Friday, August 20, 2010



As a veteran analyst the MO of the National Security State was my first intuition, the timing coincided with the Patriot Act legislation; as a cui bono red flag is not hard to miss. \\ll//

All here should remember George from the site incognito:

George Washington Blog | August 5, 2008

Whether or not Bruce Ivins had a role in the anthrax attacks, trying to now blame him alone for the attacks is ignoring the elephant in the room: the anthrax attack was a classic false flag attack blamed on Arabs.

For example:

The FBI was actually told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials

The anthrax letters attempt to link 9/11 and the anthrax attack and pretend to be from radical Muslims and be anti-America and anti-Israel

High-level government insiders pointed towards Iraq as the source of the anthrax, even though there was absolutely no reason to think that the anthrax had come from Iraq.......

A good read, check it out.


  1. This one is even easier than "911."

    Now Doktor-Rabbi Zak is positioning himself as "the loyal opposition."

    You'd think he'd just take his slice of the missing trillions and just go-the-fuck AWAY.

    But a "Zionist?" I don't think so. Just another fucking "double high."

  2. John Dean and the psychologist he quotes are still hung up in that Hegelian hairball, calling this authoritarian tendency, "right-wing authoritarians".

    Bullshit, they are simply authoritarians--the left/right gimble is the goomba ticket.

    It is the Left/Right monkey tango that is the fiction, not the Zionist stagemaster who choreographs thus.

    I know why you reject the Protocols, it's because you're still afraid of the Hitler myth, the old WWII demonizing propaganda. Hitler-Stalin-Roosevelt were triplets from the same pod from the beanstalk of Zion.

    Sorry, I forgot to punctuate anything here with "fuck"...maybe next time.


  3. Trotsky is a good example of what I mean--all the traits given as "Right-wing authoritarian", NOT rightwing--the bird needs two wings to fly.

    This is why you will find the Right Hegelian school and the Left Hegelian school--Both being Mythical, fucking mythical statists. {grin}



    A note to all Coto members: The frequency of foul language has hit a high. I ask that it discontinue or is reduced to usage in most special circumstances.

    It does offend sensibilitities and I have received such communications to this issue.

  5. I was beginning to get that feeling myself--thus my comments on that certain word above.

    In short, I agree.


  6. well gosh darn it, so do I. With impending die-off and the deaths of millions, we certainly don't want to use any no-no words. Especially if it offends the "sensibilities" of anonymous "communicants."

    Shucks, since you have already determined the so-and-sos at "fault," I just don't have a thing to contribute. I remained here in defiance of "language police" and "anonymous communication." Here it is again.

    So ban me, brave "libertarians." I've had enough of Aryan Nations anyway.

  7. Wel goshdang poody oh mighty, from one so-and-so to another, I find your referance to 'Arian Nations' to be at such stratospheric stupidity that 'no no words' are all you have left from lack of ogygen.

    The ignorant very often find the truth insulting.

    Ban yourself. I don't think anyone here is for that, or is going to do it.


  8. For your edification Woowoo:

    The difference between the Jewish soul ... and the soul of all the Gentiles ... is greater and deeper than the difference between the soul of a man and the soul of an animal. — Rabbi Avraham Yitzhak HaCohen Kook (1865-1935)

    Abraham Isaac Kook (1865–1935) was the first Ashkenazi chief rabbi of the British Mandate for Palestine, the founder of the Religious Zionist Yeshiva Merkaz HaRav, Jewish thinker, Halachist, Kabbalist and a renowned Torah scholar. He is known in Hebrew as הרב אברהם יצחק הכהן קוק HaRav Avraham Yitzchak HaCohen Kook, and by the acronym HaRaAYaH or simply as "HaRav." He was one of the most celebrated and influential rabbis of the 20th century.

    Zionism is ... racist, it is nationalist, and it is Biblically inspired (rather than spiritually inspired). Being a fundamentalist movement, Zionism is not categorically different from Nazism. Only when we understand Zionism in its nationalist and racist context will we begin to comprehend the depth of its atrocities. — Gilad Atzmon

  9. By the way Woowoo,

    Atzmon is Jewish. What I speak to is insane racist Zionism, just like he does. If you are so STOOOPID, you can't make that distinction I can only attribute it to your academic mind programming.

    If you got the guts Woowooman


  10. Zionists are experts at propaganda, disinformation, denying facts and outright lying. Any criticism of Zionism or of Israel is labeled as "anti-semitism", where this is interpreted to mean "anti-Jewish". This is a slanderous falsehood. Criticism of Zionism is criticism of a particularly ugly political movement, not criticism of a religion or of the adherents of a religion. One may be critical of Zionism and of Zionists while at the same time being quite tolerant of, or well-disposed toward, or even an adherent of, the Jewish religion.--Victor Thorn

    What's the matter Woowoopaper? Your bag of tricks don't work anymore and you are off assignment?
    No, that is not innuendo, that is a flat out indictment...personal, from me, not COTO.