While pondering how to unite and agree to draft individuals to be OUR public servants and usurp the Rothschild financial interests that presently manipulate our world to their benefit and our destruction, here is another little something to intrigue and motivate you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFIGeINof0Y&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfEpXAYwVIo&feature=player_embedded
And note how, with all those who must have been implicated in this conspiracy and its implementation, they maintain total silence and secrecy. That should be an indicator as to the identity of those involved, silent all these millennia about the true nature of the fiction of' the 'money' they inflict on us - And of the hold that they must have over their accomplices.
UNITE! AGREE! DRAFT! REPLACE!
good post Flak, thanks.
ReplyDeleteIt always puzzled me the way they kept replaying it over and over and over again.
well if you want to brainwash the sheepies, thats the way to do it!
no other disaster(term used loosely) is or has been treated this way, but if you wanted to keep hurting people, make them get angry, the twisting the knife in a wound s a great way to do so.
this chaps work is certainly worth watching. I like tha fact he was forthcoming about himself too, it helps stop the anonymous poster issue , that bedevils the serious fault finding, by concerned people. Mind you with the disappearing and dead whistleblowers we all know why, people are careful.
I thought this was an excellent analysis and presentation. It holds true that we cannot always believe our eyes, and certainly cannot trust our very own leaders and their propaganda MSM machine.
ReplyDeleteAccountability, and a Real Investigation Now!
You can't "Photoshop" video.
ReplyDeleteThis "No PLanes Bullshit" is propaganda to distract from real physical evidence. Just the newest craze to lead the naive off to the green pastures of catnip.
Yea yea yea...sock it to me Flakass. Make my day.
\\ll//
Whatever, Hybridrogue1. I think you're limiting the possibilities of cinematic snookery possibilities.
ReplyDeleteNone-the-less; the "How" is important, and provides evidence for conviction of the "Who", but I believe there exists a colossal amount of other evidence beyond the "video" of the planes. So, I'm not superglued to planes, balls, missiles, planted explosives or exotic weaponry considerations. It IS a False Flag insider job, and the Bush administration covered it up, and used it to attack Iraq & Afghanistan.
Treason all the way. Firing squad or a rope trick will do.
You know, Whitten, your mouth is not your best friend, is it. You might do better by going back just shooting from the hip.
ReplyDeleteYou might also review your comments. You are a rude creature and do yourself no favours, showing yourself to be the boor you presumably are. But then, as I said before, I suspect that is why you are here.
1. " Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
simple: NO
It's not called "PHOTOSHOP" for no reason!
If you wanna edit videos, use Adobe Premiere "
2. " How to turn your photo into movie-like effect using Photoshop?
FREE! Carbon Fiber Wallpaper
FREE - Brushed Metal Photoshop Style
How to DIY your own carbon fiber wallpaper?
Quick way to remove background without using lasso tool in Photoshop
Portfolio
Transformers high resolution . . . . . "
But then, distraction, distraction, distraction - I did warn the rest of you folks.
Adobe Premiere, is not Photoshop. Maya is not Photoshop. Vegas video editor is not Photoshop.
ReplyDeleteThat is my point.
But beyond this no planes slight of hands, there is the fact that the zionist controlled media hand in hand with the zionist controlled military industrial complex is already the prime suspect.
I have been on to 9/11 as a psyop from the day it came down. And everyone on this site knows this through past experience going all the way back to Kallshits site.
My disagreement with this particular take on 9/11 is my true opinion, one based on 20 years in special effects cinema by the way.
To my eye it is the magic ball that is your video editor culprit. The most simple form to construct in any of these modeling programs, a simple ball.
I would take this sort of thing more seriously if Physics 9/11 hadn't torn this theory apart more than five years ago when the issue first surfaced. I can dig that article up for you if you wish.
But I will say this much now. When I saw that you had posted this, I knew you were laying a trap for me in particular.
At first I was going to pass on it, it is a minor matter, no matter how big an issue you want to pump it up into. But after further consideration I figured I might as well have it out with you once and for all.
As far as being a “rude creature”, I don't go in for your subtle chickenshit innuendo. If I have something to say I don't chew around the edges. So you want to spill your shit about what my name is supposed to reveal to you hot shot, spit it out. It's interesting that I don't know your real name isn't it Flakass?
“But then, as I said before, I suspect that is why you are here.”--Flakass
Well hot shot, no more hinting around, give me your best shot. Because I will tell you flat out that I think you are a provocateur, you and your buttbuddy Camus. You open advocation to violence is what caught my attention. Either stupid on your part, or protected as an agent.
The second is you perpetual taunting, and singling me out for it. Your the one making the hot ditch effort to cut this crew in half, and indeed your methods are transparent and revealing.
So I wish to cordially invite you once again to kiss my ass.
With the height of utter disrespect, William Whitten \\ll//
"Because I will tell you flat out that I think you are a provocateur"
ReplyDelete"Your the one making the hot ditch effort to cut this crew in half, and indeed your methods are transparent and revealing."
I have had no previous reason to criticise anyone else here, and I have been here since the outset.
I need not say another word.
That's quite interesting. I think since none of us know whether there were actual planes or missiles or holograms or lasers or whatever used we should all keep an open mind. Probably a combination of effects.. smoke and mirrors ..always smoke and mirrors.
ReplyDeleteOne thing that I do know as fact, planes do not disintegrate into nothingness after crashing like they did on 9/11. No luggage, no bodies strewn about.. wtf? are you kidding me? So something really unusual happened to them or they weren't really planes at all......
Well JG,
ReplyDeleteI don't know how many of the hundreds of Youtube videos you may have watched from independent folks with hand held camcorders who caught various angles of the second plane coming in. I find the idea that every single one of these was a do up of the mesmer team.
Nothing is impossible though--it could have been an attack from Mars...and they just don't want to tell us, for all of the obvious 'national security reasons'
For the time being I will stick with Jones and Ryan at 911physics, and leave these leaps into the outer limits to the joystick kids.
\\ll//
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200610/Salter.pdf
ReplyDeleteA Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories
By Eric Salter
Version 2
29 September 2006
Unlike the first hit, the multiple videos and photographs of the second hit clearly show a 767, so the noplaners are forced to claim that these videos were faked with computer graphics, overlaid in real-time on live TV or on tape afterward.
*>>Why the perps would resort to this risky operation when there was no technical obstacle to flying a plane into a building is never credibly explained.<<*
In reality, the perpetrators would have found out about each image that they didn't control only after the image appeared on the web or in the media. And then it would have been too late to alter the image.
The TV fakery hypothesis, therefore, is utterly absurd.
****************************[\\ll//********
I suggest a reading of the entire article before falling for this flimsy Youtube 'expose'.
Well personally, My believe has always been that there were remote controlled planes that hit the twin towers and that bldgs were brought down by controlled demolition (as was WTC7) after bombs had previously been planted inside when they had that power down. After all the explosions were audible and heard by many.
ReplyDeleteI think the pentagon was hit by a missle and that the Shanksville plane was blown out of the sky.
Rather the conventional theory for most truthers. However, I don't limit the possiblity that other events took place that day either.
I love looking at any and all theories others come up with. I don't see how it can discredit the movement any more than it is what with all of us truthers being homegrown terrrorists and all that anyway!
Yea, I am with you on the "conventional truthers" scenareo as well.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy looking at all the possiblitos as well, but mainly for entertainment.
Try throwing this super wacky at the uninitiated though, and you blow your crediblilty in one shot, perhaps to set their teeth the wrong way forever.
That's why I see this the same way as a lot of the JFK books that threw out wild stories to distract from the core issues--Blood in the street? Open the fire hydrants, flood it out.
That is the way I see the "No Planer" trap.
\\ll//
I do too. Remote planes hit the towers and the regular flights were diverted to some where quiet airstrip where they were murdered.
ReplyDeleteEM pulse howitzers brought down the towers with or without additional explosives. Scalar weapons are the biggest secret held tight in their sweaty little hands. All the strange weather phenomenon at that time tells me Judy Wood is on her game.
Now that one I am more than willing to consider...the scalar weapons deal.
ReplyDeleteAnd I am convinced on the remote planes. All of the passengers ending up on the Shanksville flt. and taken out by a missle. The Ohio airport with the NASA facility seems to be where all the passengers were collated and put on the last plane.
"We were set up to fail"--Kean and Hamilton
\\ll//
It is possible they all lay at the bottom of the Atlantic. TITANIC
ReplyDeleteThe strange case of the 'toasted cars' and the portion of the building that turned to dust after the collapse, and the sizable holes/craters in the debris fields of the buildings; esp WTC 6 makes me think that Dr wood is indeed onto an aspect of that day, but I must say I agree Dov Zakheim's remote control planes did the deed at the WTC, a missile hit the pentagon, and Shanksville flight was shot down...I actually saw a video of the Governor of North Dakota giving out two medals to a flight crew after 9-11 that seemed to be for deeds done that day; and what other action could have performed that day as it was filled to the brim with IN-action.
ReplyDeleteSOMEBODY had to reward those brave boys for lighting up a whole plane-load of their fellow citizens after re-taking control of the flight deck and finding out the controls were locked (much like our "elections").
ReplyDeleteAnd SOMEBODY had to make the Air-Traffic Controllers an offer they couldn't refuse and feed their notes to the shredder... and SOMEBODY had to confiscate all the surveillance cameras.'' and flight recorders. WHO?
REAL AMERRIKAN HEROES, that's who!
Their signatures (evidence of complicity) are on the contract... not their brains.
Yup Brad. It was a Psyop straight from the PNAC boys, their term paper got the go-ahead from the 'Crown' as activation phase for the Middle East 'chessboard' match ala Dr. Z-breezy...and the Empire marches on.
ReplyDeleteAnd yet, there is this analysis which leaves me baffled, and belatedly apologetic as I can't sort this out, and must admit a big possible maybe at this point:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=_NRMgnXL9JQ&feature=related
However...I want to review everything I have as far as pedestrian videos, some of which I recall showing the second plane in clearly amature videos from a legion of different angles.
I do have questions--just one more video from another angle without the plane, that is obviously not fiddled with.
\\ll//
Okay Flakass,
ReplyDeleteIt is September 18, 2010. You made one more showing on this site a few days ago.
Again you were singling me out as your nemesis and enemy.Why? Because I was the only one to engage you and your jejune bullshit.
Everyone else 'politely' left the room when your fart bomb went off.
So, what do you think now? Am I the only one who thinks you're as crazy as a shithouse rat?
If you would take the flaming flare out of your ass on your pet topic, I imagine you would get a lot more interaction from your peers.
Think it over--no one has disinvited you from coto. I don't wish to censor anyone--but if you can't take the heat...that is your choice.
\\ll//
That is what I really admire about you, Whitten, to answer you personally since you ask me - Your innate courtesy and good manners. And also your childish vanity in that you seem to think that everyone has to please you exclusively, otherwise they are - what do you call us? - Oh, yes, just look.
ReplyDeleteAnd just look at your uninvited and uncalled-for insults. You show yourself in rather a bad light, you know, and very much let down the impression of 'Americans' to the various people around the world who know better how to conduct themselves. Don't you consider that somewhat boorishly infantile of a person of your claimed maturity? You don't have to be gross to show you are American, you know.
And has it crossed your tiny mind that others desist from comment for fear of uncurring your gracioius attention? Others were sufficiently approving before your intervention, if you care to look. There are others previously here who write much less frequently, if at all, since you began your performance. We might almost wonder why.
As it is, you have virtually taken over this site with your ever-present crude and censorious attitude. But then, I did note before, perhaps that is your function: to steer - as that is the function of steers.
As it is, I repeat that the only argument that you would understand would be with a piece of 4 x 2, which I would be pleased to administer were I within range to teach you the manners that were all too obviously previously omitted from your education.
Well See,
ReplyDeleteSo here we are. You have had your say. I have had mine.
All I really meant, is I don't like you anymore than you like me.
But that doesn't mean we can't both share this site regardless.
Like I alluded to, if you choose to pout, that is your choice.
YOUR OWN CHOICE buckaroo.
Blaming me for it is the assinine part, because I am in essence trying to invite you back asshole.
\\ll//
\\ll//
Flak,
ReplyDeleteWhy don't you learn some chops for your goals.
This guy's better than your mentor Trotsky, hands down:
Military mastermind: Lawrence of Arabia's 15 principles of modern guerrilla warfare
1. Strive above all to win hearts and minds
2. Establish an unassailable base
3. Remain strategically dispersed
4. Make maximum use of mobility
5. Operate mainly in small, local groups
6. Remain largely detached from the enemy
7. Do not attempt to hold ground
8. Operate in depth rather than en face (i.e. not in lines)
9. Aim for perfect intelligence about the enemy
10. Concentrate only for momentary tactical superiority
11. Strike only when the enemy can be taken by surprise
12. Never engage in sustained combat
13. Always have lines of retreat open
14. Make war on matériel rather than on men
15. Make a virtue of the individuality, irregularity, and unpredictability of guerrillas
*Plus, never consider a job you're not talented for.* savvy putz?
\\ll//