Two questions:Is it better to take out the vermin or to abolish the illusory tool they use so effectively against the rest, or both?Your active response or your life?
On the other hand, while I do not for one minute doubt the malign intentions of 'the elect', and would be the last person in the world to call the bestial Rockefeller a liar in his declared intention to wipe the majority of us off the face of the earth, and while I do believe that the evil Wolfowitz's intended nuke on or near Houton four years or so ago was real, and was deflected only by the intervention of German Intelligence to spill the beans, I also think that this whole idea of Reversed Speech by any stretch of the imagination is really stretching our credulity a smidge, and we might ask, then why do it? After all, isn't plain and evident evil obvious enough?Answer: Yes it is. Then let's stop it.
Boomer this is the creepiest thing I have read in the past few months. I hope Ken Welch is wrong, very wrong. However, having said that, I was having the exact same thoughts myself. That they will hit us with the REAL pandemic in the near future.Those fema camps, fema evacuation buses, mass graves and contingency plans weren't being prepared just on a whim now were they?
Glad you're all thinking and commenting. To help generate considered opinions, epiphanies, theories that hold water, etc. -- that's why I put this type of piece up. Use your heads and instincts, experience and knowledgebases and "let her fly"! I don't care about group consensus -- just The Truth. Cut through any B.S. with your "critical knife" and bring up your points of contention...and we'll eventually get to the Obvious!
sounds like a mix of truth and lies/propaganda (cytokine storm and 1918 virus true, but the part about NOT being able to re-create the virus false; they were able to sequence and re-create it, (by a scientist from guess who...Baxter) The vaccine versions with squalene and mercury DO cause imunne suppression so that a different virus than is in the vaccine can now attack with force and cause a cytokine storm, but the parts about targeting it to minorities/boomers seems wrong; my wife was offered the shot (non squalene, but with mercury) at last two pregnancy checkups (we politely declined both) and a limited amount has been given out at local vaccine clinics in town here last week. I have read other 'reverse speech article by this guy and most seemed kinda wacky to me.
What the hell is reverse speech study?
They play the speech backwards and try to read significance into the garbled sounds produced. Then they write screeds about what they imagine they've heard.
Mary, investigators collect speech from years ago that meant nothing to them years ago. And then today as things become exposed and clearer to the mind, the recorded speech from years ago is then reverse searched for clues and pieced together in a cookie-crumb trail back to their up-to-date conclusion of today.
Levin, go through to Welch's page above, 'Armageddon Fails', and you will hear them reversing the phrases from various speeches. It is what he says it is. Don't argue, just go and look and listen.
the bit about going to renses and never finding info there??aww come on. he runs some good stuff you can track back. and he certainly IS a pain in the butt for MSM and authorities.reverse speech..I played..whatever record backward and I heard the devil..isnt that the old quote?like the Parsons egg, some bits are ok.some are frankly, off.
To me, such a ridiculously long screed with no lasting novelty or attraction that relies on unrelenting graphics is a diversion from my process. I will avoid these sites in future, so thanks for the tip. And don't let me crash your reverse speech parties....party on! He he.