Monday, January 17, 2011

30 Vitally Important Things You Are Not Supposed to Know

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=klwWcp9eiPw#!]

(located at http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=193400)

26 comments:

  1. http://www.rense.com/general92/thit.htm

    This info in text.

    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is this really really true..for real? Geez, what a time to have a nazi pope.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes JG, this is really really true and for real.

    Just getting into the history of the Congressional Record all of this is revealed.

    ALL the popes have been despots but one--and he was gotten rid of post haste.
    [see: the Godfather films for the real poop on this]

    Have no fear kiddies, some BIG boojie woojie is about to land and spoil the Grand Chessboard game.

    Hold on to your hats.....

    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Rogue1 -- I saw this, and figured I'd put it up. Later I saw you had posted the renses' link on another thread. Funny.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A conjunction of the stars mine Booninhiemer. A transmutell divinatic chord swipe on the lathe of heaven. Chinga chinga hoodoo bell black and pimpled majik spells

    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  6. Cha-ching!

    ReplyDelete
  7. In the above video
    it states the following;

    "6) The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA,
    and all of the other alphabet gangs
    were never part of the U.S. government.
    Even though the "U.S. Government"
    held stock in the various agencies.

    (U.S. v, Strang, 254 US 491
    Lewis v, US 680, F.2d, 1239)"

    purrrr ...

    so I checked their facts

    http://supreme.justia.com/us/254/491/case.html

    http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/680/1239/200393/

    and found this during my quest;

    "TITLE 12 >CHAPTER 3 >SUBCHAPTER IX > S 341

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode12/usc_sec_12_00000341----000-.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. Students today are frequently
    taught that unfettered free enterprise
    collapsed of its own weight in 1929,
    paving the way for a decade-long economic
    depression full of hardship and
    misery. The story is typically presented
    as follows: An important pillar of capitalism,
    the stock market, crashed and
    dragged America into depression.
    President Herbert Hoover, an advocate
    of “hands-off,” or laissez-faire, economic
    policy, refused to use the power
    of government to intervene in the
    economy and conditions worsened as
    a result. It was up to Hoover’s successor,
    Franklin Delano Roosevelt, to ride
    in on the white horse of government intervention
    and steer the nation toward
    recovery. The apparent lesson to be
    drawn is that capitalism cannot be
    trusted; government needs to take an
    active role in the economy to save us
    from catastrophe.
    But those who propagate this version
    of history might just as well top off
    their remarks by saying, “And
    Goldilocks found her way out of the forest,
    Dorothy made it from Oz back to
    Kansas.”~ Lawrence W. Reed

    To really get a sense of 1933, the opening scenes of the remake of King Kong are almost like being in New York at that time. [about a quarter of the film]

    Of course those of us paying attention understand that L.W. Reed is not exaggerating to characterize pop history as fantasy and fairytale. Even the detailed history of perception manipulation as social engineering is available as supporting evidence to the particulars of sociopolitical history that are factually misrepresented by the system. In fact all lines of serious inquiry lead to a congruence that the majority is living in a virtual trance, enchanted by powerful dark forces.

    This power is monolithic in that it is pyramidal, but only the very top, the “cap” of the pyramid is status quo. On the levels beneath there is struggle for position and access to the status quo. It is a state of what could be defined as hierarchical anarchy. Then of course there is merely the groan of the layers below to the base of this bestial architecture.~ww

    But....there is always this to ponder upon:
    From list of 1184 known Potentially Hazardous Asteroids
    I picked at random; No. 2010 ON101 at it's position tonight Jan 18,2011
    It is a class : Apollo [NED, PHA] SPK-ID 3541751

    From looking at he chart it looks like a direct hit or real close miss in a few months...wow???
    And that is just one of these suckers.

    So, what is going to happen in the future?

    Humans can only assess by understanding themselves as far as sociopolitical, and makes some prescient guesses—but as far as “Nature”, it's a crap shoot, especially beyond the canopy of Earth's atmosphere. As always: ANTHING CAN HAPPEN AT ANYTIME. And you can be very sure that it will {grin}\\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  9. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA,
    and all of the other alphabet gangs
    were never part of the U.S. government.
    Even though the “U.S. Government”
    held stock in the various agencies.
    (U.S. v, Strang, 254 US 491
    Lewis v, US 680, F.2d, 1239)”

    Ah, I see how US v Stang has relevance to the assertions about the Intel agencies.

    I'll admit the Executive Order by Clinton, seemed oblique to me. It was hard to discern the relevance to their point.

    I have to look at the other two Pod, thanks for the footwork.
    ww

    ReplyDelete
  10. The other two jive with the crazy beat...

    What gets stickier is whn you go up the chain and try to get a grasp on the deal with Great Britain and the Vatican. Some esoteric haze makes this a bit murky, as reasonable as the assertions are circumstantially.

    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1. Create the STRAWMAN, 2. Patent your land, 3. Invoke Common Law when in court. 4. Know IRS laws on Labor and Wages.

    Read the 10 and get to know the Secret Service up close and personal.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Great stuff gents.

    ReplyDelete
  13. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=193470

    Despite extensive surveillance, the FBI was never able to find any direct funding or other links between King and the Communist party.

    This is the final sentence from the article, Martin Luther King: Communist - Adulterer - Plagiarist - Zionist Martyr by Rumor Mill News

    Ha ha ha ha ha....the whole article is full of innuendo that King was a Communist, but the truth of the matter isn't stated until the very last sentence. Cute.
    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  14. I always bring my salt shaker to such mainstream publications as this one on the Secret Servants to the Crown...er, I MEAN, the Secret Servile...er...aw you know what I mean.

    Hell, I don't gotta mean bone in my body...but that taper femur I keep under my car seat...a momento from Stanley's Q-brick.

    All the fiber in the meal is in the margins.
    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  15. Y'all might want to read Bob Chapman's latest report at:

    http://theinternationalforecaster.com/International_Forecaster_Weekly/Debt_Bondage_From_The_Economic_Treason_of_Banks

    The picture is becoming more clear by the minute around the world of exactly WHO is causing the Economic Holocaust.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I have the time because I have the inclination to argue against the state. To argue against the system. I make the time because the argument against tyranny is essential. It must be done.
    If not I, whom?

    The argument must be persistent and relentless. It must be made until tyranny is once again banished to its ugly little chamber and locked inside by just law.

    One voice, one voice if true, will be joined in chorus in time.~ww the Disobedient
    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  17. AMAZING
    Slush fund accounts of major US politicians identified and seized at Vatican Bank (Rome). Connection established with Daniel Dal Bosco RICO indictment, which cites Giancarlo Bruno, Silvio Berlusconi & Ban Ki Moon.

    On Wednesday 5th January 2011, it emerged that US establishment-related slush fund accounts had been located in, and seized from, the Vatican Bank in Rome. The source of funds for these accounts in almost every instance was found to be the US Treasury.

    Beneficiaries of the covert Vatican accounts include Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and each of the Obama children, Michelle Obama's mother, all the Bushes and the Clintons, including Chelsea Clinton, Joe Biden, Timothy Geithner, Janet Napolitano, several US Senators, including Mitch McConnell, several US Congressmen including John Boehner, several US Military Chiefs of Staff, the US Provost Marshal, the US Judge Advocate General, the US Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Roberts, several US Judges, the Pope, and several cardinals.

    Big money was found in each of the accounts. The longer the beneficiaries have been in office, the greater the account balances were found to be. They range from a few million USD to more than a billion USD in the case of John Roberts. The total number of slush fund accounts so far identified at the Vatican Bank is said to be between 600 and 700. This number is likely to grow as international élite corruption investigations spread worldwide.

    From Bob Chapman article boom recommends above.
    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  18. The disasters of an alleged revolution

    Keynes Strikes Back

    by Ettore Gotti Tedeschi

    http://www.vatican.va/news_services/or/or_quo/commenti/2011/010q01b1.html

    Hunter Lewis, (born October 1947) is the co-founder of Cambridge Associates LLC, a global investment firm, and author of books in the fields of economics and moral philosophy.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Lewis

    ReplyDelete
  19. You read Italian Pod?
    Wish you would translate this...

    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  20. The disasters of an alleged revolution
    Keynes Strikes Back
    by Ettore Gotti Tedeschi

    In an essay American economist Hunter Lewis (All errors of Keynes, Torino, Ibl Books, 2010) describes the doctrinal errors and practical disasters of the so-called Keynesian revolution. Keynes, like Garibaldi, you should not speak ill. We will make an effort. But we have to call into question the British economist for the economic policies currently applied in the United States, and partly in Europe, seem inspired by its own doctrines.
    In summary and with the necessary resolution, Keynes taught that to deal with a time of economic crisis, regardless of its origins, it should support demand at all costs, thus penalizing the ability to save. Consequently, the researcher set out to do what is done today, especially in the United States to promote private consumption in debt, making public spending, saving businesses in difficulty to maintain employment and therefore demand. And, of course, to issue paper money and raise taxes.
    We are discovering that the economic policy we've seen in recent years has adopted a name: it is the famous Keynesian doctrine. A doctrine that continues to be followed in the United States, where today is the excessive nationalizing private debt in order to restart consumption. This so-called nationalization takes place mainly by saving the banks which had granted too much credit, without appropriate safeguards. Funding for the rescue is through the issuance of currency.
    In contrast, in Europe, where the private is not much indebted, the Keynesian policy she attacked his despised savings. This is transformed into an instrument to absorb through the privatization of the huge public debt, the banking and corporate debt.
    In both the U.S. and Europe, but with almost the opposite problem, the solution to an increase in debt - in order to sustain a GDP growth necessary to offset the collapse of births - is conducted with the Keynesian policy of zero interest rates (after inflation become true even negative).
    The zero rates are effectively equivalent to a transfer of wealth from those who have been spared virtuous (though not Keynes) who is virtuously indebted (to Keynes). In practice, this is a hidden tax on the poor savers, a charge transferred to the rich: governments, entrepreneurs and bankers too much debt.
    Above all, zero rates allow or require governments to manage the economy, without correcting the inefficiencies and distortions in facilitating competition. With more and more the consequence of stimulating the flight of private entrepreneurs in production relocation.
    But all this leaves even imagine that the maneuver chosen to absorb the debt created in the future - both in the U.S. and Europe about three times GDP - and inflation. This does not explode because the fuel remains prudently and necessarily low. And someone called for new taxes to support a new state and strengthens a weak political class throughout the Western world.

    ________________________________________


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOiZP8FS5Ww

    ReplyDelete
  21. Cool Pod, thanks big plenty. \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yes the fixx is in...I get it.
    Those crafty bankers.
    No wonder they like plying their wits against their familiar, in those jaunty fox hunts.
    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yes, thanks gents. Schemes and Scams to defraud, wrapped in convoluted economic-speak. The results speak volumes, and tell the story...

    ReplyDelete
  24. I found this -

    http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/GrossErrors.html

    ReplyDelete
  25. Good kitty, found a rat and drops it on the cotocarpet...{grin.

    So what do you think Pod?

    Who was that masked man?

    It is a matter of the congressional record that the US declared bankruptsy in 1933.
    The same record shows the Secretary of Treasury moved to the IMF as Reciever.
    This is all in the first article I wrote for COTO that JG posted for me. All the government numbers are sited therein.

    I am not saying that the take in the video above has everything right. But I can say that even though the French contributed to the American cause in the Revolutionary War--there are indications of Masonic backroom jigglesmooky.
    {the British Generals threw the war.} For detail of this read THE MARCH OF FOLLY. Now this author does not posit that the British General threw the war--that is in the subtext if you understand that she was merely presuming stupidity and folly for their egregious errors.

    At any rate, I see the article as written by an accountant or lawyer with a very academic and shallow base of understanding and no concept of deep history.
    Probably someone who would deny that the Patriot act is the same instrument as Nazi Germany's Enabling Act--and would give you point by point issues as strawmen to rebuke--when all of us here recognize the despotism of the current Homeland Security State.
    \\ll//

    ReplyDelete