Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Charlie Sheen's 20 Minutes with the President (on 9/11)

charlie sheen

I recently had the pleasure of sitting down with our 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, while he was out promoting his health care reform initiative. I requested 30 minutes given the scope and detail of my inquiry; they said I could have 20. Twenty minutes, 1200 seconds, not a lot of time to question the President about one of the most important events in our nation’s history. The following is a transcript of our remarkable discussion.

————————————————————————————————————————



Charlie Sheen – Good afternoon Mr. President, thank you so much for taking time out of your demanding schedule.

President Barack Obama – My pleasure, the content of your request seemed like something I should carve out a few minutes for.

CS – I should point out that I voted for you, as your promises of hope and change, transparency and accountability, as well as putting government back into the hands of the American people, struck an emotional chord in me that I hadn’t felt in quite some time, perhaps ever.

PBO – And I appreciate that Charlie. Big fan of the show, by the way.

CS – Sir, I can’t imagine when you might find the time to actually watch my show given the measure of what you inherited.

PBO – I have it Tivo’d on Air Force One. Nice break from the traveling press corps. (He glances at his watch) not to be abrupt or to rush you, but you have 19 minutes left.

CS – I’ll take that as an invitation to cut to the chase.

PBO – I’m all ears. Or so I’ve been told.

CS – Sir, in the very near future we will be experiencing our first 9/11 anniversary with you as Commander in Chief.

PBO – Yes. A very solemn day for our Nation. A day of reflection and yet a day of historical consciousness as well.

CS – Very much so sir, very much so indeed…. Now; In researching your position regarding the events of 9/11 and the subsequent investigation that followed, am I correct to understand that you fully support and endorse the findings of the commission report otherwise known as the ‘official story’?

PBO – Do I have any reason not to? Given that most of us are presumably in touch with similar evidence.

CS – I really wish that were the case, sir. Are you aware, Mr. President, of the recent stunning revelations that sixty percent of the 9/11 commissioners have publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack?

PBO – I am aware of certain “in fighting” during the course of their very thorough and tireless investigative process.

CS – Mr. President, it’s hard to label this type of friction as “in fighting” or make the irresponsible leap to “thorough,” when the evidence I insist you examine regarding 6 of the 10 members are statements of fact.

(At this point one of Obama’s senior aides approaches the President and whispers into his ear. Obama glances quickly at his watch and nods as the aide resumes his post at the doorway, directly behind me.)

PBO – No disrespect Mr. Sheen, but I have to ask; what is it that you seem to be implying with the initial direction of this discussion?

CS – I am not implying anything Mr. President. I am here to present the facts and see what you plan to do with them.

PBO – Let me guess; your ‘facts,’ allegedly supporting these claims are in the folders you brought with you?

CS – Good guess Mr. President.

(I hand the first folder of documents to the President)

CS – Again sir, these are not my opinions or assumptions, this is all a matter of public record, reported through mainstream media, painstakingly fact checked and verified.

(the President glances into the folder I handed him)

CS – You’ll notice sir on page one of the dossier dated August of ‘06 from the Washington Post, the statements of John Farmer, senior council to the 9/11 commission, his quote stating, “I was shocked how different the truth was from the way it was described.”

PBO – (as he glances down at the report, almost inaudible) …. um hmm….

CS – He goes on to further state “The [NORAD Air Defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years….”

(the President continues to view the documents)

CS – On pages two and three, sir, are the statements, as well, from commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, commissioners Bob Kerrey, Timothy Roemer and John Lehman, as well as the statements of commissioner Max Cleland, an ex-Senator from Georgia , who resigned, stating:



“It is a national scandal. This investigation is now compromised. One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”

He also described President Bush’s desire to delay the process as not to damage the ‘04 re-election bid. They suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. Mr. President, this information alone is unequivocally grounds for a new investigation!

PBO – Mistakes were clearly made but we as a people and as a country need to move forward. It is obviously in our best interest as a democratic society to focus our efforts and our resources on the future of this great nation and our ability to protect the American people and our allies from this type of terrorism in the coming years.

CS – Sir, how can we focus on the future when THE COMMISSION ITSELF is on record stating that they still do not know the truth??

PBO – Even if what you state, might in some capacity, begin to approach an open discussion or balanced debate, I can’t speak for, or about the decisions certain commission members made during an extremely difficult period. Perhaps you should be interviewing them instead of me. Wait, don’t tell me; I was easier to track down than they were?

CS – Not exactly sir, but let’s be honest. You’re the President of the United States, the leader of the free world, the buck stops with you. 9/11 has been the pretext for the systematic dismantling of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Your administration is reading from the same playbook that the Bush administration foisted on America through documented secrecy and deception.

PBO – Mr. Sheen, I’m having a difficult time sitting here and listening to you draw distorted parallels between the Bush/Cheney regime and mine.

CS – Mr. President the parallels are not distorted just because you say they are. Let’s stick to the facts. You promised to abolish the Patriot Act and then voted to re-authorize it. You pledged to end warrantless wire tapping against the American people and now energetically defend it. You decried the practice of rendition and now continue it. You promised over and over again on the campaign trail, that you would end the practice of indefinite detention and instead, you have expanded it to permanent detention of “detainees” without trial. This far exceeds the outrages of the former administration. Call me crazy Mr. President, but is this not your record?

PBO – Mr. Sheen, my staff and I authorized this interview based on your request to discuss 9/11 and deliver some additional information you’re convinced I’d not previously reviewed. Call me crazy, But it appears as though you’ve blindly wandered off topic.

CS – Sir, the examples I just illustrated are a direct result of 9/11.

PBO – And I’m telling you that we must move forward, we must endure through these dangerous and politically challenging years ahead.

CS – Mr. President, we cannot move forward with a bottomless warren of unanswered questions surrounding that day and its aftermath.

PBO – I read the official report. Every word every page. Perhaps you should do the same.

CS – I have sir, and so have thousands of family members of the victims, and guess what; they have the same questions I do and probably a lot more. I didn’t lose a loved one on that horrific day Mr. President and neither did you. But since then I, along with millions of other Americans lost something we held true and dear for most of our lives in this great country of ours; we lost our hope.

PBO – And I’d like to believe that I am here to restore that hope. To restore confidence in your leaders, in the system that the voting public chose through a peaceful transfer of power.

(An odd moment of silence between us. Precious time ticking away).

CS – Mr. President, are you aware of the number of days it took to begin the investigation into JFK’s assassination?

PBO – If memory serves I believe it was two weeks.

CS – Close. Seventeen days to be exact. Are you aware sir, how long it took to begin the investigation into Pearl Harbor?

PBO – I would say again about….two weeks.

CS – Close again sir, eleven days to be exact. Are you aware Mr. President how long it took to begin the investigation into 9/11?

PBO – I know it must have seemed like a very long time for all the grieving families.

CS – It was a very long time Mr. President – four hundred and forty days. Roughly 14 months. Does it bother you Mr. President that it only took FIVE HOURS for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after the initial attack to recommend and endorse a full scale offensive against Iraq?

PBO – I am not aware of any such purported claim.

CS – I have the proof Mr. President, along with scores of documents and facts I’d like you to take a look at. Here.

(I hand him another file – much thicker than the first)

PBO – I see you came prepared Charlie.

CS – No other way to show up Mr. President. When in doubt over prepare I always say.

PBO – Now you sound like the First Lady.

CS – That’s quite a compliment sir.

PBO – As you wish. Please continue.

CS – Sir, I’d like to direct your attention to the stack of documents in the folder I just handed you. The first in from the top is entitled “ Operation Northwoods“, a declassified Pentagon plan to stage terror attacks on US soil, to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext for war.

PBO – And I’d like to direct your attention to the fact that the principle draftsman of this improbable blueprint was quickly denied a second term as Joint Chiefs chairman and sent packing to a European NATO garrison. Thank God his otherworldly ambitions never saw the light of day.

CS – I wouldn’t be so certain about that Mr. President.

PBO – I could easily say the same to you Charlie.

(the President checks his watch)






















featured stories   Twenty Minutes with the President
soylent greenfeatured stories   Twenty Minutes with the President
Charlie Sheen writing 20 Minutes with the President. Photo by Alex Jones.

CS – The next document reads “Declassified staged provocations.” Now, Honestly Mr. President I wish I was making this stuff up. I’m certain you are familiar with the USS Maine Incident, the sinking of the Lusitania, which we all now know brought us into WW1, and of course the most famous, the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

PBO – Of course I am familiar with these historical events and I’m aware that there’s a measure of controversy surrounding them. But to be quite frank with you, this is all ancient history.

CS – Mr. President, it has been often said; “Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” And I concede to you sir, these events are the past.

PBO – A vastly different world young man, shouldering a radically disparate state of universal affairs.

CS – No argument sir, I’m merely inviting you to acknowledge some credibility to the pattern or the theme. Case in point; the next document in your folder. It was published by the think-tank, Project For a New American Century and it’s entitled “ Rebuilding Americas Defenses“, and was written by Dick Cheney and Jeb Bush. To quote from the document sir – (the President interrupts)

PBO – “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

CS – Touche, sir. Your thoughts on this statement Mr. President?

PBO – I would call this a blatant case of misjudgment fueled by an unfortunate milieu of assumption. For some, the uninformed denial of coincidence.

CS – Interesting angle sir. Nevertheless, Vice President Cheney didn’t stop there. In early 2008, Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh and MSNBC, both reported that Cheney had proposed to the Pentagon an outrageous plan to have the U.S. Navy create fake Iranian patrol boats, to be manned by Navy Seals, who would then stage an attack on US destroyers in the Strait of Hormuz. This event was to be blamed on Iran and used as a pretext for war. Does any of this information worry you Mr. President? Should we just ignore it, until these realities can be dismissed years from now by our children, as ancient history as well?

PBO – Of course this information worries me, yet it’s not nearly as worrisome as you sitting here today suspiciously implying that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside.

CS – Mr. President I am not suspiciously implying anything. I am merely exposing the documents and asking the questions that nobody in power will even look at or acknowledge. And as I stated earlier, I voted for you, I believed in your message of hope and change. Mr. President I have come to you specifically hoping for a change. A change in the perception that our government has not yet made itself open and accountable to the people. These are your words Mr. President not mine. The lives of thousands were brutally cut short and those left behind to suffer their infinite pain are with me today Mr. President. They are with me in spirit and flesh, and the message we carry will not be silenced anymore by media fueled mantras insisting how they are supposed to feel. Deciding for them, for 8 long years, what can be thought, what can be said, what can be asked.

PBO – And I appreciate your passion, I appreciate your conviction. In spite of your concerns, in spite of what your data might or might not reveal, what you and the families must understand and accept is that we are doing everything we can to protect you.

CS – Mr. President , I realize were very short on time, so please allow me to run down a list of bullet points that might illuminate some reasons why we don’t embrace the warm hug of Federal protection.

PBO – We’ve come this far. Fire away.

CS – Please keep in mind Mr. President everything I’m about to say is documented as fact and part of the public record. The information you are holding in your hands chronicles and verifies each and every point.

PBO – You have five minutes left. The floor is yours. Brief me.

CS – Thank you Mr. President. Okay, first; On the FBI’s most wanted list Osama Bin Laden is not charged with the crimes of 911. When I called the FBI to ask them why this was the case, they replied: “There’s not enough evidence to link Bin Laden to the crime scene,” I later discovered he had never even been indicted by the D.O.J.

CSNumber 2; FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, was dismissed and gagged by the D.O.J. after she revealed that the government had foreknowledge of plans to attack American cities using planes as bombs as early as April 2001. In July of ‘09, Mrs. Edmonds broke the Federal gag order and went public to reveal that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all working for and with the C.I.A. up until the day of 9/11.

CSNumber 3; The following is a quote from Mayor Giuliani during an interview on 9/11 with Peter Jennings for ABC News. “I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”

WHO TOLD HIM THIS??? To this day, the answer to this question remains unanswered, completely ignored and emphatically DENIED by Mayor Giuliani on several public occasions.

CSNumber 4; In April 2004, USA Today reported, “In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.” One of the targets was the World Trade Center.

CSNumber 5; On September 12th 2007, CNN’s ‘Anderson Cooper 360′, reported that the mysterious “white plane” spotted and videotaped by multiple media outlets, flying in restricted airspace over the White House shortly before 10am on the morning of 9/11, was in fact the Air Force’s E-4B, a specially modified Boeing 747 with a communications pod behind the cockpit; otherwise known as “The Doomsday Plane”.

Though fully aware of the event, the 9/11 Commission did not deem the appearance of the military plane to be of any interest and did not include it in the final 9/11 Commission report.

CSNumber 6; Three F-16s assigned to Andrews Air Force Base, ten miles from Washington, DC, are conducting training exercises in North Carolina 207 miles away as the first plane crashes into the WTC. Even at significantly less than their top speed of 1500 mph, they could still have defended the skies over Washington well before 9am, more than 37 minutes before Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon, however, they did not return until after 9:55am.

Andrews AFB had no armed fighters on alert and ready to take off on the morning of 9/11.

CSNumber 7; WTC Building 7. Watch the video of its collapse.

CSNumber 8; Flight 93 is fourth plane to crash on 9/11 at 10:03am. V.P. Cheney only gives shoot down order at 10:10-10:20am and this is not communicated to NORAD until 28 minutes after Flight 93 has crashed.

Fueling further suspicion on this front is the fact that three months before the attacks of 9/11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else on planet Earth, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9/11. He did not exercise that power. Three months after 9/11, he relinquished command of NORAD and returned it to military operation.

    CSNumber 9; Scores of main stream news outlets reported that the F.B.I. conducted an investigation of at least FIVE of the 9/11 hijackers being trained at U.S. military flight schools. Those investigations are now sealed and need to be declassified.

    CSNumber 10; In 2004, New York firefighters Mike Bellone and Nicholas DeMasi went public to say they had found the black boxes at the World Trade Center, but were told to keep their mouths shut by FBI agents. Nicholas DeMasi said that he escorted federal agents on an all-terrain vehicle in October 2001 and helped them locate the devices, a story backed up by rescue volunteer Mike Bellone.

    As the Philadelphia Daily News reported at the time, “Their story raises the question of whether there was a some type of cover-up at Ground Zero.”

    CSNumber 11 – Hundreds of eye witnesses including first responders, fire captains, news reporters, and police, all described multiple explosions in both towers before and during the collapse.

    CSNumber 12; An astounding video uncovered from the archives shows BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Tapes from earlier BBC broadcasts show news anchors discussing the collapse of WTC 7 a full 26 minutes in advance. The BBC at first claimed that their tapes from 9/11 had been “lost” before admitting that they made the “error” of reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened without adequately explaining how they could have obtained advance knowledge of the event.

    In addition, over an hour before the collapse of WTC 7, at 4:10pm, CNN’s Aaron Brown reported that the building “has either collapsed, or is collapsing.”

    CSNumber 13; Solicitor General Ted Olson’s claim that his wife Barbara Olsen called him twice from Flight 77, describing hijackers with box cutters, was a central plank of the official 9/11 story.

    However, the credibility of the story was completely undermined after Olsen kept changing his story about whether his wife used her cell phone or the airplane phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. American Airlines confirmed that Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and that this plane did not have airplane phones on board.

    According to the FBI, Barbara Olsen attempted to call her husband only once and the call failed to connect, therefore Olsen must have been lying when he claimed he had spoken to his wife from Flight 77.

    CSNumber 14; The size of a Boeing 757 is approximately 125ft in width and yet images of the impact zone at the Pentagon supposedly caused by the crash merely show a hole no more than 16ft in diameter. The engines of the 757 would have punctured a hole bigger than this, never mind the whole plane. Images before the partial collapse of the impact zone show little real impact damage and a sparse debris field completely inconsistent with the crash of a large jetliner, especially when contrasted with other images showing airplane crashes into buildings.

    CSNumber 15; What is the meaning behind the following quote attributed to Dick Cheney which came to light during the 9/11 Commission hearings? The passage is taken from testimony given by then Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta.

    During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”

    As the plane was not shot down, in addition to the fact that armed fighter jets were nowhere near the plane and the Pentagon defensive system was not activated, are we to take it that the orders were to let the plane find its target?

    CSNumber 16; In May 2003, the Miami Herald reported how the Bush administration was refusing to release a 900-page congressional report on 9/11 because it wanted to “avoid enshrining embarrassing details in the report,” particularly regarding pre-9/11 warnings as well as the fact that the hijackers were trained at U.S. flight schools.

    CSNumber 17; Top Pentagon officials cancelled their scheduled flights for September 11th on September 10th. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, following a security warning, cancelled a flight into New York that was scheduled for the morning of 9/11.

    CSNumber 18; The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004, and even by that point it was only in the trial phase. Calls from cell phones which formed an integral part of the official government version of events were technologically impossible at the time.

    CSNumber 19: On April 29, 2004, President Bush and V.P. Cheney would only meet with the commission under specific clandestine conditions. They insisted on testifying together and not under oath. They also demanded that their testimony be treated as a matter of “state secret.” To date, nothing they spoke of that day exists in the public domain.

    CS – And finally Mr. President – Number 20; A few days after the attack, several newspapers as well as the FBI reported that a paper passport had been found in the ruins of the WTC. In August 2004, CNN reported that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah’s visa was found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

    At least a third of the WTC victim’s bodies were vaporized and many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify the perpetrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted steel buildings.

    (The Senior aide appears again beside the President whispering in his ear. He then quickly moves off).

    PBO – Well Charlie I can’t say this hasn’t been interesting. As I said earlier you’ve showed up today focused and organized. Regardless how I feel about the material you’ve presented, I must commend your dedication and zeal. However, our time here is up.

    (the President rises from his chair , I do the same).

    CS – Mr. President! One more second!

    (The President starts towards the door – I follow him quickly step for step).

    CS – Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -

    (He pauses. We shake hands).

    CS – Make sure you’re on the right side of history.

    (The President breaks the handshake).

    PBO – I am on the right side of history. Thank you Charlie, my staff and I will be in touch.

    (I watch as he strides gracefully out of the room, the truth I provided him held firmly by his side; in the hand of providence.)

    Twenty Minutes With The President 080909sig

    ————————————————————————————————————————

    A comprehensive bibliography containing all of the evidence presented above can be viewed at http://www.prisonplanet.com/20_minutes_bibliography.html

    Get this interview in PDF format here.

    Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.

    This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.

    Charlie Sheen.

    Charlie Sheen is going to be on Alex Jones’ syndicated radio show live twice this week. This letter to the President is only the opening salvo in a chain of key events. Read more details here and tune in at 11am CST when Alex will lay out this exciting new development. Sheen first appeared on The Alex Jones Show in March 2006 to air his doubts about the official 9/11 story, an interview that garnered national attention and put the issue of 9/11 truth at the forefront of public debate.


    For media requests on this subject email sheen@infowars.com.

    42 comments:

    1. Charlie Sheen w/Alex Jones.. now is the time to demand the truth.. Listen here:

      http://www.infowars.com/charlie-sheen-now-is-the-time-to-demand-the-truth/

      ReplyDelete
    2. I PREDICT

      I predict the mess media will not touch this even with a ten-foot pole. This will go the way of Sybil Edmonds deposition, (crickets).

      ReplyDelete
    3. I predict you are correct oh great Carnak ! I still love Charlie for doing this <3 He's obsessed as are many of us in the truth movement.

      I'm trying to help spread the word.

      ReplyDelete
    4. He's not stupid,
      he knows
      like coto

      " .. that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside."

      He knows
      what they did to Jack

      ReplyDelete
    5. There are Architects & Engineers and Scholars for 9/11 Truth etc. How about Hollywood Actors, or "Movie Stars" for 9/11 Truth?

      How much F'n money do these actors need anyway? Huh! Most have multiple homes and live lavish lifestyles, but that isn't going to amount to a hill of freakin beans if and when our country crumbles under the weight of these Godforsaken illegal wars of hegemony, now will it?

      Our country is very, very sick and continuing this charade of normalcy is only going to worsen the dilemma. As everyone is aware, the money being spent on these illegal wars could be put to a much better use here at home, rebuilding A M E R I C A !

      And F' Keith Olbermann and Glenn Beck. F' them both. They could care less about this once great country of ours. Pretending they care about America.

      As Charlie Sheen stated; "Our country and it's people deserve better."

      Thank you Jersey Girl for posting the article.

      ReplyDelete
    6. A phoenix could rise out of the ground in the Rose Garden as Barry (he's not Barack Obama - he's Barry Soetoro) gave a press conference, and not one of these pretend-to-be-human-beings would notice it unless told to notice it.

      They don't see obvious - they see nothing.

      I have come to the conclusion that indeed the manifestation of a super-class of cross over humanoids are already with us.

      These shells of former people - zombies, as it were - have been placed in enough places of influence so as to keep the really dim among us believing the myth, as should time should come to spring their final trap.

      That's the only excuse there is for what's going on, that I can see, unless of course anyone has anything to add?

      ReplyDelete
    7. Munich.. they are rebuilding America into Amerika !! as Aj says.. "home of the cowards, land of the slaves"!

      ANd I'm with you f*** Olbermann & Beck, both shills of the msm that don't give a flying leap about the people or the country. ALl they're doin' is collectin' a big, fat paycheck as America burns and freedom dies.

      ReplyDelete
    8. M, gotta go with the people are zombified and the elite are the reptoids that Icke speaks of.. Not even half human... shape shifters to fool us.
      There doesn't seem to be any other logical explanation.

      ReplyDelete
    9. We must accept the fact that even under the unlikely scenario that Obama is straight, we would have to conclude the effect of 911 truth coming to light.

      I have read some material regarding psychiatric opinion on the reality of what would become of an exposure to the true history and science of mans exisitence.

      With current research into Chaos Theory, the Butterfly effect, cause /effect, domino or ripple effect etc. must be considered. In Psychology the cognitive sciences are theories but there are some serious considerations.

      We the COTO's of the world may be the variant to the attentional capture the Committee has had on the people for years. We may be subject to 'inattentional blindness' to their managed and controlled paradigm.

      The mainstream, mass/people in the middle, the majority may be the success of temporal capture and the level of cognitive control over capture is held by the COMMITTEE.

      Obama may be a Beta baby himself or a insider in this scheme. But consider the vast unknown research for hundreds of years and the hidden truths.

      "You can't handle the truth" ~ echoes from the Pentagon

      Charlie opviously posesses serious inattentional blindness as we do. His efforts may get him two and a half times trouble but I love his passion. Of course I want the expose' out, but I am just a monkey.

      We share roughly 98% of our DNA sequences with the chimpanzee. For COTO folks here we are maybe only sharing 95%.

      It's that 5% they want. Time for a mandated vaccine I believe.

      We want to open the entire Pandora's Box, but the butterfy effect could have us being the ones who destroy the world or save it. Hmmmm!

      ReplyDelete
    10. u predict wrong reuters have

      http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS252554+08-Sep-2009+PRN20090908

      if that link doesnt work go via charliesheens offical website it can be accessed through there, some ppl i know have had trouble with clicking onto this link but it works for me

      ReplyDelete
    11. im listening to an online radio program listening to ppl bag alex jones for this stunt, if anyone cared to read the WHOLE article then they would of known that this was fictional,, i cant see what the big deal is really, alex and charlie have not misled anyone

      ReplyDelete
    12. " in the hand of providence "

      ReplyDelete
    13. Well those people are idiots. What program is it? I noticed AJ turned off the comments on the Sheen articles.

      Thank god for people like Sheen & Jones that broadcast the truth. Is that reuters article for real? When this shows up on mainstream tv..then and only then will the public awaken. It just might but if it does they will make Charlie look like a drug addled lunatic or something to counteract his message, the bastards.

      Way to go Charlie, there are millions of us with you. Let's hope some of your Hollywood buddies start showing you their support by coming out of the 9/11 closet.

      ReplyDelete
    14. Yeah jerseyg i agree with your comments, its a great way to attract attention to the truth.
      im listening to Lee Rodgers, online radio,..this dj is either dyslexic or has research skills of an 2 yr old, He starts his show by bagging the hell out of aj unawaringly this was a publicity stunt, now Lee you should of scrolled down more its there in print

      "Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet."

      wasnt until one intelligent caller out of the whole lot of them was able to inform Mr Rodgers that this was a publicity stunt, so now he has had to change his tune and sook about the stunt ..listening to caller after caller , making the same comments tells me there are alot of ppl out there that do not read all the information provided , and if a someone is going to do a radio show least learn how to bloody research first, im sure Lee Rodgers isnt the only one , i think rense has done exactly the same thing

      ReplyDelete
    15. It wouldn't hurt if we all made an effort getting on C-Span, or any other talk shows for a while and pushed this issue, especially on 9/11.

      As Gandhi said: "Everything we do is meaningless, but we must do it anyway."

      ReplyDelete
    16. the Lee rodgers hour,, lee closed his show by saying he is doin an expose on alex jones in his website

      http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/archives.php?who=LiveFreeOrDie

      this is his audio,, he makes me so angry

      ReplyDelete
    17. Uh, YOU would be wrong... the Reuters "article" is a PRESS RELEASE written by Jones and his crew and PAID FOR by InfoWars to have a PR company get it published...

      "This release was issued on behalf of the above organization by Send2Press(R),
      a unit of Neotrope(R). http://www.Send2Press.com

      SOURCE The Alex Jones Show

      Rob Dew or Mike Nelson, both of The Alex Jones Show,"

      Jones justified his fake news story... with another fake news story...

      http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/jones-justifies-his-fake-news-story-with-another-fake-news-story/

      ReplyDelete
    18. This is the link to the Archived version of the story BEFORE Jones and Sheen added the line that it "hasn't happened yet"... MEANING they DID mislead EVERYONE by pretending it was a real news story...

      He also made a big deal announcing "the biggest story ever" the day before... you mean to tell me the biggest 911 story is a fake interview?

      http://www.abovetopsecret.com/Twenty_Minutes_with_the_President.html

      and you don't think this crap hurts our credibility"

      take a read outside the echo chamber.. why do you think Jones turned comments off HIS ENTIRE SITE?

      "Lets make it as simple and clear as possible:
      You cannot claim to be searching for the truth..when you engage in such deceit.
      You cannot claim to be a “truth” movement..when you engage in such tricks and games.
      You lose all credibility..when you have such little respect for integrity and honesty.
      Alex Jones has made a huge mistake."

      " This is unequivocal proof that 9/11 truthers do not know how to read. Mr Jones did us all a big favor by proving that they will believe ANYTHING, even if its admitted to be all made up….they will still think its the truth. Amazing."
      Brad | 09.08.09 – 3:54 pm

      "The collective stupidity of those idiots could launch the space shuttle!"
      Max | 09.08.09 – 1:46 pm

      "Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen are a disgrace to the Twoof Movement."
      Punxatawnybarney Petgoat Good | 09.08.09 – 1:48 pm

      "Virtually every commenter on Infowars thinks the transcript is for real. I wonder how long before this becomes another “fact” in truther rants: How come Obama never followed up on the hard questions Charlie Sheen asked in his interview?"
      Reality, sorry truthers | 09.08.09 – 2:00 pm

      " Infowars is clearly a faith-based initiative."
      Patrick from Cincinnati | 09.08.09 – 2:05 pm

      " The funniest part of that “interview” is the subtle plug for his t.v. show." Billman | Homepage | 09.08.09 – 6:25 pm

      ReplyDelete
    19. You're missin' the point here sparky. Is Jones a showman? Hell yea, that's what draws people to his show. But the fact is that Charlie Sheen wrote that letter and is requesting that 20 mins (more or less) with Obama.

      That's a brave move by Sheen. We need more celebrities to bring 9/11 to the masses that only know tv & movie personalities. How do you think Obama won the election?
      Sheen has been a "truther" since day 1. He's putting his entire career and possibly life on the line going this public with it. He's calling out the POTUS for god sake.

      To say nothing of the fact that Richard Gage, Webster Tarpley and also today Stephen Jones praise Jones for getting the word about 9/11 out to the people and giving them an opportunity to present their case to his ever growing radio audience.

      Sheen explained the whole putting the line that "this didn't happen..yet" at the bottom of the article. They wanted to pull people in so that they'd read the entire thing. GOOD MOVE I SAY ! False advertising.. nuhuh...

      Sounds like a buncha wannabe sour grapes out there to me.....

      ReplyDelete
    20. aren't you the one who was agreeing with the video up earlier that Obama's name meant he was the devil coming to earth on a lightning bolt?

      Yeah... for those people here still capable of critical, lateral thought processes, I suggest you consider exactly what the consequences to the Truth movement are when when some of it's "Leaders" flat out lie to their followers.

      Jones is a conman. And just like many conmen, he may be a "showman" like you say, but this movement doesn't need sideshow barkers, it needs credible advocates.

      Jersey... You go on back to your idol worship and your "Obama is Satan" threads, ok? And frankly, I don't give a f* about Webster Tarpley... I have been around this movement long enough to know what he is too. Frankly I am not surprised you are sticking with Jones on this one. The first thing he and his people did yesterday morning was run around erasing comments from his own followers when they found out it was all bullshit. Kinda like someone around here did a while back. You supported her as well, so frankly, just par for the course for you.

      ReplyDelete
    21. First get your facts straight, I said I had no trouble thinking of Obama as a demon but I didn't think he was satan. I said Levin should look for 3 6's on his head at night.. A JOKE.

      So Richard Gage is not a leader in the 9/11 truth movement? Really, I mean REALLY? Stephen Jones isn't either? What's wrong with Tarpley?

      No one was lied to. You just have a bug up your ass about Jones as you always have. The comments were shut down because the site almost crashed from the traffic. I tried to get on at noon yesterday and couldn't. It's obvious you've never read the comments on AJ's site. They are jam packed w/ jones haters and obama zombies and he leaves them up for all to see. I always thought there should be SOME moderation there but oh well.

      Btw, Who are YOUR people for 9/11 truth and what have they done to wake up the masses of braindead tv zombies?

      ReplyDelete
    22. " We share roughly 98%
      of our DNA sequences
      with the chimpanzee.
      For COTO folks here
      we are maybe only sharing 95%."

      yea, well I'm a Cat
      and Cats hunt Rats

      Do any of you Chimps
      remember the story
      about the 'Put Options'
      bet against UAL and AA ?

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125243142790893017.html

      ReplyDelete
    23. However it all went down, AJ's sig on the thing rids it of all credibility. Fact being, once "infowar" or "Alex Jones" is thrown into the mix or added to the signature, the complete batch is rendered useless, inedible and incredible.

      Rense, Tarpley, Gage, (Dr. Stephen) Jones, etc. cannot lend even one grain of credibility to AJ or infowars as they themselves lack credibility in most circles.

      The most devout followers of any (combination) of the above mentioned "info warriors" will accept this recent intelligence manouver delivered to us via our favorite media outlet, the world wide web as a good move. Most others will shrug it off as just another piece of trash left at our doorsteps by (any one of) those mentioned above while those with a better understanding of modern intelligence MOs will immediately criticize the manouver as deliberate and even damaging, carried out by agents put in place to "spearhead" the movement, win the majority over and lead them astray at precisely the most effective moment and position.

      99% of the truth is still not the truth. The truth, not = a lie.

      Disinfo & Misinfo. There really IS a war on for your minds.

      ReplyDelete
    24. Curt, ok. You keep saying this but don't explain yourself.

      So you know the "truth" and Gage is a disinfo agent. Then what brought those buildings down on 9/11. Wasn't controlled demolition? Cause that's what Gage has been saying all along with excellent presentations to illustrate that point. Also, what is the disinfo Gage, the Jones boys and others are spreading and why? What they say makes perfect sense when observed with our very own eyes and mind. Or perhaps you'd rather we believe in holograms and laser beams?

      Please enlighten us as to the "truth" free of "disinfo" crap like explosions in buildings and molten metal pouring down the sides of the buildings that can be heard and seen by our own lyin' eyes.

      Here's your chance on the day before the 9/11 anniversary. What do YOU think brought them down? And why do you say Jones & company are disinfo agents? For what purpose and to what end?

      What is that 1% of non truth you keep going on about?

      ReplyDelete
    25. Yea Tony, please enlighten us.

      http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KI11Ak02.html

      ReplyDelete
    26. ***UPDATE*** InfoWars, one of Alex Jones’ advertising heavy websites, is running the Reuters PR piece written by Jones’ people at InfoWars AS IF it were a real Reuters news article.

      Over at InforWars, they have removed any and ALL references to PRNewswire and Send2press that were included in the original press release posting from Reuters and they have removed the names of Jones’ staff members who wrote it.

      They are actually pretending it is a real news story. They edited out the first line where it says “PRNewswire release” and no authors are credited with the article. And of course, this is left off at the bottom of the article…

      This release was issued on behalf of the above organization by Send2Press(R),
      a unit of Neotrope(R). http://www.Send2Press.com

      SOURCE The Alex Jones Show

      Rob Dew or Mike Nelson, both of The Alex Jones Show

      More blatant dishonesty from a self-proclaimed “leader” of the Truth movement… and he still has the comments turned off so that his own supporters can’t publicly call him out for the fraud.

      ReplyDelete
    27. from my understand reuters is pretty mainstream.. fox news has also given the story a mention, but as all conscious ppl like us would know there would be some catch, fox made it quiet sure they would refresh our memories about charlies history of drug abuse,

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,548400,00.html??test=faces

      ah least u can expect from fox, but it did make the mainstream media

      ReplyDelete
    28. no i cant agree alex jones is a con man actually. His approach to the issue is merely a psychological tactic to wake ppl up. lets look at it like this , new block buster movie is about to hit the cinemas , eg batman, now if there is no "hype" who will care or even want to go . His way of presenting his msg is along the same lines, because this is how human being are programmed. we need there to be hype to take notice, remember.. the sheep arnt like us , they arent conscious.

      as for every commenter thinking the transcript is for real , well maybe if they read the whole article from start to finish they would have realized it was not a transcript of an actual interview that had occurred. im sure you are a very intelligent person and would have recognized this yourself :) obviously some ppl merely browse articles dont read all the information then make uninformed judgements

      at the end of the day alex jones is doing what we all should be doing and that is getting exposure to the truth. never had i ever heard him lie or mislead the ppl..thankyou to his documentaries i have been able to wake up some pretty unwakeable ppl.

      at the end of the day its the message he is putting out there now how he is doing it, he is pro active and he believes in what he is doing, and bloody good on him i say because its more then u and i are doing!!

      ReplyDelete
    29. Tinman here. We're not in Kansas anymore.

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      C.O.T.O.
      "If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without them knowing it." ~ Edward Bernays, who in his book "Propaganda", argued that the manipulation of public opinion was a necessary part of democracy
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      You already know the 1%. Not here to teach, I kindly remind you to hold on to your critical vanatagepoint, especially when it comes to the voices of GCN.

      Your reactions to what I said above don't quite interlock or reflect my words. Instead, you decide to distort. It's up to you, your decision, so be my guest but do go forward aware that you'll have to do better. I would also advise you to work on improving your level of reading comprehension prior to entering any debate. It really helps when you stick to the facts and build your counter around that which your opponent has said, not around what your mind, for which there is indeed a war on for, has heard or read. Do go back and read again, that which I said (above & elsewhere).

      On 9/11, we all know that that which we have been served as explanations are in fact lies. We also know that that which we know is less than what we need to know in order to present an all ecompassing explanation of the events of that day. In other words, no one of us has all the answers yet each of us can easily dismantle the official CT.

      Carry on and beware of those you have come to trust almost blindly.

      And read. Read a few FMs for a change. I've dropped the numbers on many occasions. Perhaps not here, but certainly elsewhere (RBCII under "who pays these people?" e.g., JG) where you too can go and read.

      Intelligence/Counter-intelligence MOs are no secret at all. All you have to do is search for, find and read.

      ReplyDelete
    30. tony you wrote -

      " while those with a better understanding of modern intelligence MOs will immediately criticize the manouver as deliberate and even damaging, carried out by agents put in place to “spearhead” the movement, win the majority over and lead them astray at precisely the most effective moment and position."

      then you wrote -

      "Your reactions to what I said above don’t quite interlock or reflect my words. Instead, you decide to distort. It’s up to you, your decision, so be my guest but do go forward aware that you’ll have to do better. I would also advise you to work on improving your level of reading comprehension prior to entering any debate. It really helps when you stick to the facts and build your counter around that which your opponent has said, not around what your mind, for which there is indeed a war on for, has heard or read. Do go back and read again, that which I said (above & elsewhere).

      - tonyforest 9/10/09


      so you have a
      "better understanding of modern intelligence"

      you think this was
      " carried out by agents put in place to 'spearhead' the movement" ?

      ReplyDelete
    31. Curt, what are you talkin' about? I asked you how Gage was a disinfo agent? Answer the question please. I also asked how Jones & the others are spreading disinfo. Why would they spread disinfo which wakes people up to 9/11 being an inside job and then going out and proving it with very respected and convincing architects and engineers ?

      Please don't condescend. I know all about Bernays. I'm asking how you think it applies here. You skirted all around what you stated and my questions.

      Also, no I don't know what the 1% is. I'm not as smart as you, remember? So please fill me in on that too.

      Oh and please tell us how you think the buildings came down if not in the way Gage and the others speak of. Your whole reply to me just went round in circles and offered no substantive info. I'm interested in your theory and your 9/11 experts opinions.

      Thanks muchly :)

      ReplyDelete
    32. podzemi - "you think this was
      ” carried out by agents put in place to ’spearhead’ the movement” ?"

      In my opinion? Yes, AJ is a spearhead. The question always being, is this person aware he is being used to spearhead a movement or is he deliberately and actively fulfilling a mission. If he is aware, when did he become aware? I think you get the picture.

      The 1% is always going to be the parts thrown out to distract us, or lead us astray, away from the real answers. If an agent delivers 99% truth, it's damned hard to see the 1% untruth. Not to be confused with a healthy portion of scepticism which I know we all have in our dufflebags, the 1% is something to be aware of and looked for in each and every bit of information we process, not matter what the source. It may come as a lie or simple avoidance of a certain word or topic.

      It's been a while, a long while. Info agents went to work on day one. Can you identify three that are still active today? I can. Two such agents were successful in splitting the movement overnight. One of the two has been successful in marginalizing what remains of the more plump part of the movement. One agent was successful in taking a minor portion of the movement for ride without a return ticket. For proof of this, just see JG's comment using the words "holograms and laser beams".

      My personal opinion is irrelevant here and I'm not going to begin to lay it out as I'm running short of time this morning and have to check into hospital in a few hours. Funny, I didn't even notice the date matched 9/11 until yesterday. I've had this appointment for over a month.

      JG, Gage is doing a great job and he's very successful at what he's doing. I'm as much impressed with the man as I am with so many others. But still, he marginilizes. I know, I know, you may not see what I'm getting at but others just might. Remember what gatekeeping was all about?

      You really have to keep an open mind when touching on 9/11. Once you throw one idea out the door, you reduce your chances of getting the facts straight. There's no need to carry all possibilities and theories around with you as active items, just don't throw them out the door. Keep them instead, keep them in a mental pouch you might wanna label (maybe later).

      AJ? Again, I only had to listen to AJ for a month or so and it hit me straight in the face. The dude is damned good at what he's doing and I like him. He's very entertaining. But he sure does have ya'all following him around town while he blows his whistle. Now don't say is isn't so just because your feelings are hurt because it IS so. Stand back and look at yourselves! AJbots. Shame on you.

      A new investigaion WILL come to be. It was planned all along. Of course there will be one. It too will be a whitewash. No doubt in my mind about that. And once it's over, the movement will sink into the mud and become immobile while even other agents step in to keep the movement there by further discrediting us with outlandish ideas, theories and as usual, 99% of the truth.

      9/11 was one hell of an operation. It must have cost a fortune. Guess who paid for it.

      ReplyDelete
    33. Contentious , nit-pickers or shills? Can't make up my mind, maybe both?

      Trying to trash AJ for what he's doing is complete BS.

      Is he a polished professional? No. He has never claimed to be. Tactics aside, it's the message that matters.

      Personally I don't give a rat's ass how the message gets out. Most people aren't keen enough to pick-up on the subtleties of various promotional tactics. One thing is for sure, they work wonders for those perpetuating the lie.

      So what do we have here? Shills that have been placed among us to fragment our commitment to getting our message out? It's already happened twice, does anyone think they'd stop?

      We'll keep trying, as they will keep trying to silence us.

      Fact is, I don't care if Alex Jones never comes in first, he'll always be a horse I'd bet on.

      ReplyDelete
    34. Thanks M! Was wonderin' where the Jones posse was.

      ReplyDelete
    35. The "Jones posse".....

      scuse me while I ROFLMWAO !

      Look into GCN when you get a chance. And Hollywood, is the long arm of D.C.

      ReplyDelete
    36. Correction, Langley, Va., not (only) D.C.

      ReplyDelete
    37. Ya liked that curt? me too!

      ReplyDelete
    38. JG, we have three, maybe four kinds of solid idiots on C.O.T.O.

      1) the Alex Jones Posse

      Complete idiots because they follow AJ and parrot his dogma as if he were Jesus Christ himself or as if he were the one who invinted Irish Butter !

      2) the Libertarianism Posse

      A dangerous crowd because if that which they want to happen actually happens, they themselves would be in deep shit or up the proverbial creek without a paddle.

      3) a combination of the above

      Sickos

      4) none of the above

      Complete idiots for hanging on on C.O.T.O. after having seen the assholes behind the curtain.

      You, imo, do not belong to #4 and no, I don't like that.

      Can ya smell the compliment?

      ReplyDelete
    39. Wait, what? I don't belong to #4 so I'm all of the above then? oh, nevermind.

      I don't see any idiots here. I see people who have different points of view about some things and agreeing on many others. Mostly where civil liberties are concerned. When it comes to issues of personal freedom I am one hell of a libertarian. However, I believe in helping those that cannot help themselves and believe the free market is a free pass for corporate greed. There can be no free market because without regulation big fish eats little fish. BUT with corrupt govt regulation palms are greased and big fish STILL eats little fish. So what the hell is the solution? I don't know. I'm not that smart. The only solution I see is for humans to evolve into beings of higher consciousness. Fat chance of that happening.

      So anyway that leaves me a far left leaning libertarian. Oh hell, I hate bloody labels ! You can't tag me with one. Don't even bother trying.

      I think it's that way with most here. (levin sheridan excluded of course)

      I credit Alex Jones with supplying me with valuable verifiable info. It's up to each one of us to take what info is put out there, do our own research and think things through for ourselves.

      There isn't one person here that has all the pieces to the puzzle. We are all just speculating and trying to work things out in our heads. Idiots don't have the capacity to do that. I repeat, there are no idiots here.

      ReplyDelete
    40. Purrrrrr ...........

      the voices in my head, are they me?

      ReplyDelete
    41. Want to wake America up to the truth regarding 9/11? Here’s how…….

      http://blandyland.com/?p=388

      Please leave a comment voicing your support for this idea. It is a very small price to pay considering everything that has happened in our world based on the tragic events of that fateful September morning.

      Thanks,

      Daniel Edd Bland III
      www.BlandyLand.com

      ReplyDelete