Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Deceptive Economic Statistics: While the economists lied the US economy died

Paul Craig Roberts
Infowars.com
August 17, 2010

On August 17, Bloomberg reported a US government release that industrial production rose twice as much as forecast, climbing 1 percent. Bloomberg interpreted this to mean that “increased business investment is propelling the gains in manufacturing, which accounts for 11 percent of the world’s largest economy.”























geithner4.jpg
Secretary Treasury Tim Geithner welcomed us to “the recovery.”

The stock market rose.

Let’s look at this through the lens of statistician John Williams of shadowstats.com. Williams reports that “the primary driver of a 1.0% monthly gain in seasonally-adjusted July industrial production” was “warped seasonal factors” caused by “the irregular patterns in U.S. auto production in the last two years.” Industrial production “shrank by 1.0% before seasonal adjustments.”

If the government and Bloomberg had announced that industrial production fell by 1.0% in July, would the stock market have risen 104 points on August 17?



Notice that Bloomberg reports that manufacturing accounts for 11 percent of the US economy. I remember when manufacturing accounted for 18% of the US economy. The decline of 39% is due to jobs offshoring.

Think about that. Wall Street and shareholders and executives of transnational corporations have made billions by moving 39% of US manufacturing offshore to boost the GDP and employment of foreign countries, such as China, while impoverishing their former American work force. Congress and the economics profession have cheered this on as “the New Economy.”

Bought-and-paid-for-economists told us that “the new economy” would make us all rich, and so did the financial press. We were well rid, they claimed, of the “old” industries and manufactures, the departure of which destroyed the tax base of so many American cities and states and the livelihood of millions of Americans.

The bought-and-paid-for-economists got all the media forums for a decade. While they lied, the US economy died.

Now, back to statistical deception. On August 17, the census Bureau reported a small gain in July 2010 residential construction housing starts. More hope orchestrated. In fact, the “gain,” as John Williams reports, was due to a large downward revision” in June’s reporting. The reported July “gain” would “have been a contraction” without the downward revision in June’s “gain.”

So, the overestimate of June housing not only made June look good, but also the downward correction of the June number makes July look good, because starts rose above the corrected June number. The same manipulation is likely to happen again next month.

If the government will lie to you about Iraqi weapons of mass production, Iranian nukes, and 9/11, why won’t they lie to you about the economy?


  • We now have an all-time high of Americans on food stamps, 40.8 million people, about 14% of the population. By next year the government estimates that food stamp dependency will rise to 43 million Americans. So last week Congress cut food stamp benefits. Let them eat cake.

    Wherever one looks — food stamps, home foreclosures, bankrupted states, mounting joblessness — the message to long-suffering Americans from “their government” is the same: go eat cake, while we fight wars for Israel that enrich the military/security complex, and while we bail out banksters whose annual incomes are in the tens of millions of dollars and up.


It is impossible to get any truth out of the US government about anything. If private companies used US government accounting, the executives would be prosecuted, convicted, and incarcerated.

“Our government” is committed to fighting wars to enrich the military/security complex and Israel’s territorial expansion at the expense of cuts in Social Security and Medicare. All most members of Congress, especially Republicans, want to do is to pay for the pointless wars by cutting Social Security and Medicare.

When they worry about the deficit, it is usually Social Security and Medicare — so-called “entitlements” that are in the crosshairs.

You don’t have to be smart to see that Wall Street’s and the government’s response to the amazing US budget deficit is not to stop the senseless wars and bailouts of mega-millionaires, but to cut “entitlements.”

I will end this column on unemployment. “Our government” tells us that the unemployment rate is just under 10 percent, a figure that would have wrecked any post-Great Depression administration. But, again, “our government” is lying. The reported unemployment rate is just below 10% because the US government no longer, since the corrupt Clinton administration, counts Americans who have been unemployed for longer than one year. Once the unemployed hit one year and one day, they are dropped from the unemployment roles and no longer counted as unemployed.

Compare this fact with the number you read from the financial press. Right now, if measured according to the methodology of 1980, the US unemployment rate is about 22%. Thus, the reported rate of unemployment hides more than half of the unemployed.

And, in the August 2 New York Times, Secretary Treasury Tim Geithner welcomed us to “the recovery.”

Utterly amazing.

10 comments:

  1. We are 'governed' by and mentally fed by a wide-spread gang of skillful gangsters. Of this there is no doubt.

    It is clear that things cannot improve, but will only deteriorate, until we rid ourselves of these criminals and their accomplice jacks-in-office.

    Now you can tell me how to effect the expulsion of the criminals who aid them, and their replacement with obligatorily honest representatives who will have to work to benefit the peoples of the planet by ridding us of the finaciers and their military-industrial complex.

    I address that requirement particularly to any element here who habitually argue merely to obstruct, and I again ask them to produce rather than simply 'challenge' or now tell us, 'Too late'. It is a sad thought that, if we do not think and act constructively, humanity will go out not with a whimper, but - if they are not already safe in their bolt-holes - with the persistant vain pratings of the arrogant lackeys of the hyenistic perverts who currently reign over the planet.

    So tell us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Flak, we the people can't find justice anywhere. That is the axis and crux of the matter, and the resulting rampant criminality we witness.

    Perhaps, if there could be just one (1) case of intensive and comprehensive investigation of a notable shyster by a citizens' court? With full disclosure of the crimes, the requisite accountability, and justice via incarceration, applicable fines and restitution...with public disclosure. Then, a posterboy for this criminal class could be held up as an example.

    Because, if there is one (1) shyster exposed completely -- we know there are hundreds of thousands more feeding off the population. We just can't get any investigations and justice, because somewhere along the line, a bought-off judge or councilman derails the process.

    Freaking "pick" your sleazebag to go after -- Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, Geithner, Paulson, Greenspan, Bush, Cheney, etc., or start with a smaller fish. Hire that investigative reporter who wears the hat (can't recall his name at the moment -- starts with a "P", he's wrote a number of popular books), and do a full court press on one of these criminal elites who seem untouchable.

    Break that "barrier", and maybe the juice will flow. That's my 2 cents for the morning.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Got it! Put Greg Palast on the case/chase. He's a fine investigator and writer and COTO in mind.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Paul Craig Roberts is an important voice in the alternate world view of dissidence because he was once part of the mainstream.

    He seems to have been shocked awake to the ubernonsense by the 9/11 psyop.

    As an economist his insights into the criminal syndicate posing as "government" are especially valuable.

    Obviously the larger audience that is reached with this message; that the government is simply a usurpting fraud, the sooner the ballance is tipped.

    Thanks JG for up-generating this.

    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, Boom, but you are asking other people to do it, and they never will. Can we bring any of them to book? Well, it's an idea, but again, the verdict will not be in our hands.

    But can we DRAFT our obedient-or-rope servants to do what WE tell them? Again, can we? A better chance there, if it can be done, with an outcome much nearer all our hearts.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm a fan of PCR's articles/rants. He hits the nail on the head, in common language, every time.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Flak, what's your idea of "bringing em to book"? I also don't understand the phrase, "obedient-or-rope" servants. Please explain...

    Do you mean vigilante horse-thief justice? Hang em by their $380 ties?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well, either we can initiate due process against your choice of villain, which frankly I imagine would be a dead horse before you start, or you can employ a citizen's arrest, detain said miscreant and even hold a citizens' court to try him or her. - A little informal, but what the hell? They kill thousands of us informally every year. The fact that they pretty-mouth is as 'judicial this or that' means nothing. It's murder. So a duly conducted citizens' court verdict might well be seen as Justice, and about time too.

    As to obedient-or-rope servants, I mean just that. Our public servants should be warned that corruption is a capital offence, and be penalised by following through. The alternative is what we have now, with millions dead all over the world as a result of criminal wars and deliberately permitted deprivation of the means to live, with a bumper crop to follow in the immediate future. Yes, hang the bastards.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Forked tongues inside cancerous cheeks. Even Master Criminal Geithner can't spew the drivel without breaking out in laughter.

    I'll bet he was beaten up often as a pup.

    ReplyDelete
  10. not hard or often enough!
    he and bernanke and their ilk are the best argument for abortion I can think of.

    ReplyDelete