose to act in this way was acting with a god given right that he was given by god -to- with his own free agency. "
ReplyDeleteOH Nice one!! :O
I did see that before jay. That's when I knew, even without the horrible acting, that this guy was a fraud. Wtf does a wealthy family need a donation page for ?? Especially one put up the very day his daughter "dies" by two of his "friends". REALLY? Yea, this is where those spidey senses are invaluable and the bs! meter goes crazy.
ReplyDeleteThat whole alleged conversation he had with his daughter sounds as fishy as hell too.
As for Rappoport, if he's such a crack investigative journalist with all these years of experience, wonder why he doesn't go to Sandy Hook and do some real investigating and get some answers for himself? Does he believe Emilie is dead? Who the hell knows. He's been too busy pontificating about how the msm brainwashes everyone. No shit Sherlock. Get the hell out in the field and find us some answers if you're better than they are or shut the hell up about them.
ReplyDeletehehe, thx for your comment jg.
ReplyDeleteI'm abit obsessed w- SH atm because of the sheer obviousness, but I have to admit I haven't looked at heaps of footage of the families etc , makes me angry.
This is a good montage, heaps of pic's of the sextons (phelps), Vicki Soto's bro, hanging out with the sexton daughters.. OH Man! !! One big happy satanic cluster F***!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3DR6zTVVFY&bpctr=1360209747