Thursday, July 23, 2009

What are the Origins of Swine Flu? Is the H1N1 Virus Endemic in Canada's Hog Farms?

pig farmThe Case of British Columbia
By Alex Roslin    Global Research, July 22, 2009

www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=14499

Remember when they called it “swine flu”? The first pandemic flu in 41  years was quickly renamed “H1N1” in its early days after the pig
industry, in damage-control mode, proclaimed loudly that people
couldn’t get sick from eating pork. And they said that it looked like
the flu was spreading worldwide from person to person—not from pigs to people.

More than two months after the initial outbreak, it’s still not clear
how the flu started. The most accepted explanation is that a farm
worker at a massive swine operation in Mexico got the virus from a pig and carried it into the wider population, where it spread without any more involvement from pigs.

But a closer look at the data on H1N1 cases in B.C. and the rest of
Canada suggests the pandemic has a much closer relationship with pig farming than suspected. That relationship is especially striking in
the most serious cases of the flu that have caused hospitalization and
death.

The Fraser Health Authority, the district with the largest number of
pigs in the province—and one of the most intensively farmed areas in
Canada—has a 39-percent-higher rate of confirmed H1N1 cases per capita (9.7 per 100,000 people) than the provincial average (7.0 per
100,000), according to data from the B.C. Centre for Disease Control
as of July 6. B.C.’s first confirmed death from H1N1 flu occurred on
July 13 in the region.

The rate is even higher in the Northern Health Authority, which has
the highest ratio of pigs to people in the province. The northern
region has a 48-percent-higher per capita H1N1 rate (10.3 per 100,000) than the B.C. average.

The data shows a near-perfect 93-percent correlation between the
number of pigs in a health region and the number of confirmed H1N1 cases there. (Correlation measures the strength of the relationship between two groups of data. A correlation of 70 percent or higher is generally considered to be strong.)

Density of pigs also seems to have a relationship with H1N1 rates—
especially when it comes to the most recent flu cases. There is a 95-
percent correlation between new cases of H1N1 confirmed during the
week of June 29 and the number of pigs per farm in a particular region.

The same high correlations exist Canada-wide, according to Statistics Canada figures on pig farms and an analysis of data on confirmed H1N1 cases from the Public Health Agency of Canada as of July 8. The data shows that the flu has been more severe in areas with intensive, large- scale hog production.

The total number of confirmed H1N1 cases in each province has a 99- percent correlation with the number of pig farms in that province.

In Quebec, the province with the highest number of pigs—4.3 million—residents were twice as likely to be hospitalized when they acquired H1N1 as the Canadian average. Quebec’s death rate from H1N1 per capita has been 60 percent higher than the national average.

The flu outbreak has been even more severe in Manitoba, which has 2.4 pigs per person, more than any other province. There, the number of H1N1 hospitalizations per capita is triple the national average. The rate of H1N1 deaths per capita in Manitoba has been more than 3.7  times higher than the Canadian average.

The high correlations surprised even long-time critics of intensive,
large-scale farming. “Wow, that’s astounding,” said Peter Fricker,
projects and communications director for the Vancouver Humane Society.

“If there is a possible link between pig farms and susceptibility to
disease, public-health authorities should definitely be investigating.
If the correlations are correct, the whole issue of factory farming
has to be looked at,” he said in a phone interview.

“Wow, really. I don’t think anybody’s looked at this before,” said Bob
Martin, who headed the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal  Production, which released a major study last year that said workers  in large farms and their neighbours have high rates of asthma and  other respiratory illnesses due to manure runoff and emissions like  ammonia and fine-particle pollution.

Martin, speaking from Washington, D.C., said some people living near pig farms could be more susceptible to H1N1 and to more severe  reactions because of such respiratory ailments.

As of mid-June, 40 percent of the people who had died of H1N1 in the  U.S. had had an additional medical condition like asthma, diabetes, a  compromised immune system, or heart disease, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.

Dr. David Patrick, director of epidemiology at the B.C. Centre for
Disease Control, said the data could mean people living in hog-
producing regions have a higher predisposition to catching H1N1. But  he cautioned that there could be other, unknown explanations for the high correlations, too.

“The fact that particulates can predispose people to asthma is clear.
If particulates are an issue, we have to gradually improve our
environment,” he said.

“If we have issues of predisposition [to catching H1N1], that’s a
question for sober inquiry by people in environmental health.”

Until now, he said, public-health officials have believed H1N1 spreads randomly between people or may cluster in areas with dense human populations.

“Probably the most important message is if people with flu symptoms  have asthma or chronic lung disease or anything that affects their immune system, see a doctor right away because antivirals can help avoid hospitalization,” he said.

The B.C. Pork Producers Association didn’t return a call for comment.

In the province’s agricultural heartland, the Fraser Valley, H1N1
seems to be going strong instead of dying off after the end of the
usual flu season, as initially predicted. So far, the vast majority of
incidents have been mild, but a flurry of 22 new H1N1 cases there was  confirmed during the week of June 29. That number was the highest in any region of the province and almost twice as many per capita as the provincial average.

The high numbers coincide with a trend of relatively high incidence of recent H1N1 cases in some of the biggest hog-producing provinces.  During the week after July 3, Manitoba saw the highest rate of new confirmed H1N1 cases per capita in Canada (8.4 per 100,000)—5.6 times more than the Canadian average (1.5 per 100,000).

The location of new flu cases also seems to have a close relationship
with especially high concentrations of pig farming. There is an 80-
percent correlation between the number of new cases in the seven days after July 3 and a province’s ratio of pigs to people. In other words, the more pigs there are per person, the higher the rate of the flu.

And no region of Canada has a higher density of farm animals by weight  than the Fraser Valley, according to Hans Schreier, a soil scientist and professor emeritus at the University of British Columbia who has studied agricultural pollution in the Valley.

“We’re generating so much manure in these operations, it winds up in the soil and water,” he said in a phone interview.

Thanks in large part to massive amounts of farm waste pouring into the Fraser River watershed, the Georgia Basin is “perhaps the most
threatened area in the country” for coastal eutrophication—a process
that stimulates algae blooms and chokes marine life—according to a
study Schreier coauthored in 2006 in the journal Biogeochemistry. The study said farm-waste discharge is poorly regulated across Canada.

An Agriculture Canada report in 2002 found factory pig farms were
causing health and pollution risks to farm workers and the local
community. “In B.C.’s Fraser Valley, this chemical soup [from farm
emissions] is so thick it causes a visible haze and can make up 70 per
cent of the airborne particles in summer,” said the report, which was
quoted in a 2002 Ottawa Citizen story and was obtained under an access- to-information request.

And of all the farm animals in the region, pigs are by far the single
biggest source of smog-causing fine-particle pollution, contributing
64 percent of the total fine-particulate matter from all farm-animal
sources in the Fraser Valley Regional District, according to a 2004
study done for the district and Environment Canada.

That study noted that while air-quality improvement in the region had focused on reducing emissions from vehicles and industry, “emissions from agricultural operations have been relatively untouched.”

Meanwhile, levels of nitrogen—another big emission from farms—in
ground water in the Central Fraser have been above the allowable limit for drinking water since 1981, according to a 1997 UBC study published in the journal Environmental Management.

George Peary, the mayor of Abbotsford, shares his community with the highest number of pigs of any agricultural district in the province—75,570, according to the 2006 census. He acknowledged that manure from pig farms has seeped into ground water in some areas and made some well water undrinkable, but he defended farming practices. “I wouldn’t tie it [H1N1] to agricultural operations,” he said in a phone interview.

“If there were an issue, the public-health people would keep me
informed.…There would be all sorts of bells and whistles going off.”

A top health official also dismissed the higher H1N1 rates in his
region and said they’re not worthy of further investigation or action.
“It just doesn’t matter. It spreads from person to person.…We’re not
looking at it from that perspective,” said Dr. Roland Guasparini,
chief medical health officer with the Fraser Health Authority.

In recent years, the B.C. government has encouraged hog producers to spread far north to the fertile Peace River region, where there’s more available farmland. The policy has helped turn Peace River into the fastest-growing hog-producing region in the entire country, with a threefold expansion in pig numbers between 2001 and 2006. The region is now home to 24,000 pigs, more than double the human population of Dawson Creek, the region’s administrative centre.

And it just so happens that the Northern Health Authority, which
includes the Peace River area, has the highest ratio of pigs to people
in the province—and the highest rate of confirmed H1N1 flu cases per capita.

Just across the nearby Alberta border, Denis Sauvageau has all kinds
of experience with pig farms moving in next door. He is a fourth-
generation farmer in a tiny community called Falher.

On April 28, Canada’s first death related to H1N1 occurred at the High Prairie Health Complex, a 50-minute drive east from Sauvageau’s house. The woman had had asthma-related difficulties, though there’s no evidence they were related to farming emissions.

Sauvageau still recalls vividly how hog producers first came to town
in the late 1990s with a slick promotion campaign promising a miracle of rural revitalization. “They would create jobs, keep schools open, keep our children here,” he said.

Today, the smell from a complex of large pig farms five kilometres
away is often so strong, Sauvageau can’t stay outside. “The stench is
gut-wrenching. It makes you want to puke. You’re done for the night.”

Sauvageau and his neighbours started a protest group, the Peace River Environmental Society, six years ago to demand improvements in farm waste management practices. They held demonstrations. The group estimated that the 50,000 swine in nearby farms produce 20 million gallons of manure per year.

Especially worrisome, he said, are the health problems in nearby areas— high rates of asthma and other respiratory illnesses.

The group finally convinced a reluctant province to study air quality
in the area. “Odours do extend into surrounding areas at levels that
may disrupt quality of life,” a draft version of the province’s report
said in 2007. “The subgroup agreed by consensus that odour from CFOs [confined feeding operations] can have health effects.”

(The report was never published because the committee writing it,
dominated by government and industry officials, couldn’t reach
agreement on the document; Sauvageau’s group posted the draft on its Web site.)

The report cited other studies that had found ammonia from farms can reach levels in the surrounding area that can cause eye and throat irritation, respiratory problems, haze, and fine-particle pollution. Farm emissions of hydrogen sulphide, an eye and respiratory-tract irritant and neurotoxin at high doses, can “cause significant quality- of-human-life concern at the local scale”, according to a 2003 U.S. National Research Council study cited in the report.

The Alberta report also cited international research that found pig-
farm workers have rates of chronic bronchitis that are 2.5 to 5 times
higher than those in the wider population and 50- to 100-percent
higher than those in dairy and poultry workers.

The possible connection between intensive hog operations and H1N1
means governments should tighten rules on farm waste, according to the  humane society’s Peter Fricker. “They’re like small cities, except
with no sewer system. You could understand why there would be a risk to human health.”

The Pew Commission’s Bob Martin agreed: “We have reached the point that we have to decentralize this production. It’s really a critical kind of issue.”

With 22 new flu cases confirmed just on July 13 and 14—two-thirds in the Fraser—maybe we’ll be calling it “swine flu” again soon.

© Copyright Alex Roslin, straight.com, 2009

Disclaimer: http://cotocrew.wordpress.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes.

9 comments:

  1. There is no doubt in my mind that meat produced at factory pig farms is making us sick I just don't think they have anything to do with the swine flu.

    The flu came straight from a military lab. I have a feeling, even though it's good they are saying hog farms are bad, that this article is being used to throw us off the scent of the real pigs of the fascist variety.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When this Swine Flu outbreak first took shape, I wrote about it on my site.

    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/category/swine-flu/

    While Alex Jones was running his weekend "The End is Nigh!" marathon, I was one of the first to point out that a WHO official had reported that there were still only 7 confirmed cases at that time.

    The outbreak still start at a Smithfield processing plant in Mexico and there is ample reason to believe that the whole H1N1 thing came from a spin doctor who didn't want the name "Swine Flu" to have a negative impact on sales world-wide.

    I tend to think if it was designed to cause mass panic and turmoil, then it would have been more efficient. More deadly.

    It's important to remember that every "disaster capitalism" event isn't necessarily manufactured. Sometimes opportunists will rise to the occasion.

    Now, that is not to say that the vaccine is not bullshit... but I also have a hard time believing (like Icke suggests) that the vaccine is going to kill off 100s of millions of people.

    There would seem to be a little "liability" issue with that perhaps...

    ReplyDelete
  3. There's very real chance that the virus came from a laboratory. But even if it did, the statistics from Canada show pigs are a very direct vector in its spread.

    Industrial agriculture is dangerous to the communities it occupies. Corporate honchos have diluted and jumped over any sensible public health concerns during the last 20 years and put many of us at serious risk.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Scott, it's the upcoming vaccines that are deadly, not the flu itself. THough we may see a more virulent strain emerge in the fall.

    Speaking of WHO....Didn't you also find it strange that WHO was reporting only 7 confirmed cases and raising it to pandemic level 5/6 which is widespread human infection? Did that concern you at all? Didn't you wonder WHY?

    You do know level 6 means martial law can be imposed and mandatory vaccinating can be implemented? Raising it to the top level when there is no proof this flu is any worse than any other is what is cause for alarm.

    It was obviously lab created since it came from humans, birds and pigs and several continents. It's a real stretch of the imagination to believe that combination could happen naturally. It's almost as incredible to believe as 19 hijackers w/boxcutters implemented 9/11.

    Scott, just as 9/11 was the setup for the patriot act & military commissions and a loss of freedom, this lab created flu and the vaccines to follow are the next step.

    If you don't believe it then read the Icke article Barb posted and note this info:

    We are told that the drug companies and the World Health Organisation have been working at fever pitch to develop a vaccine for the 'new' swine flu strain known as H1N1, but ... wait for it ... Baxter International filed a patent for the H1N1 vaccine on August 28th 2008. Click here to read ...

    Baxter Vaccine Patent Application US 2009/0060950 A1 says:

    '... In particular preferred embodiments the composition or vaccine comprises more than one antigen ... such as influenza A and influenza B in particular selected from of one or more of the human H1N1, H2N2, H3N2, H5N1, H7N7, H1N2, H9N2, H7N2, H7N3, H10N7 subtypes, of the pig flu H1N1, H1N2, H3N1 and H3N2 subtypes, of the dog or horse flu H7N7, H3N8 subtypes or of the avian H5N1, H7N2, H1N7, H7N3, H13N6, H5N9, H11N6, H3N8, H9N2, H5N2, H4N8, H10N7, H2N2, H8N4, H14N5, H6N5, H12N5 subtypes.'

    The patent was published in March 2009, a month before the virus was released in Mexico in April, but it was filed seven months before this 'new strain' was officially known about. It is the most blatant set-up you could ever see.

    The patent includes the following ingredients and toxicity warning:

    'Suitable adjuvants can be selected from mineral gels, aluminium hydroxide, surface active substances, lysolecithin, pluronic polyols, polyanions or oil emulsions such as water in oil or oil in water, or a combination thereof. Of course, the selection of the adjuvant depends on the intended use. E.g. toxicity may depend on the destined subject organism and can vary from no toxicity to high toxicity.'

    We already know Baxter tried to kill people with their "vaccine" back in the spring.

    Add to this ....Our soldiers are getting sick and dying from the "mystery shots" they are being given. Then the military pretends no such shots were ever administered. Weird huh?

    I don't think the vaccine will "kill off hundreds of millions of people" immediately. Many will develop slower developing auto immune diseases and have health issues down the road from the elements contained in the vaccine. But I do believe a eugenics/depopulation program has been in place for years and it is moving forward. There is no other explanation for it.

    IF all this doesn't convince you that something bigger and more sinister than a spin dr for factory farming doing his job then I guess nothing will.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Industrial agriculture is dangerous to the communities it occupies. Corporate honchos have diluted and jumped over any sensible public health concerns during the last 20 years and put many of us at serious risk."

    I couldn't agree with you more laudy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, if you had checked my link up there you would see that I have been pointing out for a while that the WHO has been over hyping this H1N1 outbreak since day one.

    There are several articles about why.

    I don't support the idea of mandatory vaccinations and I certainly won't advise people to accept them... in any way.

    But, the origins of the virus are still up in the air. And I still believe that if they wanted to create a panic they would have used something a little more deadly than the common cold...

    The vaccine itself may have serious side effects that's why I won't take it.

    But if you really think that their "big plan" is to have people line up to take vaccinations that just kill people... you know, eventually people would stop lining up for the vaccination. So that really doesn't make a great deal of sense as a "master plan" you know.

    They're more clever than that.

    There are criminal liability issues and of course the old "lynch mob" thing to deal with.

    Perhaps a "side effect" would be sterilization... that would curb population growth... that makes sense...

    As far as Icke is concerned, I have seen a few recent videos of the man and I like what he is about. Very well researched and pretty much right on the money.

    But you are ultimately talking about one article. One article from a man who was ranting about the "reptilians" not too long ago...

    I tend to err on the side of caution when it comes to his read on the death vaccines, thanks.

    I wont take the shot, if that is ultimately what you are getting at.

    and like I said before, the Disaster Capitalists don't create EVERY single crisis... sometimes they just REACT to them... and exploit them as best they can.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think, just as in '76, people WILL line up for the shots. I still know manywho get a flu shot every single year even though there have been many studies that say you are more likely to get the flu from the shot then the shot preventing it.

    People just aren't educated. When they start killing off more people in the fall (remember Napolitano, head of HS, warned about how bad it would be... I wonder how she knew?!) people will line up willingly for their free shot. IF it's made mandatory the rest of us will not be given the option to opt out and will be sent away for "quarantining. This may not be the big black op we've been expecting but it's got all the earmarks of one.

    I think their plan is brilliant. They are weakening our immune system with chem trails and putting drugs in our water supply to dumb us down. The sterilization process has most likely already begun using the same tactics. Then there is ELF and HAARP and god knows what else they are directing at us. All weapons against their common enemy.. us.

    Maybe their favorite tv show is "survivor." They are playing the game of "survival of the fittest" and that's why they don't want to off us in one fell swoop. Ever watch a cat play with a mouse before it kills it?

    ReplyDelete
  8. nonavax also patented well before the outbreak!
    suplied by cdc and Nih! and trials were based.but not necessarily residents of San Antonio.
    Funny how no one is saying if its causing MRSA resistant infections, but in reference to autopsies finding Lung Clots, i suspect it may well be.
    now people in areas that farm pigs also very often have MRSA restistance due to a larger(cheaper) supply of pork meat...( a DR reporting on it died mysteriously, see NYTimes about 6to 7 mths back)
    the whole pig farm theory falls in a heap if you take the Australian deaths into account, majority are city dewllers. and most rural deaths were NOT from piggery areas.
    Bad news here is I read today they want to ramp up our feedlots! no F/n way!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Scott wrote: "and like I said before, the Disaster Capitalists don’t create EVERY single crisis… sometimes they just REACT to them…"

    A very wise observation!

    ReplyDelete